1
|
Manns A, Mahdjoub S, Ibanez G, Jarrier E, Daeipour A, Melchior M, El-Khoury F. Health professional's perception of a smoking cessation intervention among disadvantaged patients participating in a pragmatic randomized trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:993. [PMID: 37710246 PMCID: PMC10503146 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09950-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Individuals who have a low socio-economic position (SEP) are more likely to smoke and face greater barriers to quitting tobacco. However, the effectiveness of tailored interventions has been limited probably due to specific challenges relative to this population. We conducted a mixed-method study to better understand health professionals' perceptions and barriers when implementing a preference-based smoking cessation (SC) intervention among disadvantaged smokers. METHODS A self-administered online questionnaire was sent to health professionals (doctors' and other health professionals specialized in SC) participating in "STOP" a pragmatic multicentre randomized controlled trial. Perceptions regarding patient eligibility, the doctor-patient relationship, general study organization, and satisfaction were measured. RESULTS Twenty-eight STOP study investigators responded. Health professionals prioritize smoking cessation for disadvantaged patients, but face challenges in approaching and following them. A research intervention providing cessation tools based on preference was deemed useful but generally undermined by time constraints. Health professionals' preconceptions regarding patients in low SEP having other "pressing problems" which might be exacerbated by quitting smoking were also identified. Further, participation in a research intervention was perceived as not satisfactory due to workload and lack of time. CONCLUSION Our results highlight general barriers inherent to implementing pragmatic trials. They also present specific challenges in smoking cessation trials among disadvantaged population, essential to advance equity in tobacco control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurélia Manns
- Department of social epidemiology, Sorbonne Université, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, INSERM, IPLESP, 27 rue Chaligny, Paris, 75012, France
| | - Sarah Mahdjoub
- Department of social epidemiology, Sorbonne Université, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, INSERM, IPLESP, 27 rue Chaligny, Paris, 75012, France
| | - Gladys Ibanez
- Department of social epidemiology, Sorbonne Université, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, INSERM, IPLESP, 27 rue Chaligny, Paris, 75012, France
- Faculty of Medicine Pierre et Marie Curie, Department of Education and Research in General Medicine, Sorbonne Université, Paris, F75012, France
| | - Emilie Jarrier
- Department of social epidemiology, Sorbonne Université, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, INSERM, IPLESP, 27 rue Chaligny, Paris, 75012, France
| | - Ava Daeipour
- Department of social epidemiology, Sorbonne Université, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, INSERM, IPLESP, 27 rue Chaligny, Paris, 75012, France
| | - Maria Melchior
- Department of social epidemiology, Sorbonne Université, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, INSERM, IPLESP, 27 rue Chaligny, Paris, 75012, France
| | - Fabienne El-Khoury
- Department of social epidemiology, Sorbonne Université, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, INSERM, IPLESP, 27 rue Chaligny, Paris, 75012, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van der Heijden A, Te Molder H, Huma B, Jager G. To like or not to like: Negotiating food assessments of children from families with a low socioeconomic position. Appetite 2021; 170:105853. [PMID: 34896168 DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The present study explored how primary school-aged children from families with a low socioeconomic position produce 'likes' and 'dislikes' of foods during everyday family meals, and how these (dis)likes are understood and treated by their parents. It is crucial to understand how food preferences develop in the course of everyday life, as it is known that there are socioeconomic disparities in food preference and consumption, and that children from families with a low socioeconomic position have relatively poorer diets. Deploying an interactional approach to food preference, video recordings of 79 evening meals in families with a low socioeconomic position were analyzed using discursive psychology and conversation analysis. The analysis highlighted that children's food likes and dislikes were treated differently by their parents. While likes were routinely not responded to, agreed with or further elaborated, dislikes were predominantly oriented to as food refusals or treated as inappropriate, or non-genuine claims. Children's food assessments, i.e., likes