The Characterization of Violent Deaths Among Asian and Pacific Islander Americans

INTRODUCTION

Health disparities in the Asian and Pacific Islander Americans (APIAs) community have not been well described, unlike non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic communities. However, there has been a rise in violence against the APIA community. This study explores and characterizes violent death by incident (e.g., homicide, suicide), weapon (e.g., firearm, strangulation), and location types among APIAs as they compare with other racial or ethnic groups.

METHODS

We used the National Violent Death Reporting System from 2003 to 2018 to characterize violent deaths among APIA and compared them to all other races. We compared these racial categories in two ways. First, we compared all races as a categorical variable that included six non-Hispanic racial categories including "Other or unspecified" and "two or more races. We then created a binary variable of APIA versus All Other Races for analysis. We explored the incident type of death, substance abuse disorders, mental health history, and gang involvement among other variables. We used Chi-square tests for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U-tests for continuous variables.

RESULTS

Overall, APIAs had a unique pattern of violent death. APIAs were more likely to commit suicide (71.74%-62.21%, P<0.001) and less likely to die of homicide than other races (17.56%-24.31%, P<0.001). In the cases of homicide, APIAs were more likely to have their deaths precipitated by another crime (40.87% versus 27.87%, P < 0.001). APIAs were more than twice as likely to die of strangulation than other races (39.93%-18.06%, P<0.001). Conversely, APIAs were less likely to die by firearm than other races (29.69-51.51, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

APIAs have a unique pattern of violence based on analysis of data from the National Violent Death Reporting System. Our data reveal a significant difference in the incident, weapon and location type as compared to Americans of other races, which begs further inquiry into the patterns of change in time and factors that contribute to inter-racial differences in death patterns.

Suicide Among Persons Experiencing Homelessness

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to characterize suicide and associated disparities among persons experiencing homelessness (PEH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed suicide victims in the National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) from 2003 to 2018 and compared factors surrounding suicides of PEH to factors of housed victims. We also utilized the Point-in-Time (PIT) survey (2010-2018), and census population estimates, to estimate suicide rates among PEH and the wider population.

RESULTS

1.1% of suicide victims were described as experiencing homelessness at the time of their deaths, a value that is disproportional given the overall homeless rates of 0.2% in the past decade. Compared to nonhomeless victims, PEH were more likely to be younger, Black, male, and nonveterans. PEH were significantly more likely to have an identified alcohol/substance use disorder. PEH were half as likely to die via firearm and were more likely to die in natural areas, motels, and the streets. PEH were significantly more likely to have a history of suicidal thoughts, a history of suicide attempts, and a history of disclosure of intent, particularly to health care workers.

CONCLUSIONS

PEH are disproportionately overrepresented among all suicide victims, but the circumstances surrounding their deaths create opportunity for targeted interventions.

Medical Response and Factors Leading to Violent Death in the United States Incarcerated Population

BACKGROUND

This study aims to characterize trauma-associated deaths in the United States prison system. We hypothesize that incarcerated victims are less likely to receive appropriate medical care compared to the non-incarcerated.

METHODS

We utilized 2015-2017 National Violent Death Reporting System data. Victims were classified by whether they were seen by emergency medical services, in the emergency room, or hospitalized prior to death, with the latter considered higher levels of care. Propensity score matching was used to compare highest level of care received by incarcerated versus non-incarcerated victims with similar age, sex, race/ethnicity, weapon type, and state where the incident occurred.

RESULTS

Of 101,054 victims, 1229 (1.2%) were incarcerated at the time of fatal injury; 64.4% died by suicide. For suicide, the proportion of minority victims was higher in the incarcerated compared to the non-incarcerated population, but the opposite was true of homicide. Firearms were more commonly used in the non-incarcerated population. After Propensity score matching, we found that incarcerated victims received higher levels of medical care following suicide (P < 0.001) while there was no difference for homicide (P = 0.28). However, when only victims injured in public settings were included, we found that incarcerated homicide victims were less likely to receive hospital-based medical care.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to our hypothesis, overall, incarcerated victims received similar levels of medical care as compared to non-incarcerated victims following lethal injury. However, this fails to account for the highly supervised setting of prisons. Our findings reinforce that violence prevention methods should be tailored to specific populations.