Non-binary gender, vulnerable populations and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: Data from the COVID-19 MEntal health inTernational for the general population (COMET-G) study

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought significant mental health challenges, particularly for vulnerable populations, including non-binary gender individuals. The COMET international study aimed to investigate specific risk factors for clinical depression or distress during the pandemic, also in these special populations.

METHODS

Chi-square tests were used for initial screening to select only those variables which would show an initial significance. Risk Ratios (RR) were calculated, and a Multiple Backward Stepwise Linear Regression Analysis (MBSLRA) was followed with those variables given significant results at screening and with the presence of distress or depression or the lack of both of them.

RESULTS

The most important risk factors for depression were female (RR = 1.59-5.49) and non-binary gender (RR = 1.56-7.41), unemployment (RR = 1.41-6.57), not working during lockdowns (RR = 1.43-5.79), bad general health (RR = 2.74-9.98), chronic somatic disorder (RR = 1.22-5.57), history of mental disorders (depression RR = 2.31-9.47; suicide attempt RR = 2.33-9.75; psychosis RR = 2.14-10.08; Bipolar disorder RR = 2.75-12.86), smoking status (RR = 1.15-5.31) and substance use (RR = 1.77-8.01). The risk factors for distress or depression that survived MBSLRA were younger age, being widowed, living alone, bad general health, being a carer, chronic somatic disorder, not working during lockdowns, being single, self-reported history of depression, bipolar disorder, self-harm, suicide attempts and of other mental disorders, smoking, alcohol, and substance use.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeted preventive interventions are crucial to safeguard the mental health of vulnerable groups, emphasizing the importance of diverse samples in future research.

LIMITATIONS

Online data collection may have resulted in the underrepresentation of certain population groups.

Bright Voice Quality and Fundamental Frequency Variation in Non-binary Speakers

OBJECTIVES

1) To investigate if vocal variation produced by assigned-female-at-birth (AFAB) non-binary people differed from vocal variation produced by cisgender (cis) participants. Cue values produced by non-binary participants were predicted to differ from those values produced by cisgender participants. 2) To determine if previous subjective assessments of bright voice quality in AFAB non-binary participants were quantifiable, and if so, if non-binary and cisgender participants differed in their voice quality production.

STUDY DESIGN

A quantitative comparative research design.

METHODS

Phonetic and statistical analyses of continuous speech samples produced by AFAB non-binary and cisgender participants. Vocal cues were mean fundamental frequency (F0) and bright voice quality, measured by cepstral peak prominence-smoothed and spectral slope, with speaker gender as the predictor.

RESULTS

At the group level, non-binary participants produced intermediate F0 values - significantly lower than the cis women's and significantly higher than the cis men's. Individually, the majority of non-binary participants produced mean F0 in this intermediate range. Non-binary participants produced significantly less negative spectral slope and higher cepstral peak prominence-smoothed, indicative of a brighter, more resonant voice quality. Individual-level results indicated that vocal training and vocal tract physiology did not fully account for the results found.

CONCLUSION

Participants' agency, particularly their motivation to alter vocal output to avoid being misgendered, has an effect on the AFAB non-binary participants' F0 production and potentially their voice quality. The majority of AFAB non-binary participants uniquely produced the cue combination of intermediate F0 and bright voice quality.

Fertility preservation decision making amongst Australian transgender and non-binary adults

Background

Historically, transitioning gender was seen as precluding transgender people from having children in the future. However, there are now increased reproductive options available to transgender people, with such options also available to non-binary people (i.e., people whose gender is not exclusively male or female). These options include undertaking fertility preservation if genetic children may be desired in the future. Despite these increased options, there is still only a limited amount of international research exploring the views of transgender and non-binary people on fertility preservation.

Methods

This mixed-methods study draws on a convenience sample of Australian transgender and non-binary adults, focused on their decision making about fertility preservation. The questionnaire was constructed by the authors, drawing on previous research. Participants were recruited via Australian organisations and groups made up of and/or working with people who are transgender or non-binary. The questionnaire was open from January–February 2018. The final sample included 409 participants. Statistical analyses were conducted on the closed-ended responses. Open-ended responses were analysed via a conventional content analysis.

Results

Decisions about fertility preservation were influenced by views on the importance of genetic relatedness, willingness to delay transition, economic resources, already having children or desiring children in the future, and the views of significant others. Advice or counselling prior to decision making was received only by a minority of participants. Very few participants (7%) had undertaken fertility preservation, although 95% said that fertility preservation should be offered to all transgender and non-binary people. Participants who viewed genetic relatedness as important were more likely to have undertaken fertility preservation.

Conclusions

The findings indicate that fertility preservation should be made available as an option to all transgender or non-binary people prior to undertaking treatment which may impact on fertility. However, it should also be recognised that not all people who are transgender or non-binary will want to undertake fertility preservation, and that not all people may be able to afford to.