Oral Versus Subcutaneous Methotrexate in Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Disorders: an Update of the Current Literature

PURPOSE

This review aims to critically evaluate the potential benefit of either oral or subcutaneous administration of methotrexate (MTX) in various immune-mediated inflammatory disorders (IMIDs) through analysis of efficacy, toxicity, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of both administration routes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies comparing the efficacy of oral versus subcutaneous MTX administration in IMIDs have revealed contradicting results. Some reported higher efficacy with subcutaneous administration, while others found no significant difference. Regarding toxicity, some studies have challenged the notion that subcutaneous administration is better tolerated than oral administration, while others have supported this. Pharmacokinetic studies suggest higher plasma bioavailability and increased accumulation of MTX-polyglutamates (MTX-PGs) in red blood cells (RBCs) with subcutaneous administration during the initial treatment phase. However, after several months, similar intracellular drug levels are observed with both administration routes. There is no conclusive evidence supporting the superiority of either oral or subcutaneous MTX administration in terms of efficacy and adverse events in IMIDs. Subcutaneous administration leads to higher plasma bioavailability and initial accumulation of MTX-PGs in RBCs, but the difference seems to disappear over time. Given the variable findings, the choice of administration route may be based on shared decision-making, offering patients the option of either oral or subcutaneous administration of MTX based on individual preferences and tolerability. Further research is needed to better understand the impact of MTX-PGs in various blood cells and TDM on treatment response and adherence to MTX therapy.

Methotrexate polyglutamate quantification for clinical application in patients with pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia in association with genetic polymorphisms

We developed and validated a quantification method for methotrexate (MTX) polyglutamates (MTX-PGs, MTX-PG1 to MTX-PG5) by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry using stable isotope-labeled internal standards and applied to 196 clinical samples collected from pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients treated with MTX. MTX-PGs levels and their proportions (%) in sum of all MTX-PGs (MTXSum) were evaluated in relation to TPMT, NUDT15, and MTHFR genotypes. For the developed method, linearity ranges 1-500 nmol/L, bias for accuracy 0.3-13.5 %, coefficient of variation for within- and between-run imprecision of 3.2-9.5% and 1.5-12.0%, respectively. Recoveries achieved were 74.2-105.8 %. There was no significant carryover. The median level of the MTXSum for 196 clinical samples was 129.4 nmol/L (interquartile range 28.1-241.2). MTX dose and MTX-PGs were associated (P < 0.05) and among five MTX-PGs, MTX-PG3 was the predominant form (median 41.7 %). The MTX-PG3 level was significantly higher in patients with TPMT *1/*3C than in patients with wild type and MTX-PG3% was significantly higher and MTX-PG5% was significantly lower in NUDT15 intermediate metabolizers than normal or indeterminate phenotypes (P < 0.05). This validated MTX-PGs quantification method can facilitate a better understanding of MTX metabolism and therapeutic drug monitoring for MTX treatment.

Methotrexate polyglutamate levels and co-distributions in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia maintenance therapy

PURPOSE

Methotrexate polyglutamates (MTXpg) facilitate incorporation of thioguanine nucleotides into DNA (DNA-TG, the primary cytotoxic thiopurine metabolite and outcome determinant in MTX/6-mercaptopurine treatment of childhood ALL). We hypothesized that mapping erythrocyte levels of MTXpg with 1-6 glutamates and their associations with DNA-TG formation would facilitate future guidelines for maintenance therapy dosing.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Summed MTX with 1-6 glutamates resolved by LCMS [median (interquartile): 5.47 (3.58-7.69) nmol/mmol hemoglobin] was in agreement with total MTX by radio ligand assay. In 16,389 blood samples from 1426 ALL maintenance therapy patients, MTXpg3 21.0 (15.2-27.4)% was the predominant metabolite, and MTXpg1 (the maternal drug) constituted 38.6 (27.2-50.2)% of MTXpg1-6. All subsets correlated; the strongest associations were between metabolites with similar polyglutamate lengths. Correlations of MTXpg1 with MTXpg2 and MTXpg3,4,5,6 were r_s = 0.68 and r_s = 0.25-0.42, respectively. Intercorrelations of MTXpg3,4,5,6 were all r_s ≥ 0.51. MTXpg4 accounted for 29.8 (24.7-33.3)% of MTXpg3-6, yet explained 96% of the summed MTXpg3-6 variation. MTXpg1-4, MTXpg1-6, MTXpg2-6 and MTXpg3 were all associated with DNA-TG levels (p < 0.00001), but collinearity precluded identification of the most informative subset.

CONCLUSIONS

Measuring erythrocyte MTXpg4 simplifies and can replace longer chain MTXpg monitoring. Resolving individual MTXpg identifies samples that are unsuitable for dose guidance due to high levels of MTXpg1 remaining in the plasma fraction because of recent MTX intake. All tested MTXpg subsets correlated with DNA-TG and may be used for ALL maintenance therapy dose adjustments, but the most informative subset remains to be identified.