Myocardial repolarization time, J-point to T-peak and T-peak to T-end intervals, have different heart rate dependency and autonomic nerve interference in healthy prepubertal children

OBJECTIVE

The JT interval of the myocardial repolarization time can be divided into Jpoint to T-peak interval (JTp) and T-peak to T-end interval (Tpe). It is well known that the JT interval is dependent on the heart rate, but little is known regarding heart rate dependence for JTp and Tpe. The aim of the present study was to clarify the heart rate dependence of JTp and Tpe and to elucidate the interference of autonomic nervous activity with these parameters.

METHODS

We evaluated 50 prepubertal children (mean age: 6.4 ± 0.5 years; male:female, 22:28) without heart disease. JTp, Tpe, and the preceding RR intervals were measured using 120 consecutive beats (lead CM5). First, the relationships between the RR interval and JTp and Tpe were evaluated by Pearson's correlation coefficient. Second, to evaluate autonomic interference with JTp and Tpe, the degree of coherence between RR interval variability and JTp or Tpe variability was calculated using spectral analysis.

RESULTS

Significant positive correlations were observed between the RR interval and JTp (y = 0.116x + 105.5; r = 0.594, p < 0.001) and between the RR interval and Tpe (y = 0.037x + 44.7; r = 0.432, p < 0.001). Tpe variability had a lower degree of coherence with RR interval variability (range: 0.039-0.5 Hz) than with JTp variability (0.401 [interquartile range, 0.352-0.460] vs. 0.593 [0.503-0.664], respectively; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Tpe had lower heart rate dependence and a lower degree of autonomic nervous interference than did JTp.

Confounders and Pharmacological Characterization When Using the QT, JTp, and Tpe Intervals in Beagle Dogs

INTRODUCTION

Corrected QT (QTc) interval is an essential proarrhythmic risk biomarker, but recent data have identified limitations to its use. The J to T-peak (JTp) interval is an alternative biomarker for evaluating drug-induced proarrhythmic risk. The aim of this study was to evaluate pharmacological effects using spatial magnitude leads and DII electrocardiogram (ECG) leads and common ECG confounders (ie, stress and body temperature changes) on covariate adjusted QT (QTca), covariate adjusted JTp (JTpca), and covariate adjusted T-peak to T-end (Tpeca) intervals.

METHODS

Beagle dogs were exposed to body hyper- (42 °C) or hypothermic (33 °C) conditions or were administered epinephrine to assess confounding effects on heart rate corrected QTca, JTpca, and Tpeca intervals. Dofetilide (0.1, 0.3, 1.0 mg/kg), ranolazine (100, 140, 200 mg/kg), and verapamil (7, 15, 30, 43, 62.5 mg/kg) were administered to evaluate pharmacological effects.

RESULTS

Covariate adjusted QT (slope -12.57 ms/°C) and JTpca (-14.79 ms/°C) were negatively correlated with body temperature but Tpeca was minimally affected. Epinephrine was associated with QTca and JTpca shortening, which could be related to undercorrection in the presence of tachycardia, while minimal effects were observed for Tpeca. There were no significant ECG change following ranolazine administration. Verapamil decreased QTca and JTpca intervals and increased Tpeca, whereas dofetilide increased QTca and JTpca intervals but had inconsistent effects on Tpeca.

CONCLUSION

Results highlight potential confounders on QTc interval, but also on JTpca and Tpeca intervals in nonclinical studies. These potential confounding effects may be relevant to the interpretation of ECG data obtained from nonclinical drug safety studies with Beagle dogs.