Low-Dose Computed Tomography (LDCT) Lung Cancer Screening in Asian Female Never-Smokers Is as Efficacious in Detecting Lung Cancer as in Asian Male Ever-Smokers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer in never-smokers is the major cancer cause of death globally. We compared the efficacy of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening among never-smokers versus ever-smokers using systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

LDCT lung cancer screening studies that simultaneously included both ever-smoker and never-smoker participants published by April 30, 2021, were searched through PubMed and Scopus. Primary outcome measure was relative risk (RR) of lung cancer diagnosed among never-smokers versus ever-smokers.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies (13 from Asia) were included (141,396 ever-smokers, 109,251 never-smokers, 1961 lung cancer cases diagnosed). RR of lung cancer diagnosed between ever-smokers versus never-smokers overall was 1.21 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89-1.65), 1.37 (95% CI: 1.08-1.75) among males, and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.59-1.31) among females. RR was 1.78 (95% CI: 1.41-2.24) and 1.22 (95% CI: 0.89-1.68) for Asian female never-smokers versus male never-smokers and versus male ever-smokers, respectively, and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.65-1.50) versus high-risk ever-smokers (≥30 pack-years). Proportional meta-analysis revealed significantly more lung cancers diagnosed at first scan (95.4% [95% CI: 84.9-100.0] versus 70.9% [95% CI: 54.6-84.9], p = 0.010) and at stage 1 (88.5% [95% CI: 79.3-95.4] versus 79.7% [95% CI: 71.1-87.4], p = 0.071) among never-smokers versus ever-smokers, respectively. RR of lung cancer death and 5-year all-cause mortality in never-smokers versus ever-smokers was 0.27 (95% CI: 0.1-0.55, p < 0.001) and 0.13 (95% CI: 0.05-0.33, p < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The RR of lung cancer detected by LDCT screening among female never-smokers and male ever-smokers in Asia was statistically similar. Overall and lung cancer specific mortality from the lung cancer diagnosed from LDCT screening was significantly reduced among never-smokers compared to ever-smokers.

Preliminary Testing of A Web-Based Lung Cancer Screening Decision Coaching Toolfor Older Chinese American Smokers and Their Providers

OBJECTIVES

To examine the acceptability of a culturally targeted lung cancer screening decision aid developed for older Chinese Americans with a smoking history and primary care providers serving this patient population.

METHODS

Study participants reviewed a web-based decision aid (DA) for lung cancer screening named "Lung Decisions Coaching Tool (LDC-T)." Participants completed a baseline survey and were invited to join an interview. During the interview, participants engaged with the Lung Decisions Coaching Tool and then completed standardized measures of acceptability, usability, and satisfaction.

RESULTS

Chinese American smokers (N =22) and Chinese American physicians (N=10) rated the acceptability and usability of a patient version and provider versions of the LDC-T, respectively. Patient version demonstrated high levels of acceptability, usability and satisfaction. Most participants rated the information provided as good or excellent, the amount of tool information was just right, and they thought the tool would be useful for making a screening decision. The tool was well received by participants for ease of use and well-integrated functions. Furthermore, participants indicated they would like to use the tool to help prepare for lung cancer screening shared decision-making with their provider. Similar results were found for the provider version of the LDC-T.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung cancer screening represents an evidence-based approach to reducing lung cancer morbidity and mortality among chronic high-frequency smokers. Study results suggest the acceptability of a culturally targeted lung cancer screening decision aid for Chinese American smokers and providers. Additional research is needed to determine the effectiveness of the DA in increasing appropriate levels of screening in this underserved population.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Risky Behaviors and Health Changes in African-American Smokers Who Are Eligible for LDCT Screening

The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted much of day-to-day life in the US and around the world. Smokers have a higher risk of adverse outcomes due to COVID-19. This study investigated the impact of COVID-19 on risky behaviors and health changes in lower income African-American smokers eligible for Low dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening, who may be more adversely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 22 African-American daily smokers who were eligible for LDCT screening participated in this study. The mean age of participants was 61.2 years old (SD = 4.7), 77.3% of the smokers were female, all participants had an income below $20,000, and 63.6% were on Medicaid. Descriptive statistics were used to provide summary information on demographics, COVID-19, and health status. Results showed that participants increased cigarette smoking, spent more time on screens, increased sugary drink consumption, consumed more vegetables and fruits, and engaged in more gardening activities during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, participants also decreased physical activity time and slept less during the pandemic. In general, more than one-third of participants gained more body weight and reported increased stress and anxiety. Our results suggest that African-American smokers who qualify for LDCT screening should be encouraged to consider strategies not only for smoking cessation, but also risky behavior control and management.

Differences in smoking prevalence and eligibility for low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening among older U.S. adults: role of sexual orientation

The purpose of this study was to determine the past-year prevalence estimates of cigarette smoking and eligibility for low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening among older U.S. adults and examine potential variations in these estimates by sexual orientation. Data were from the 2012-2013 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC-III) and included in-person interviews with a nationally representative sample of non-institutionalized adults aged 18 and older. Eligibility for LDCT was based on U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines. Analyses included participants aged 55-77 (n = 9,635). Overall, 17.5% of older adult respondents reported past-year smoking. Overall rates of past-year cigarette smoking were influenced by sex and sexual orientation with males reporting higher rates compared to females. Among both males and females, smoking was most prevalent among bisexual individuals. Eligibility for LDCT was also higher among males compared to females and among bisexually identified adults relative to homosexual and heterosexual-identified adults. Overall, 11.2% of older U.S. adults met eligibility for LDCT lung cancer screening. Eligibility for LDCT lung screening is associated with sexual orientation; the highest rates of eligibility are among bisexual women and men (26.9 and 24.5%, respectively). The current study found variations in cigarette smoking and eligibility for LDCT lung cancer screening (a proxy for chronic high-risk smoking) among older U.S. adults based on sexual orientation. Efforts to increase screening should take into account these differences.