Clinical and immunological characteristics and prognosis of patients with autoantibody negative dermatomyositis: a case control study

OBJECTIVES

Myositis-specific antibodies (MSAs) and myositis-associated antibodies (MAAs) are associated with distinctive dermatomyositis (DM) clinical phenotypes. The aim of this study is to explicate the clinical and immunological features of MSAs-negative DM patients.

METHODS

A total of 515 individuals diagnosed with DM was screened from 2013 to 2022 and 220 DM patients were enrolled in this retrospective cohort. Clinical and laboratory data of these patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

MSAs-negative DM patients were categorized into two groups: MAAs-negative (MSAs (-)/MAAs (-)) group and MAAs-positive (MSAs (-)/MAAs (+)) group. The percentage of Raynaud's phenomenon (P=0.026) was higher in the MSAs (-)/MAAs (+) DM patients than the MSAs-positive DM patients and MSAs (-)/MAAs (-) DM patients. The proportion of rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD) in the MSAs-negative DM patients was lower than that in the MSAs-positive group. The MSAs (-)/MAAs (+) group had a higher proportion of organizing pneumonia and usual interstitial pneumonia (P=0.011), and elevated eosinophils in their bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (P=0.008). Counts of lymphocytes (P=0.001) and CD16+CD56+ natural killer (NK) cells (P=0.012) were higher in the MSAs-negative group. Additionally, the percentage of CD4+TNFα+ (P=0.040), CD4+IFNγ+ (P=0.037), and CD4+IL-2+ (P=0.018) cells among total CD4+ T cells were higher in the MSA-negative DM patients compared with the MSAs-positive DM patients. Besides, MSAs-negative patients demonstrated a more favorable prognosis than MSAs-positive patients. Multivariable regression analysis identified advanced onset age, higher level of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and RP-ILD as risk factors for mortality in DM patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with MSAs-positive group, MSAs-negative DM patients suffered less from organ involvement compared with MSAs-positive group and tend to have better prognosis. Key Points MSAs-negative DM patients exhibited distinct characteristics in comparison with MSAs-positive DM patients:   • The MSAs (-)/MAAs (+) DM patients demonstrated a higher prevalence of organizing pneumonia (OP) and usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), and elevated eosinophil counts in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.   • CEA levels were lower in MSAs-negative patients compared with MSAs-positive patients.   • Elevated counts of lymphocytes and CD16+CD56+ NK cells were identified in the MSAs-negative patients. Additionally, proportions of CD4+TNFα+, CD4+IFNγ+, and CD4+IL-2+ cells among total CD4+ T cells were higher in the MSAs-negative DM patients compared with DM MSAs-positive DM patients.   • MSAs-negative DM patients had a more favorable prognosis than MSAs-positive DM patients. A multivariable regression analysis revealed the advanced onset age, high CEA levels, and RP-ILD were risk factors for mortality in DM patients.

Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are a diverse group of diseases characterized by proximal muscle weakness and inflammation in skeletal muscle. Phenotypically, the subtypes include dermatomyositis, polymyositis, inclusion body myositis, and amyopathic dermatomyositis. The most common IIM in children is juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM). In contrast to adult dermatomyositis (DM), children are likely to have frequent relapses, vasculopathy, and long-term metabolic and other complications like lipodystrophy, insulin resistance, and calcinosis. Significant advances in our understanding of pathogenesis, disease course, and treatment of JDM has changed the therapeutic landscape and improved outcomes in children. Myositis-specific autoantibodies and myositis-associated autoantibodies have unique clinical associations, disease course and help predict response to therapy. A multidisciplinary approach including exercise programs and psychosocial support is essential. The first line of treatment is a combination of corticosteroids and methotrexate (MTX). Other targeted immunosuppressive therapy is used in refractory cases. Early recognition and timely referral to a specialist center remain pivotal to improving the mortality and morbidity associated with this disease.

[Myositis: from diagnosis to treatment]

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory diseases of the skeletal muscle are important, often severe diseases with a considerable impact on the quality of life. In addition to muscle weakness there is often involvement of other organs, such as the heart, lungs and esophagus with symptoms such as dyspnea or dysphagia.

PURPOSE

A fast and effective treatment is only possible by an early and reliable diagnosis according to current national and international standards.

METHODS

The diagnostic repertoire includes autoantibody testing, imaging, muscle biopsy, detection of extramuscular manifestations, e.g., by high-resolution lung computed tomography (CT) and an individualized tumor search. An optimal treatment and the avoidance of irreversible damage, such as a loss of walking ability, are only possible through a good interdisciplinary cooperation including neurology or pediatrics, rheumatology, dermatology, neuropathology, pulmonology and cardiology.

