Delayed umbilical cord clamping in elective and nonelective term Cesarean delivery

BACKGROUND

Delayed cord clamping (DCC) is recommended for preterm and term neonates, regardless of delivery mode. After impression of increased maternal blood loss following DCC implementation during Cesarean delivery (CD) concerns arose about maternal safety, particularly in term CDs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study by reviewing birth records from our tertiary hospital in Kuopio, Finland including 914 women with singleton term CD and recorded estimated blood loss. Early cord clamping (ECC) occurred from January 2016 to December 2019, while DCC (30-60 s) from January 2020 to December 2020. We evaluated maternal and neonatal outcomes for ECC vs. DCC and assessed severe postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) (≥1500 ml) and its potential clinical risk factors.

RESULTS

In total, 914 women were included (DCC N = 152; ECC N = 762). Estimated mean maternal blood loss showed no significant difference between DCC and ECC groups (697 ml vs. 750 ml, p < 0.96). Severe PPH was less frequent in the DCC group (4.6% vs. 10.5 %, p < 0.024). Neonatal outcomes were similar between groups. Multivariable analysis revealed that women with placenta previa (OR 5.63, p < 0.001), macrosomic neonate (OR 2.75, p < 0.001), and intrapartum infection (OR 2.00, p < 0.057) had an increased risk for severe PPH. Earlier CD was associated with less severe PPH (OR 0.36, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

DCC (30-60 s) during term CD did not increase maternal blood loss in singleton pregnancies and demonstrated no short-term adverse effects on neonates. Our findings support the general practice of DCC during both elective and nonelective term CD.

A nationwide assessment comparing nonelective open with minimally invasive complex colorectal procedures

AIM

The use of minimally invasive colorectal surgery has increased greatly for both benign and malignant disease. Studies evaluating complex procedures have been largely limited to elective indications. We aimed to compare the outcome of a laparoscopic with an open transverse (TC) and total abdominal colectomy (TAC) in the nonelective setting.

METHOD

Comparative analysis was made using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2008-11) of patients undergoing a nonelective TC or TAC identified by ICD-9-CM procedure codes. The risk-adjusted 30-day outcome was assessed using regression modelling accounting for patient characteristics, comorbidity and surgical procedure.

RESULTS

We identified 7261 admissions including 818 laparoscopic and 6443 open procedures. The mean age of the population was 65 ± 17 years and patients in the laparoscopic group were younger (56 ± 20 vs. 66 ± 17 years; P < 0.05). The rate of a single complication was lower in the laparoscopic group (26% vs. 38%; P < 0.01), but this did not remain significant following a logistic regression analysis. Mortality was significantly lower in the laparoscopic group (3.1% vs. 17%; P < 0.01) and this remained true after adjusting for covariates (OR = 0.62; P < 0.05). Laparoscopic cases were associated with a shorter median length of stay (10 vs. 13 days; P < 0.01) and hospital charge ($75,758 vs. $98,833; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

A nonelective laparoscopic TC or TAC is associated with an equivalent complication rate and lower mortality compared with an open operation. The results should encourage surgeons with the appropriate skills to consider a laparoscopic approach for nonelective pathology requiring a complex colectomy.

Inpatient outcomes after elective versus nonelective ventral hernia repair

BACKGROUND

Patients who present emergently with hernia-related concerns may experience increased morbidity with repair when compared with those repaired electively. We sought to characterize the outcomes of patients who undergo elective and nonelective ventral hernia (VH) repair using a large population-based data set.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried for primary International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes associated with VH repair (years 2008-2011). Outcomes were inhospital mortality and the occurrence of a preidentified complication. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine the risk factors for complications and mortality after both elective and nonelective VH repair.

RESULTS

We identified 74,151 VH repairs performed during the study interval. Of these procedures, 67.3% were elective and 21.6% were performed laparoscopically. Nonelective repair was associated with a significantly higher rate of morbidity (22.5% versus 18.8%, P < 0.01) and mortality (1.8% versus 0.52, P < 0.01) than elective repair. Elective repairs were more likely to occur in younger patients, Caucasians, and were more likely to be performed laparoscopically. Logistic modeling revealed that female gender, Caucasian race, elective case status, and laparoscopic approach were independently associated with a lower probability of complications and mortality. Minority status and Medicaid payer status were associated with increased probability of nonelective admission.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing elective VH repair in the United States tend to be younger, Caucasian, and more likely to have a laparoscopic repair. Nonelective VH is associated with a substantial increase in morbidity and mortality. We recommend that patients consider elective repair of VHs because of the increased morbidity and mortality associated with nonelective repair.