What is the Preferable Method for the C3 and C7 Segments in Unilateral Open-Door Laminoplasty for Patients Diagnosed with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy?

BACKGROUND

Traditional C3-C7 unilateral open-door laminoplasty (UOLP) often leads to various postoperative complications as a result of damage of cervical posterior muscles and nuchal ligaments. We aimed to thoroughly evaluate postoperative outcomes after our modified UOLP versus traditional UOLP in treating multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM).

METHODS

Seventy-six patients with MCSM who underwent the modified UOLP with C3 laminectomy and C7 upper hemilaminectomy (40 patients) or traditional C3-C7 UOLP (36 patients) were included. Preoperative and postoperative cervical radiologic parameters, as well as clinical and surgical outcomes, were evaluated.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores improved significantly more in the modified UOLP group than in the traditional UOLP group (P = 0.028), whereas visual analog scale scores and Neck Disability Index improved similarly in both groups. Follow-up scores for Japanese Orthopaedic Association, Neck Disability Index, and visual analog scale were not significantly different between the 2 groups. At the final follow-up, the C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis and T1 slope increased in the traditional UOLP group and did not change in the modified UOLP group and were unchanged in the modified UOLP group. The C2-C7 Cobb angle decreased significantly in the traditional UOLP group and did not change in the modified UOLP group. The modified UOLP group lost less cervical posterior muscle area compared with the traditional UOLP group (3.72% ± 3.54% vs. 6.67% ± 2.81%; P < 0.001). The range of motion in the modified UOLP group was significantly greater than in the traditional UOLP group at the final follow-up (P < 0.001). Also, the modified UOLP group experienced a notable reduction in operative time, blood loss volume, and postoperative hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend performing our modified UOLP with C3 laminectomy and C7 upper hemilaminectomy instead of traditional C3-C7 UOLP.

Symptomatic retro-odontoid pseudotumor causing calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate deposition combined with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Introduction

Symptomatic retro-odontoid pseudotumor (ROP) caused by cervical compression and myelopathy is rare. Pathological diagnosis is recommended for differential diagnosis including the following: inflammatory disease, primary bone tumor, metastatic disease and calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate deposition (CPPD) also known as “crowned dens syndrome”. The authors report a rare case of ROP caused by CPPD deposition combined with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM) which was treated by tumor resectioning using a transoral approach combined with posterior decompression and fusion.

Case presentation

A 66-year-old male presented with progressive neck pain and spastic gait with no history of trauma. Radiographic imaging revealed degenerative change involving the atlanto-axial and atlanto-occipital joints with calcified enhancing soft tissue around the odontoid process causing cord compression and cervical instability at the C1-C2 level combined with MCSM and spinal cord compression at C3 to C7. Microscopic assisted transoral tumor resection combined with posterior decompression and fusion was performed at the occiput to T2. The pathology report describes a rhomboid-shaped crystal caused by calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate deposition (CPPD) disease. At the 6-month follow-up following the operation, the patient's neck pain and spastic gait were improved compared to the preoperative examination.

Discussion

Cervical compression and myelopathy from ROP causing CPPD combined with MCSM is rare. Pathology diagnosis and surgical management are highly recommended.

Conclusion

In this case, a combined surgical approach: tumor resection using a transoral approach and a posterior approach for decompression and fusion at occiput to T2 was an effective option for this condition.

•

Symptomatic retro-odontoid pseudotumor (ROP) caused by calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate deposition (CPPD) combined with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM) is rare.

•

Pathology diagnosis and surgical management are highly recommended.

•

Tumor resectioning using a transoral approach and posterior approach for decompression and fusion from the occiput to T2 is an effective option.

A biomechanical analysis of four anterior cervical techniques to treating multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a finite element study

BACKGROUND

The decision to treat multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM) remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to compare the biomechanical characteristics of the intervertebral discs at the adjacent segments and internal fixation, and to provide scientific experimental evidence for surgical treatment of MCSM.

METHODS

An intact C2-C7 cervical spine model was developed and validated. Four additional models were developed from the fusion model, including multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (mACDF), anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF), hybrid decompression and fusion (HDF), and mACDF with cage alone (mACDF-CA). Biomechanical characteristics on the plate and the disc of adjacent levels (C2/3, C6/7) were comparatively analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the four models, stress on the upper (C2/3) adjacent intervertebral disc was the lowest in the mACDF-CA group and highest in the ACCF group. Stress on the intervertebral discs at adjacent segments was higher for the upper C2/3 than the lower C6/7 intervertebral disc. In all models, the mACDF-CA group had the lowest stress on the intervertebral disc, while the ACCF group had the highest stress. In the three surgical models with titanium plate fixation (mACDF, ACCF, and HDF), the ACCF group had the highest stress at the titanium plate-screw interface, while the mACDF group had the lowest stress.

CONCLUSION

Among the four anterior cervical reconstructive techniques for MCSM, mACDF-CA makes little effect on the adjacent disc stress, which might reduce the incidence of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) after fusion. However, the accompanying risk of the increased incidence of cage subsidence should never be neglected.

Influence of SCA on clinical outcomes and cervical alignment after laminoplasty in patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Background

To study the impact of changes in spino-cranial angle (SCA) on sagittal alignment and to investigate the relationship between SCA and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores after laminoplasty (LP)

Material and methods

In total, 72 patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM) after laminoplasty (LP) were retrospectively enrolled. Based on the optimal cut-off values of preoperative SCA, patients were classified into low SCA and high SCA groups. Radiographic data were measured, including spino-cranial angle (SCA), T1-slope (T1s), C2–7 lordosis (CA), T1s minus CA (T1sCA), and C2–7 sagittal vertical axis (cSVA). JOA and NDI scores were both applied to assess postoperative and follow-up clinical efficacy. Pearson correlation coefficient and linear regression analysis were respectively calculated between radiographic data and between SCA and NDI.