and dislikes, were often disattended by parents when they appeared to be food preference displays. By contrast, assessments that accomplished social actions like refusals and complaints were more often responded to. The analysis also revealed the importance of distinguishing between assessments about food items in general, that were not currently being eaten, and assessments of food eaten here-and-now. All in all, the study evidences that and how assessment sequences open up interactional spaces where children and parents orient to and negotiate relative rights and responsibilities to know, to assess and to accomplish specific actions. Implications for food preference research are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy van der Heijden
- Wageningen University & Research, Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Stippeneng 4, 6708, WE, Wageningen, the Netherlands; Wageningen University & Research, Strategic Communication Group, Hollandseweg 1, 6707, KN, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Hedwig Te Molder
- VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Humanities: Language, Literature and Communication, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bogdana Huma
- VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Humanities: Language, Literature and Communication, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gerry Jager
- Wageningen University & Research, Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Stippeneng 4, 6708, WE, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van Heijster H, Boot CRL, Robroek SJW, Oude Hengel K, van Berkel J, de Vet E, Coenen P. The effectiveness of workplace health promotion programs on self-perceived health of employees with a low socioeconomic position: An individual participant data meta-analysis. SSM Popul Health 2021; 13:100743. [PMID: 33604445 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Revised: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of the current study was to evaluate whether workplace health promotion programs improve self-perceived health of employees with a low socioeconomic position (SEP), and whether differential effects exist between individuals with a low SEP for gender, marital status or age. Individual participant data from six Dutch intervention studies aiming at promoting healthy behavior and preventing obesity in the work setting, with a total of 1906 participants, were used. The overall intervention effect and interaction effects for gender, marital status and age were evaluated using two-stage meta-analyses with linear mixed regression models. In the first stage effect sizes of each study were estimated, which were pooled in the second stage. Compared to control conditions, workplace health promotion programs did not show an overall improvement in self-perceived health of employees with a low SEP (β0.03 (95%CI: −0.03 to 0.09)). Effects did not differ across gender, marital status and age. Future research could be focused on the determinants of self-perceived health next to health behavior to improve the health of employees with a low SEP.
Collapse
|
4
|
van der Heijden A, Te Molder H, Jager G, Mulder BC. Healthy eating beliefs and the meaning of food in populations with a low socioeconomic position: A scoping review. Appetite 2021; 161:105135. [PMID: 33493606 DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Revised: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Profound understanding of healthy eating beliefs in populations with a low socioeconomic position (SEP) can benefit attempts to improve diet quality in this population, but literature on this subject is fragmented. The purpose of this scoping review was to systematically map healthy eating beliefs and the meaning of food and eating in populations with a low SEP. Systematic search of electronic databases yielded 35 relevant publications that were included in a qualitative synthesis. Populations with a low SEP perceived healthy eating as important, although they expressed various meanings of 'healthy' and 'good' eating. Lack of time and money posed perceived barriers to healthy eating, as well as social influences, and desired identities that can be expressed by specific foods. Traditions were important influences on food and eating practices. Eating behavior was perceived as one's own responsibility and desirably within one's own control. Parents expressed the role of food to regulate children's (eating) behavior. In conclusion, perceived limited control over what is eaten due to various barriers as described by populations with a low SEP, may also be viewed as competing values. Deeper understanding of reasons and thoughts underlying healthy eating beliefs and what it means to eat 'well' is largely lacking in this domain. The findings call for an in-depth exploration of the origin and construction of beliefs regarding 'healthy' and 'good' eating in populations with a low SEP.
