Clinical differences in preoperative symptoms and surgical outcomes between early and late-teen patients with Lenke type 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the clinical features and postoperative outcomes in patients with Lenke type 5C AIS in the early and late teens.

METHODS

The study included eligible patients with AIS aged < 20 years with Lenke type 5C curves who underwent selective thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) fusion. The patients were divided into two groups according to the age: younger (11-15 years) and older (16-19 years). Demographic data, radiographic parameters, and 22-item scoliosis research society questionnaire (revised) (SRS-22r) scores were compared.

RESULTS

Seventy-three (female: 69, male: 4, mean age: 15.1 years) patients were included. There were 45 and 28 patients in the younger and older groups, respectively. The older group exhibited a significantly smaller TL/L curve than the younger group, whereas no between-group differences were identified regarding curve flexibility and fusion length. The change in coronal balance and subjacent disc angle from preoperative to 2 years after surgery was significantly greater in the younger group, although each curve was equally corrected. Preoperative SRS-22r scores in the older group were significantly worse; however, they improved to the level of the younger group at 2 years after surgery. Postoperative coronal malalignment was observed in six patients (21.4%) in the older group, whereas no cases in the younger group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In patients with Lenke type 5C AIS, we showed that late teens had significantly worse SRS-22r scores than did early teens. Postoperative coronal malalignment was frequently observed in the late teens due to the reduced ability of compensation by subjacent disc wedging.

Should the upper end vertebra be selected as the upper instrumented vertebra in patients with Lenke type 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

PURPOSE

The upper end vertebra (UEV) is often selected as the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with Lenke type 5C curves; however, the effect of adjusting UIV selection one level toward the cranial side (UEV + 1) is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effect of UIV extension on scoliosis correction and global alignment in patients with the UIV as the UEV and UEV + 1.

METHODS

Data of 52 patients with AIS with Lenke type 5C curves who underwent selective thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) fusion with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided according to the UIV in relation to the UEV: the UEV and UEV + 1 groups. Radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Among the 52 patients, 24 and 28 were included in the UEV and UEV + 1 group. Baseline data showed no intergroup differences except for the UIV level. While the UEV + 1 group showed a significantly greater TL/L curve correction (72.9% vs. 62.8%, p < 0.05) and a lower UIV tilt, it showed a significantly greater absolute value of radiographic shoulder height (RSH) (- 7.9 vs. - 0.9 mm, p < 0.05) and coronal balance (- 11.0 mm vs - 4.8 mm, p < 0.05) at 2 years postoperatively. The rate of post-operative shoulder imbalance (RSH ≥ 2 cm) was significantly higher in the UEV + 1 than in the UEV group. No intergroup differences were observed in the sagittal alignment and patient outcomes between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

When the UIV was selected as the UEV + 1, correction of the TL/L curve improved; however, it increased the risk of shoulder and coronal imbalance. There is no clinical benefit observed in terms of extending the UIV to the UEV + 1; therefore, the UIV should be selected as the UEV to maintain harmonious global alignment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

Should L3 be selected as the lowest instrumented vertebra in patients with Lenke type 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis whose lowest end vertebra is L4?

OBJECTIVE

L3 is most often selected as the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) to conserve mobile segments in fusion surgery; however, in cases with the lowest end vertebra (LEV) at L4, LIV selection as L3 could have a potential risk of correction loss and coronal decompensation. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes depending on the LEV in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients with Lenke type 5C curves.

METHODS

Data from 49 AIS patients with Lenke type 5C curves who underwent selective thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) fusion to L3 as the LIV were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were classified according to their LEVs into L3 and L4 groups. In the L4 group, subanalysis was performed according to the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) level toward the upper end vertebra (UEV and 1 level above the UEV [UEV+1] subgroups). Radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes were compared between these groups.

RESULTS

Among 49 patients, 32 and 17 were in the L3 and L4 groups, respectively. The L4 group showed a lower TL/L curve correction rate and a higher subjacent disc angle postoperatively than the L3 group. Although no intergroup difference was observed in coronal balance (CB), the L4 group showed a significantly higher main thoracic (MT) and TL/L curve progression during the postoperative follow-up period than the L3 group. In the L4 group, the UEV+1 subgroup showed a higher absolute value of CB at 2 years than the UEV subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

In Lenke type 5C AIS patients with posterior selective TL/L fusion to L3 as the LIV, patients with their LEVs at L4 showed postoperative MT and TL/L curve progression; however, no significant differences were observed in global alignment and clinical outcome.