1
|
Voizard N, Cerny M, Assad A, Billiard JS, Olivié D, Perreault P, Kielar A, Do RKG, Yokoo T, Sirlin CB, Tang A. Assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma treatment response with LI-RADS: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging 2019; 10:121. [PMID: 31853668 PMCID: PMC6920285 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-019-0801-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Accepted: 09/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) play critical roles for assessing treatment response of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after locoregional therapy. Interpretation is challenging because posttreatment imaging findings depend on the type of treatment, magnitude of treatment response, time interval after treatment, and other factors. To help radiologists interpret and report treatment response in a clear, simple, and standardized manner, the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) has developed a Treatment Response (LR-TR) algorithm. Introduced in 2017, the system provides criteria to categorize response of HCC to locoregional treatment (e.g., chemical ablation, energy-based ablation, transcatheter therapy, and radiation therapy). LR-TR categories include Nonevaluable, Nonviable, Equivocal, and Viable. LR-TR does not apply to patients on systemic therapies. This article reviews the LR-TR algorithm; discusses locoregional therapies for HCC, treatment concepts, and expected posttreatment findings; and illustrates LI-RADS treatment response assessment with CT and MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Voizard
- Department of Radiology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Milena Cerny
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Anis Assad
- Department of Radiology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Jean-Sébastien Billiard
- Department of Radiology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Damien Olivié
- Department of Radiology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Pierre Perreault
- Department of Radiology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Ania Kielar
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Richard K G Do
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Takeshi Yokoo
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.,Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Claude B Sirlin
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - An Tang
- Department of Radiology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Québec, Canada. .,Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada. .,Department of Radiology, Radio-oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sevim S, Dicle O, Gezer NS, Barış MM, Altay C, Akın IB. How high is the inter-observer reproducibility in the LIRADS reporting system? Pol J Radiol 2019; 84:e464-9. [PMID: 31969967 DOI: 10.5114/pjr.2019.90090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2019] [Accepted: 10/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the reproducibility of LIRADS v2014 and contribute to its widespread use in clinical practice. Material and methods This retrospective, single-centre study was conducted between January 2010 and October 2015. A total of 132 patients who had dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/computed tomography (CT) images in the Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) with liver nodule were included in the study, 37 of whom had histopathology results. Five radiologists who participated in the study, interpreted liver nodules independently on different PACS stations according to the LIRADS reporting system and its main parameters. Results We determined that level of inter-observer agreement in the LR-1, LR-5, and LR-5V categories was higher than in the LR-2, LR-3, and LR-4 categories (κ = 0.522, 0.442, and 0.600 in the LR-1, LR-5, and LR-5V categories, respectively; κ = 0.082, 0.298, and 0.143 in the LR-2, LR-3, and LR-4 categories, respectively). The parameter that we observed to have the highest level of inter-observer agreement was venous thrombus (κ = 0.600). Conclusions Our study showed that LIRADS achieves an acceptable inter-observer reproducibility in terms of clinical practice although it is insufficient at intermediate risk levels. We think that the prevalence of its use will be further increased with training related to the subject and the assignment of numerical values that express the probability of malignancy for each category and including the ancillary features in the algorithm according to clearer rules.
Collapse
|
3
|
Krishan S, Dhiman RK, Kalra N, Sharma R, Baijal SS, Arora A, Gulati A, Eapan A, Verma A, Keshava S, Mukund A, Deva S, Chaudhary R, Ganesan K, Taneja S, Gorsi U, Gamanagatti S, Madhusudan KS, Puri P, Shalimar, Govil S, Wadhavan M, Saigal S, Kumar A, Thapar S, Duseja A, Saraf N, Khandelwal A, Mukhopadyay S, Gulati A, Shetty N, Verma N. Joint Consensus Statement of the Indian National Association for Study of the Liver and Indian Radiological and Imaging Association for the Diagnosis and Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Incorporating Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2019; 9:625-651. [PMID: 31695253 PMCID: PMC6823668 DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2019.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2019] [Accepted: 07/12/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the 6th most common cancer and the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. There are currently no universally accepted practice guidelines for the diagnosis of HCC on imaging owing to the regional differences in epidemiology, target population, diagnostic imaging modalities, and staging and transplant eligibility. Currently available regional and national guidelines include those from the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD), the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver, the Japan Society of Hepatology, the Korean Liver Cancer Study Group, Hong Kong, and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network in the United States. India with its large population and a diverse health infrastructure faces challenges unique to its population in diagnosing HCC. Recently, American Association have introduced a Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LIRADS, version 2017, 2018) as an attempt to standardize the acquisition, interpretation, and reporting of liver lesions on imaging and hence improve the coherence between radiologists and clinicians and provide guidance for the management of HCC. The aim of the present consensus was to find a common ground in reporting and interpreting liver lesions pertaining to HCC on imaging keeping LIRADSv2018 in mind.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonal Krishan
- Department of Radiology, Medanta Hospital, Gurgaon, India
| | - Radha K. Dhiman
- Department of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India,Address for correspondence: Radha Krishan Dhiman, MD, DM, FACG, FRCP, FAASLD, Department of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
| | - Navin Kalra
- Department of Radiology, Postgraduate Institute Of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Raju Sharma
- Department of Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Sanjay S. Baijal
- Department of Diagnostic and Intervention Radiology, Medanta Hospital, Gurgaon, India
| | - Anil Arora
- Institute Of Liver Gastroenterology & Pancreatico Biliary Sciences, Sir Gangaram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Ajay Gulati
- Department of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Anu Eapan
- Department of Radiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Ashish Verma
- Department of Radiology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India
| | - Shyam Keshava
- Department of Radiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Amar Mukund
- Department of Intervention Radiology, Institute of liver and biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - S. Deva
- Department of Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Ravi Chaudhary
- Department of Radiology, Medanta Hospital, Gurgaon, India
| | | | - Sunil Taneja
- Department of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Ujjwal Gorsi
- Department of Radiology, Postgraduate Institute Of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | | | - Kumble S. Madhusudan
- Department of Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Pankaj Puri
- Institute Of Liver Gastroenterology & Pancreatico Biliary Sciences, Sir Gangaram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Shalimar
- Department of GastroEnterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Manav Wadhavan
- Institute of Digestive and Liver Diseases, BLK Hospital, Delhi, India
| | - Sanjiv Saigal
- Department of Hepatology, Medanta Hospital, Gurgaon, India
| | - Ashish Kumar
- Institute Of Liver Gastroenterology & Pancreatico Biliary Sciences, Sir Gangaram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Shallini Thapar
- Department of Radiology, Institute of liver and biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Ajay Duseja
- Department of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Neeraj Saraf
- Department of Hepatology, Medanta Hospital, Gurgaon, India
| | | | | | - Ajay Gulati
- Department of Radiology, Postgraduate Institute Of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Nitin Shetty
- Department of Radiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Kolkata, India
| | - Nipun Verma
- Department of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|