MET fusions are targetable genomic variants in the treatment of advanced malignancies

Targeted therapy for malignancies has developed rapidly in recent years, benefiting patients harboring genetic mutations sensitive to relevant tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). With the development of targeted sequencing techniques, an increasing number of detectable genomic alterations in malignancies, including MET fusions, have been revealed. MET fusions, although rare among malignancies, might be functional driver genes that participate in activating downstream signaling pathways and promoting cell proliferation. Therefore, it is believed that MET fusions could be targetable genomic variants of MET, and inhibition of MET is considered an optionable therapeutic choice for patients harboring MET fusions. According to the summary presented in this review, we recommend MET-TKIs as suitable treatment agents for patients harboring primary MET fusions. For patients harboring acquired MET fusions after the development of resistance to TKIs targeting primary genomic alterations, such as sensitive EGFR mutations, treatment with a MET-TKI alone or in combination with TKIs targeting primary genomic alterations, such as EGFR-TKIs, is hypothesized to be a reasonable option for salvage treatment. In summary, MET fusions, despite their low incidence, should be taken into consideration when developing treatment strategies for cancer patients.

Identification of MET fusions as novel therapeutic targets sensitive to MET inhibitors in lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Alterations in the MET gene, including amplifications and exon 14 skipping mutations, have been identified as actionable oncogenic alterations. However, MET fusions are rarely detected in lung cancer, and their sensitivity to therapeutics has not been systematically analyzed.

METHODS

The data from 30876 lung cancer patients from the LAVA database and 7966 patients from cBioPortal database were screened. Basic demographic and clinical information for the patients harboring MET fusions were collected. A lung squamous cell cancer patient harboring a novel EML4-MET fusion was treated with crizotinib. Additionally, a literature review was performed to summarize the cases of patients harboring MET fusions and their treatment information.

RESULTS

MET fusions were found in only 0.2% to 0.3% of lung cancer patients and appeared in almost all exons of the MET gene. Intragenic MET fusions were found in 52.6% (41/78) of the included patients. Crizotinib was effective for MET fusions, including a novel identified EML4-MET fusion, even after the failure of multiple lines of treatment. This result suggested that acquired MET fusions become more regionally selective, as they usually occurred in exons encoding the extracellular region. Interestingly, the MET-fused genes in primary MET fusions or acquired MET fusions were very different, which indicated the different functions and influences of the disease.

CONCLUSION

MET fusions are rare, and half of the fusion types were intragenic fusions. Lung cancer patients harboring primary or acquired MET fusions could benefit from crizotinib. In addition, EML4-MET was first reported in this study as a novel MET fusion type.

Response and acquired resistance to MET inhibitors in de novo MET fusion-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

De novo mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET) gene fusions in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are a promising target for MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We aimed to examine the response to targeted therapy with MET TKIs and resistance mechanisms in de novo MET fusion-positive NSCLC as these have not been comprehensively explored.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined the MET fusions in 4,429 patients with advanced-stage NSCLC using targeted next-generation sequencing and validated the results using RT-PCR. We analyzed cellular models harboring MET fusions and established a patient-derived organoid (PDO) model.

RESULTS

We identified 13 (0.29 %, 13/4429) patients with de novo MET fusions and found EPHB4, THAP5, TNPO3, and DST as novel MET fusion partners. The most common concomitant gene with MET fusions was TP53 mutations. Among 12 patients receiving MET TKI treatment, two achieved stable disease, six achieved partial response, and four underwent progressive disease. An in vitro study showed that EPHB4-MET is a functional driver gene. MET inhibitors significantly inhibited the proliferation and phosphorylation of downstream STAT3, AKT, and ERK1/2 in EPHB4-MET overexpressing cells. Acquired MET D1228H/N or D1246N mutations were found in patients harboring MET fusions after acquiring resistance to MET TKIs. Tivantinib showed optimal suppression efficacy in a PDO model with an acquired MET D1228N mutation.

CONCLUSION

MET fusions occur in a rare subset of patients with NSCLC and represent a promising therapeutic target. MET secondary mutations D1228H/N or D1246N present the potential resistance mechanisms of MET inhibitors in patients with de novo MET fusions.