Collapse
|
5
|
Schaap R, Schaafsma FG, Bosma AR, Huysmans MA, Boot CRL, Anema JR. Improving the health of workers with a low socioeconomic position: Intervention Mapping as a useful method for adaptation of the Participatory Approach. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:961. [PMID: 32560709 PMCID: PMC7304135 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09028-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Workers with a low socioeconomic position (SEP) have a higher risk for health problems and premature dropout from the workforce. Unfavorable working conditions and unhealthy behaviors are more prevalent among this group of workers. The Participatory Approach (PA), is an evidence-based method to identify and solve problems at the workplace related to health issues of the worker. Health problems among workers with a low SEP are usually caused by an interplay of problems in and outside the workplace. To solve health problems on multiple life domains for workers with a low SEP we aim to adapt this approach to a broader perspective. Methods An Intervention Mapping (IM) protocol was used to adapt the PA. First, a needs assessment was conducted combining literature with data from interviews and focus groups with workers with a low SEP, employers and occupational health professionals (OHPs). Based on the needs assessment a program goal and performance and change objectives were defined, which resulted in methods and practical strategies to solve problems on multiple life domains. Based on the results of these steps, the PA was adapted and an implementation and evaluation plan were developed. Results The needs assessment confirmed that an interplay of problems on multiple life domains affect work functioning and health of workers with a low SEP. Moreover, they perceived difficulties with solving problems or used passive or avoidant coping styles towards these problems. The program goal is to identify and solve problems on multiple life domains that affect healthy functioning at work. To achieve this workers need support from OHPs to solve problems. The PA protocol and materials were adapted using theoretical concepts of the Self-Determination Theory (SDT), which resulted in the Grip on Health intervention. For OHPs a training was developed on how to implement this intervention in practice. The intervention will be evaluated in a pilot implementation study among workers with a low SEP and other relevant stakeholders. Conclusions IM was a valuable tool for the adaptation of the PA to better support workers with a low SEP to improve their work functioning and health from a broader perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Schaap
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - F G Schaafsma
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A R Bosma
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M A Huysmans
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C R L Boot
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J R Anema
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ramanadhan S, Nagler RH, McCloud R, Kohler R, Viswanath K. Graphic health warnings as activators of social networks: A field experiment among individuals of low socioeconomic position. Soc Sci Med 2017; 175:219-227. [PMID: 28108053 PMCID: PMC5320580 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2016] [Revised: 12/20/2016] [Accepted: 12/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE Graphic health warnings (GHWs) on cigarette packages present an important tobacco control opportunity, particularly for vulnerable populations suffering a disproportionate tobacco burden. One mechanism by which GHWs may influence smoking outcomes is by prompting interpersonal discussions within health discussion networks (the set of personal contacts with whom an individual discusses health issues). OBJECTIVE The study examined the association between GHW-prompted conversations within health discussion networks and key tobacco-related outcomes, with attention to valence and content of the discussions. METHOD Between August 2013 and April 2014, we recruited 1200 individuals from three communities in Massachusetts, emphasizing recruitment of individuals of low socioeconomic position (SEP) and members of other selected vulnerable groups. Respondents were exposed to the nine GHWs proposed by the FDA in 2011, asked a series of questions, and assessed at follow-up a few weeks later. RESULTS A total of 806 individuals were included in this analysis. About 51% of respondents reported having a health discussion network, with significantly lower reports among African-Americans and Hispanics compared to Whites. Around 70% of respondents (smokers and nonsmokers) with health discussion networks reported having one or more conversations about the GHWs with network members, the bulk of which were negative and focused on warning others about smoking. For smokers, we found a small but positive association between the percentage of network conversations that were negative and reports of quit attempts. CONCLUSION The results point to a potential mechanism by which GHWs may impact tobacco-related outcomes, prompting further inquiry into the role of health discussion networks (and discussion networks, more broadly) in tobacco control among low SEP individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoba Ramanadhan
- Center for Community-based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW601, Boston, MA 02215, United States; Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
| | - Rebekah H Nagler
- School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Minnesota, 206 Church St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.
| | - Rachel McCloud
- Center for Community-based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW601, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
| | - Racquel Kohler
- Center for Community-based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW601, Boston, MA 02215, United States; Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
| | - Kasisomayajula Viswanath
- Center for Community-based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW601, Boston, MA 02215, United States; Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
| |
Collapse
|