The use of low dose CT scouts for MR safety screening: A multi-reader evaluation

INTRODUCTION

Plain film radiographs are recommended to assist in MRI safety screening of patients with unknown medical histories, especially in an emergency setting where patients might be unable to answer a safety questionnaire. This study assesses the performance of CT scout images, which have low radiation dose and are faster and easier to acquire compared to plain film radiographs, in finding and naming a range of head and body implants.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 40 CT Head and Neck (HN) scout images and 40 CT Chest, Abdomen and Pelvis (CAP) scout images was undertaken. A subset of these were chosen to include a range of common internal implants not identifiable externally to the patient. The images were assessed by three readers with varying levels of clinical experience in MRI who were asked to find and name any implants seen.

RESULTS

Collectively, all readers reached a sensitivity of 85 % in finding internal implants, regardless of their clinical experience or experience in reviewing CT images, and a minimum specificity of 95 %. Implants were correctly named in 74 % of the images presented.

CONCLUSION

CT scout images were able to reveal most of the implants included. However, clinical experience in reviewing the images enhances a reader's ability to identify the type of implant.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

In an emergency setting, imaging can be critical in the management of patients presenting with acute illnesses. In the unconscious or unresponsive patient, the use of CT scouts, where this is the only option available, could provide valuable MRI safety information prior to a scan, improving access to the MRI scan in a timely manner.

Safety of active auditory implants in magnetic resonance imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become the gold standard for the diagnosis of many pathologies. Using MRI in patients with auditory implants can however raise concerns due to mutual interactions between the implant and imaging device, resulting in potential patient risks. Several implant manufacturers have been working towards more MRI safe devices. Older devices are however often labelled for more stringent conditions, possibly creating confusion with patients and professionals. With this myriad of different devices that are implanted in patients for lifetimes of at least 20 years, it is crucial that both patients and professionals have a clear understanding of the safety of their devices. This work aims at providing an exhaustive overview on the MRI safety of active auditory implants. The available industry standards that are followed by manufacturers are outlined and an overview of the latest scientific developments focusing on the last five years is provided. In addition, based on the analysis of the adverse events reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and in literature within the past ten years, a systematic review of the most commonly occurring issues for patients with auditory implants in the MRI environment is provided. Results indicate that despite the release of more MRI conditional active hearing implants on the market, adverse events still occur. An extensive overview is provided on the MRI safety of active auditory implants, aiming to increase the understanding of the topic for healthcare professionals and contribute to safer scanning conditions for patients.

Feasibility of MRI in patients with non-Pacemaker/Defibrillator metallic devices and abandoned leads

Objective

To evaluate feasibility of MRI in patients with non-pacemaker (PM)/ Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) metallic devices and abandoned leads.

Background

Relative safety of MRI performed using specified protocol has been established in MR non-conditional PM/ICDs. With limited safety data, many non-PM/ICD metallic devices and abandoned leads continue to be a contraindication for MRI.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with extra-cardiac devices, non-programmable cardiac devices, and abandoned leads, who underwent MRI (GE 1.5 Tesla, WI) at a single tertiary care center over a span of 13 years. Scan protocol was designed to maintain specific absorption rate (SAR) < 4.0 W/kg and scan time < 60 minutes.

Results

The cohort comprised 127 MRI exams representing 94 patients, with 13 patients having two or more scans. The devices consisted of: 23 vagal nerve stimulators (VNS), 22 implantable loop recorders, 16 spinal stimulators, 5 peripheral nerve stimulators, 3 bladder stimulators, 2 deep brain stimulators, 1 gastric stimulator, 1 bone stimulator, 1 WATCHMAN device, 22 abandoned PM/lCD leads and 1 VNS lead. There was no immediate (peri-MRI exam) morbidity or mortality. Patients did not report any discomfort, palpitations, heating, or sensation of device migration during the exam. Local follow-up data was available in 65% (100% for thoracic imaging) with a mean of 190±475 days (median 13 days). No device malfunction reported during follow-up.

Conclusions

With appropriate precautions, MRI is feasible in patients with extracardiac devices, nonprogrammable cardiac devices, and abandoned leads.

Elements of Effective Patient Screening to Improve Safety in MRI

Conducting magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety screening is not a new idea and has developed as a proved method in efforts to ensure patient safety and prevent accidents in the magnetic resonance (MR) environment. A growing number of surgical procedures with implanted medical devices have complicated MR screening and added to the workload of Level 2 personnel. Level 2 staff members are trained to understand and implement screening procedures and should be consulted by all individuals requiring access to the MR environment. All the steps have potential gaps, but as a whole offer efficient and effective tools to alleviate MR-related accidents.

Assessment of MRI issues for a new cerebral spinal fluid shunt, gravitational valve (GV)

PURPOSE

A gravitational valve (GV) may be used to treat hydrocephalus, offering possible advantages that include avoidance of over drainage and long-term complications. Because a GV is made from metal, there are potential safety and other problems related to the use of MRI. The objective of this investigation was to evaluate MRI-related issues (i.e., magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts) for a newly developed, metallic GV.

METHODS

Tests were performed on the GV (GAV 2.0) using well-accepted techniques to assess magnetic field interactions (translational attraction and torque, 3-Tesla), MRI-related heating (1.5-T/64-MH and 3-T/128-MHz, whole body averaged SAR, 2.7-W/kg and 2.9-W/kg, respectively), artifacts (3-Tesla; gradient echo and T1-weighted, spin echo sequences), and possible functional changes related to exposures to different MRI conditions (exposing six samples each to eight different pulse sequences at 1.5-T/64-MHz and 3-T/128-MHz).

RESULTS

Magnetic field interactions were not substantial (deflection angle 2°, no torque) and heating was minor (highest temperature rise, ≥1.9°C, highest background temperature rise, ≥1.7°C). Artifacts on the gradient echo pulse sequence extended approximately 10mm from the size and shape of the GV. The different exposures to 1.5-T/64-MHz and 3-T/128-MHz conditions did not alter or damage the operational aspects of the GV samples.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings demonstrated that MRI can be safely used in patients with this GV and, thus, this metallic implant is deemed acceptable or "MR Conditional" (i.e., using current labeling terminology), according to the conditions used in this study.