1
|
Rimmler C, Lanckohr C, Mittrup M, Welp H, Würthwein G, Horn D, Fobker M, Ellger B, Hempel G. Population pharmacokinetic evaluation of cefuroxime in perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis during and after cardiopulmonary bypass. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2020; 87:1486-1498. [PMID: 32959896 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Revised: 08/30/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS The purpose of this study was to explore pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic aspects of a contemporary dosing scheme of cefuroxime as perioperative prophylaxis in cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). METHODS Cefuroxime plasma concentrations were measured in 23 patients. A 1.5-g dose of cefuroxime was administered at start of surgery and CPB, followed by 3 additional doses every 6 hours postoperative. Drug levels were used to build a population pharmacokinetic model. Target attainment for Staphylococcus aureus (2-8 mg/L) and Escherichia coli (8-32 mg/L) were evaluated and dosing strategies for optimization were investigated. RESULTS A dosing scheme of 1.5 g cefuroxime preoperatively with a repetition at start of CPB achieves plasma unbound concentrations of 8 mg/L in almost all patients during surgery. The second administration is critical to provide this level of coverage. Simulations indicate that higher unbound concentrations up to 32 mg/L are reached by a continuous infusion rate of 1 g/h after a bolus of 1 g. In the postoperative phase, most patients do not reach unbound concentrations above 2 mg/L. To improve target attainment up to 8 mg/L, the continuous application of cefuroxime with infusion rates of 0.125-0.25 g/h is simulated and shown to be an alternative to bolus dosing. CONCLUSION Dosing recommendations for cefuroxime as perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac surgery are sufficient to reach plasma unbound concentration to cover S. aureus during the operation. Target attainment is not achieved in the postoperative period. Continuous infusion of cefuroxime may optimize target attainment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christer Rimmler
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Medical Chemistry-Clinical Pharmacy, Muenster, Germany
| | - Christian Lanckohr
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Miriam Mittrup
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Henryk Welp
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Gudrun Würthwein
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Medical Chemistry-Clinical Pharmacy, Muenster, Germany
| | - Dagmar Horn
- Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Manfred Fobker
- Center for Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Björn Ellger
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Klinikum Westfalen, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Georg Hempel
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Medical Chemistry-Clinical Pharmacy, Muenster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Courlet P, Guidi M, Glatard A, Alves Saldanha S, Cavassini M, Buclin T, Marzolini C, Eap CB, Decosterd LA, Csajka C. Escitalopram population pharmacokinetics in people living with human immunodeficiency virus and in the psychiatric population: Drug-drug interactions and probability of target attainment. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2019; 85:2022-2032. [PMID: 31144347 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2019] [Revised: 05/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/19/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS The aims of this study were to characterize escitalopram pharmacokinetic profile, to identify factors influencing drug exposure, notably drug-drug interactions with antiretrovirals, and to simulate expected exposure under standard dosage regimen. METHODS A population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using NONMEM. A total of 159 plasma concentration measurements were obtained from 39 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected and 71 uninfected psychiatric patients. The influence of age, weight, sex, HIV and psychiatric cohorts, racemic citalopram treatment, and comedications on oral clearance was examined. Simulations served to calculate the percentage of patients expected to be under- or over-exposed, considering established therapeutic targets (15-80 ng/mL). RESULTS A 1-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination described the data adequately. The average escitalopram clearance and volume of distribution were 23.1 L/h (interindividual variability 51%), and 920 L, respectively. Escitalopram disposition did not differ between HIV-infected and uninfected patients, and was not affected by antiretroviral treatments. Coadministration of at least 1 proton-pump inhibitor (CYP2C19 inhibitor) modestly influenced escitalopram elimination (clearance decreased by 19%), with limited clinical relevance. Model-based simulations showed that, under a standard regimen of 10 mg once daily, a significant proportion of patients (56%) might be under-exposed. CONCLUSION The variability in escitalopram disposition is large and poorly explained by demographic, clinical and environmental covariates, thus suggesting a role for dosage individualization based on therapeutic drug monitoring in case of poor clinical response. Escitalopram disposition is modestly impacted by comedications and therefore no a priori dosage adjustments are needed in patients receiving antiretroviral treatments, including boosted regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Perrine Courlet
- Service of Clinical Pharmacology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Monia Guidi
- Service of Clinical Pharmacology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.,School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Anaïs Glatard
- Service of Clinical Pharmacology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Unit of Pharmacogenetics and Clinical Psychopharmacology, Centre for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, Hospital of Cery, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Prilly, Switzerland
| | - Susana Alves Saldanha
- Service of Clinical Pharmacology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Cavassini
- Service of Infectious Diseases, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Thierry Buclin
- Service of Clinical Pharmacology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Catia Marzolini
- Departments of Medicine and Clinical Research, University Hospital of Basel and University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - Chin B Eap
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland.,Unit of Pharmacogenetics and Clinical Psychopharmacology, Centre for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, Hospital of Cery, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Prilly, Switzerland
| | - Laurent A Decosterd
- Service of Clinical Pharmacology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Chantal Csajka
- Service of Clinical Pharmacology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.,School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|