RESULTS

In addition to standard immunosuppression with glucocorticosteroids, azathioprine or methotrexate, escalation treatment with rituximab is now well established. Interdisciplinary treatment according to national and international standards, such as guidelines on myositis, should be coordinated at qualified centers of excellence.

DISCUSSION

Helpful resources are the MYOSITIS NETZ ( www.myositis-netz.de ) and the International Myositis Society (iMyoS; www.imyos.org ).

Environmental factors associated with juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathy clinical and serologic phenotypes

BACKGROUND

Environmental exposures have been associated with the juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (JIIM). We undertook a questionnaire-based study to evaluate patient-reported exposures as possible risk factors for JIIM.

FINDINGS

One-hundred-seven patients with JIIM were enrolled in a myositis natural history protocol and completed environmental questionnaires. Frequencies of exposures in clinical and myositis-specific autoantibody (MSA) groups were examined. Patients with juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) and juvenile connective tissue myositis (JCTM) more frequently received an immunization within 1 year of diagnosis compared to juvenile polymyositis (57.5 and 71.4% vs 0.0%, p ≤ 0.017). JCTM patients were more often underweight at diagnosis relative to JDM patients (42.9% vs 7.0%, p = 0.002). MSA-negative patients more frequently had gastroenteritis within a year of diagnosis compared to patients with anti-MDA5 autoantibodies (28.6% vs 0.0%, p = 0.032). Heavy exercise was more frequent in MSA-negative and anti-MDA5 groups compared to the anti-TIF-1 autoantibody group (42.9 and 35.3% vs. 9.0%, p ≤ 0.047). Medications received within 1 year of diagnosis were more frequent in MSA-negative patients relative to those with anti-MDA5 autoantibodies (92.9% vs. 52.8% p = 0.045). Being breastfed > 6 months was more frequent in MSA-negative patients (88.9%) compared to anti-TIF-1 and anti-MDA5 autoantibody groups (41.2 and 28.6%, p ≤ 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

Certain environmental exposures prior to diagnosis differed among clinical and serologic subgroups of JIIM, suggesting additional exposures to be explored as possible risk factors for JIIM phenotypes.

Juvenile dermatomyositis: advances in clinical presentation, myositis-specific antibodies and treatment

BACKGROUND

Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is a chronic autoimmune disease characteristic by inflammation of small vessels within the skin, muscle and vital organs. But the clinical features and treatment of JDM have not been fully clarified.

DATA SOURCES

Databases underwent through PubMed for articles about the clinical features, myositis-specific antibodies of JDM and its treatment, and we selected publications written in English which were relevant to the topic of this review.

RESULTS

Clinical features and myositis-specific antibodies may predict the severity and prognosis of disease. Although the mortality rate has been lower with traditional treatments, such as corticosteroid, intravenous immunoglobulin, and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs such as methotrexate, their usages are variable. Novel biological therapies seem to be effective for refractory JDM patients, but more clinical trials are necessary.

CONCLUSIONS

JDM is a sever disease of childhood. We need to better understand recent advances of JDM in the context of clinical features including skin manifestations, muscle weakness and organ damage, myositis-specific antibodies and their associated outcomes and the treatment of disease.

Medications received by patients with juvenile dermatomyositis

OBJECTIVE

Few controlled studies are available to guide treatment decisions in juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM). This study evaluated therapies received, changes of treatment over time, and factors associated with medication choices in JDM.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of the number and type of therapies and duration of treatment for 320 patients with JDM enrolled in a North American registry. Kaplan-Meier and logistic regression analysis were used to assess the association of demographic and clinical features and autoantibodies with medication usage.

RESULTS

High-dose oral prednisone was the primary therapy given to 99% of patients. 1997 was determined to be a threshold year for increasing usage of medications other than prednisone. The median time to half the initial oral prednisone dose was shorter in patients diagnosed after vs. before 1997 (10 vs. 19 months, P < 0.01). Patients received intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP), methotrexate, intravenous immunoglobulin, antimalarial drugs, and combination therapy more frequently when diagnosed after 1997. IVMP was frequently received by patients with severe illness onset, anti-p155/140 (anti-TIF1) and anti-MJ (anti-NXP2) autoantibodies. Treatment with methotrexate was associated with older age at diagnosis and anti-MJ autoantibodies, while antimalarial therapy was associated with anti-p155/140 autoantibodies and mild onset severity.

CONCLUSION

Oral prednisone has been the mainstay of therapy in JDM, and prednisone was reduced faster in patients diagnosed after 1997 when there was also an increase in other medications. Specific medications received by patients with JDM correlated with year and age at diagnosis, myositis autoantibodies, onset severity, and illness features.