Results

The preoperative SCA was significantly correlated with T1s (r = − 0.795), CA (r = − 0.857), and cSVA (r = 0.915). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve model predicted a threshold of SCA (value of 85.2°). At the follow-up period, patients with lower SCA had a higher T1s and CA and a lower cSVA, simultaneously accompanied by greater △T1s, △CA, and △cSVA. The linear regression model demonstrated that SCA in the higher group was positively correlated with NDI, and patients with higher SCA had worse NDI scores (pre: p < 0.001; post: p < 0.001; F/U: p = 0.003) and greater changes of NDI (post: p < 0.010; F/U: p = 0.002).

Conclusion

SCA may be a good predictor of evaluating sagittal balance and planning surgery. Changes in sagittal alignment in the low SCA group were affected more easily, and a higher SCA was associated with worse quality of life. Laminoplasty could be a good choice for patients with lower SCA.

Anterior versus posterior approach for the therapy of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

The goal of this meta-analysis is to explore the overall efficacy as well as the safety of anterior versus posterior approach for the therapy of patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy based on qualified studies.

METHODS

Three electronic databases, PubMed, Cochrane, Embase were searched updated to January 2018 to identify all relevant and qualified studies using the index words. The qualified studies were including prospective or retrospective comparative studies. Relative risk (RR) and mean difference (MD) along with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used to analyze the main outcomes.

RESULTS

In this meta-analysis, there were a total of 24 studies with 959 patients in the anterior approach group and 1072 patients in the posterior approach group. The final results showed, in comparison of the posterior approach group, the anterior approach group significantly increased the JOA score (SMD: 0.36, 95% CI 0.10-0.62), the operation time (WMD: 49.87, 95% CI 17.67-82.08), and the neurological recovery rate (WMD: 10.55, 95% CI 3.99-17.11) with higher complication rate (RR: 1.53, 95% CI 1.24-1.89). Besides, there was no significant difference of the blood loss (SMD: - 0.40, 95% CI - 1.12 to 0.32) and ROM (SMD: - 0.28, 95% CI - 0.78 to - 0.22) between posterior approach group and anterior approach group.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies found a significant increase of JOA score as well as neurological recovery rate by the anterior approach treatment when compared with posterior approach treatment. However, increased operation time and complications could also occur through the anterior approach treatment. More high-quality randomized controlled trials with larger sample size, multi-centric and longer follow-ups are needed to support our current conclusions.

Combined expansive open-door laminoplasty with short-segment lateral mass instrumented fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy with short segment instability

OBJECTIVES

Expansive open-door laminoplasty (EOLP) is an effective procedure for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM). It preserves a higher range of cervical motion than laminectomy with fusion and reserves more posterior elements than laminectomy alone. MCSM with short-segment instability or correctable local kyphosis often requires long-segment decompression and adequate segment fusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 20 patients who received EOLP with short-segment posterior lateral mass instrumented fusion at our institution from 2008 to 2011. The follow-up period was at least 36 months. Postoperative functional and radiographic outcomes were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Japanese Orthopedic Association scores improved significantly 36 months after surgery and the average recovery ratio was 85.3 ± 14.7%. Nurick disability scores and neck pain visual analog scale scores considerably decreased 3 years after surgery. No patients had aggravated neck pain or C5 nerve palsy during follow-up. The preservation of range of motion was approximately 60% after 36 months. No implant loosening or laminar collapse was reported on radiographic follow-up.

CONCLUSION

EOLP with concomitant lateral mass instrumented fusion yields favorable short-term clinical results for MCSM with short segment instability.

Hybrid Decompression Technique Versus Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion for Treating Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Which One Is Better?

BACKGROUND

The hybrid decompression technique (corpectomy combined with discectomy) and anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion (ACCF) both provide good neurological recovery and disease stabilization for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). However, no single study has been large enough to determine definitively which one is superior for this condition.

OBJECTIVE

A meta-analysis was conducted to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of the hybrid decompression technique versus ACCF for the treatment of multilevel CSM.

METHODS

Electronic databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were selected to search for potentially relevant trials up to April 2015 that compared the outcomes of the hybrid technique with ACCF for the treatment of multilevel CSM. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed according to Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. The outcome assessments were duration of surgery, blood loss, Cobb angle of C2-C7, segment angle, fusion rate, Japanese Orthopedics Association score, Neck Disability Index, and complications. The results were expressed as the odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous outcomes and the mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Five controlled clinical trials published between 2009 and 2013, involving 356 patients (hybrid, 196; ACCF, 160) with 3- or 4-level CSM were retrieved in this study. Overall, there were significant differences between the 2 treatment groups for blood loss (MD = -38.69, 95% CI = -54.62 to -22.76, P < 0.01), fusion rate (OR = 2.56, 95% CI = 1.11 to 5.93, P = 0.03), and complications (OR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.43, P < 0.01). However, no significant differences were found for duration of surgery (MD = -4.50, 95% CI = -22.902 to 13.91, P = 0.63), Cobb angle of C2-C7 after surgery (MD = 3.32, 95% CI = -3.72 to 10.37, P = 0.35), segment angle after surgery (MD = 2.87, 95% CI = -2.47 to 8.21, P = 0.29), Japanese Orthopedics Association score (MD = -0.07, 95% CI = -0.36 to 0.22, P = 0.62), or Neck Disability Index (MD = -0.86, 95% CI = -3.26 to 1.54, P = 0.48).

CONCLUSION

Based on this meta-analysis, both the hybrid technique and ACCF can achieve good results for CSM. However, the hybrid technique is associated with significantly less blood loss, complications, and a higher fusion rate than ACCF.