[Excisional surgery of orbital tumors]

The indications for orbital tumor surgery are an incisional biopsy to confirm the diagnosis or in malignant operable tumors a complete excision or a debulking to avoid complications in large invasively infiltrating tumors. In the case of benign tumors, the indications for surgery depend mostly on the clinical symptoms and cosmetic esthetic disfigurement. In the present article the preoperative examinations as well as surgical access approaches to different orbital regions, endoscopic procedures and methods of intraoperative navigation are presented. Magnetic resonance imaging is the instrument of choice, whereby in many cases computed tomography (CT) adds further information. Depending on the indications, diffusion-weighted sequences, CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography (DSA, catheter angiography) are added to the preoperative diagnostics. For space-occupying lesions located anterior to the bulbar equator, an anterior orbitotomy can be performed transconjunctivally or transpalpebrally. A lateral orbitotomy is used to reach lateral, laterocranial, and lateroinferior orbital segments, whereas transcranial approaches are suitable for processes located far posterior and for those with retro-orbital intracranial extension as well as for processes in the optic foramen/superior orbital fissure. The indications for an endonasal access approach are processes medial to the bulb or optic nerve and up to the orbital apex. A transantral access can be chosen for caudal, mediolateral, and medioinferior space-occupying lesions. Modern orbital surgery is complemented by endoscopic procedures and intraoperative navigation. Orbital tumors belong to the interdisciplinary relevant diseases. Therefore, an optimal management takes place at specialized multidisciplinary centers.

Computerized Tomography-Guided Core-Needle Biopsy of Orbital Space-Occupying Lesions: A Case Series

Purpose

To describe our experience in performing biopsy of post-septal orbital masses with core needle under computerized tomography guidance (CT-CNB).

Methods

The medical records of all patients who underwent this procedure were reviewed. The procedure was performed under local anesthesia on a day case basis under a peribulbar block. A planning non-contrast computerized tomography (CT) scan of the orbits was performed to localise the mass. A 6-cm 18-G Temno Evolution® semi-automated biopsy needle was inserted through the skin into the orbit. Prior to further advancement of the needle, a low-dose CT limited to the previously determined plane was performed to confirm its position. The needle was then advanced, and the cutting needle was deployed to obtain the biopsy.

Results

Five patients who underwent CT-CNB were identified. The CNB was successful in 4 patients and revealed a metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, a metastatic neuroendocrine tumour, and orbital inflammatory disease. The biopsy failed in the fifth patient when the needle failed to penetrate the tumour despite good localisation on CT. He was eventually diagnosed with fibrous meningioma of the greater wing of sphenoid on open biopsy. None of the patients had any complications other than peri-ocular bruising which was present in all of them.

Conclusion

CT-CNB of mass lesions located in the lateral aspect of the orbit can be an alternative to open biopsy in selected cases. It avoids major surgery and allows the use of radiotherapy, if required, without any delay.

Lateral rectus muscle biopsy as diagnosis of unknown metastatic breast cancer

The case concerns a 58 year-old female with no medical history of interest who consulted due to binocular diplopia of one week onset. It was associated with costal pain, dyspnoea, intense asthenia and weight loss of 2 months onset. In the blood analysis in the Emergency Department it showed hypercalcaemia, renal failure, and bicytopenia. The chest x-ray showed lytic bone lesions that initially lead to multiple myeloma with extra-osseous involvement. In addition to the corresponding study, in case of horizontal diplopia, a cranial CT scan without contrast was performed where an adjacent lesion to the lateral wall of the left orbit is observed. This was of soft tissue density, and included the external rectus muscle that exerts a mass effect on the optic nerve by displacing it medially. Many lytic bone diffuse lesions with salt and pepper pattern were found in the calotte. A rectus lateral muscle and bone biopsy of the sacral wing was performed, resulting in metastasis of carcinoma compatible with mammary origin. An atypical case is presented of horizontal diplopia in the context of a patient with a severe constitutional picture with no established diagnosis, in which the biopsy of the lateral rectum was key to the confirmation diagnosis.

Orbital Metastases: When to Suspect? When to biopsy?

Incidental orbital masses that are asymptomatic and appear benign are often observed without surgical intervention unless there is a clinical or radiographic change in the mass. There is a burgeoning population of cancer patients with incidental masses that have been detected while under surveillance for metastasis. This population of patients is growing due to a number of reasons, including more extensive imaging, an aging population, and more effective cancer treatments. Closer scrutiny should be applied to these patients, due to the possibility of the mass being an orbital metastasis. In addition, the approach to these patients may have implications regarding the adult patient without a cancer history who presents with a symptomatic orbital mass. The purpose of this paper is to explore the approach to the patient with and without a cancer history who presents with an orbital mass.

[Rationale for a diagnostic approach in non-Graves' orbital inflammation--Report of 61 patients]

INTRODUCTION

Orbital inflammatory syndromes include a wide variety of inflammatory intraorbital processes which are very different in terms of clinical presentation and prognosis. We currently prefer to differentiate so-called "specific" inflammations, for which an etiology is able to be identified, from idiopathic orbital inflammatory syndromes (IOIS), for which the etiology remains unknown and the histology is nonspecific.

PURPOSE

To propose an efficient diagnostic approach for clinicians managing patients with non-Graves' orbital inflammations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective and prospective study concerning 61 patients managed by the medical team for non-Graves' orbital inflammations between May, 1999 and May, 2013 in the ophthalmology departments of Nice and Limoges university hospitals in France. Seventeen specific inflammations, 19 orbital lymphomas and 25 idiopathic orbital inflammatory syndromes were included. Patients were divided into two groups. Thirty-six patients (group 1) underwent primary biopsy, while for the other 25 (group 2), therapy was begun empirically without biopsy. We could therefore compare both approaches in terms of diagnostic efficiency and time until identification of a specific etiology.

RESULTS

Our statistical results show that an approach without primary biopsy leads to a number of specific diagnoses statistically much lower than that obtained by the approach with primary biopsy. Also, the risk of missing a specific inflammation (with as a consequence an inappropriate treatment and a risk of functional sequelae as well as a fatal risk of missing a lymphoproliferative pathology) is very clearly higher in the case of not performing primary biopsy. Finally, the average time elapsed between the initial consultation with the ophthalmologist and a specific diagnosis was one month in the case of the first approach, while this delay was almost three times higher with the second approach, with a mean of 2.91 months (P<0.01).

DISCUSSION

Our study shows that biopsy should be the mainstay of diagnostic management. A trial of empiric treatment is only performed first in myositis or in locations where biopsy could jeopardize functional prognosis. It should only be done after biopsy in all other cases. Of course, in all cases of relapse or recurrence after treatment, biopsy should be performed or repeated.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic work-up of a patient with an orbital inflammatory process must of course include blood testing and orbital imaging, but also a systematic primary biopsy for histological examination in the vast majority of cases. It must be repeated at least in the case of any doubt about the diagnosis or in the case of any recurrence or resistance to treatment.