White matter tract conductivity is resistant to wide variations in paranodal structure and myelin thickness accompanying the loss of Tyro3: an experimental and simulated analysis

Myelination within the central nervous system (CNS) is crucial for the conduction of action potentials by neurons. Variation in compact myelin morphology and the structure of the paranode are hypothesised to have significant impact on the speed of action potentials. There are, however, limited experimental data investigating the impact of changes in myelin structure upon conductivity in the central nervous system. We have used a genetic model in which myelin thickness is reduced to investigate the effect of myelin alterations upon action potential velocity. A detailed examination of the myelin ultrastructure of mice in which the receptor tyrosine kinase Tyro3 has been deleted showed that, in addition to thinner myelin, these mice have significantly disrupted paranodes. Despite these alterations to myelin and paranodal structure, we did not identify a reduction in conductivity in either the corpus callosum or the optic nerve. Exploration of these results using a mathematical model of neuronal conductivity predicts that the absence of Tyro3 would lead to reduced conductivity in single fibres, but would not affect the compound action potential of multiple myelinated neurons as seen in neuronal tracts. Our data highlight the importance of experimental assessment of conductivity and suggests that simple assessment of structural changes to myelin is a poor predictor of neural functional outcomes.

Pathophysiology of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy: Insights into Classification and Therapeutic Strategy

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is classically defined as polyneuropathy with symmetric involvement of the proximal and distal portions of the limbs. In addition to this "typical CIDP", the currently prevailing diagnostic criteria proposed by the European Federation of Neurological Societies and Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) define "atypical CIDP" as encompassing the multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor (MADSAM), distal acquired demyelinating symmetric (DADS), pure sensory, pure motor, and focal subtypes. Although macrophage-induced demyelination is considered pivotal to the pathogenesis of CIDP, recent studies have indicated the presence of distinctive mechanisms initiated by autoantibodies against paranodal junction proteins, such as neurofascin 155 and contactin 1. These findings led to the emergence of the concept of nodopathy or paranodopathy. Patients with these antibodies tend to show clinical features compatible with typical CIDP or DADS, particularly the latter. In contrast, classical macrophage-induced demyelination is commonly found in some patients in each major subtype, including the typical CIDP, DADS, MADSAM, and pure sensory subtypes. Differences in the distribution of lesions and the repair processes underlying demyelination by Schwann cells may determine the differences among subtypes. In particular, the preferential involvement of proximal and distal nerve segments has been suggested to occur in typical CIDP, whereas the involvement of the middle nerve segments is conspicuous in MADSAM. These findings suggest that humoral rather than cellular immunity predominates in the former because nerve roots and neuromuscular junctions lack blood-nerve barriers. Treatment for CIDP consists of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy, steroids, and plasma exchange, either alone or in combination. However, patients with anti-neurofascin 155 and contactin 1 antibodies are refractory to IVIg. It has been suggested that rituximab, a monoclonal antibody to CD20, could have efficacy in these patients. Further studies are needed to validate the CIDP subtypes defined by the EFNS/PNS from the viewpoint of pathogenesis and establish therapeutic strategies based on the pathophysiologies specific to each subtype.

Ultrastructural Lesions of Nodo-Paranodopathies in Peripheral Neuropathies

Whatever the cause of myelin damage of the peripheral nervous system, the initial attack on myelin by a dysimmune process may begin either at the internodal area or in the paranodal and nodal regions. The term "nodo-paranodopathy" was first applied to some "axonal Guillain-Barré syndrome" subtypes, then extended to cases classified as chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy bearing IgG4 antibodies against paranodal axoglial proteins. In these cases, paranodal dissection develops in the absence of macrophage-induced demyelination. In contrast, the mechanisms of demyelination of other dysimmune neuropathies induced by macrophages are unexplained, as no antibodies have been identified in such cases. Electron microscopy of longitudinal sections of nerve biopsies is useful to visualize and authenticate the characteristic lesions of paranodes/nodes. However, it should be borne in mind that identical ultrastructural aspects are seen in other types of polyneuropathies: Genetic, experimental, and in a few polyneuropathies for which there is no obvious etiology. Ultrastructural nerve studies confirm the initial involvement of nodes/paranodes in various types of acquired and genetic neuropathies. For some of them, the antibodies or the proteins involved by mutations are clearly identified such as Caspr-1, Contactin-1, NFasc155, and NFasc186; other unidentified proteins are likely to be involved as well.

Functional Domains in Myelinated Axons

Propagation of action potentials along axons is optimized through interactions between neurons and myelinating glial cells. Myelination drives division of the axons into distinct molecular domains including nodes of Ranvier. The high density of voltage-gated sodium channels at nodes generates action potentials allowing for rapid and efficient saltatory nerve conduction. At paranodes flanking both sides of the nodes, myelinating glial cells interact with axons, forming junctions that are essential for node formation and maintenance. Recent studies indicate that the disruption of these specialized axonal domains is involved in the pathophysiology of various neurological diseases. Loss of paranodal axoglial junctions due to genetic mutations or autoimmune attack against the paranodal proteins leads to nerve conduction failure and neurological symptoms. Breakdown of nodal and paranodal proteins by calpains, the calcium-dependent cysteine proteases, may be a common mechanism involved in various nervous system diseases and injuries. This chapter reviews recent progress in neurobiology and pathophysiology of specialized axonal domains along myelinated nerve fibers.

Anti-neurofascin autoantibody and demyelination

Demyelination diseases involving the central and peripheral nervous systems are etiologically heterogeneous with both cell-mediated and humoral immunities playing pathogenic roles. Recently, autoantibodies against nodal and paranodal proteins, such as neurofascin186 (NF186), neurofascin155 (NF155), contactin-1 (CNTN1), contactin-associated protein 1 (CASPR1) and gliomedin, have been discovered in not only chronic demyelinating conditions, such as multiple sclerosis (MS) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, but also in acute demyelinating conditions, such as Guillain-Barré syndrome. Only a minority of these patients harbor anti-nodal/paranodal protein antibodies; however, these autoantibodies, especially IgG4 subclass autoantibodies to paranodal proteins, are associated with unique features and these conditions are collectively termed nodopathy or paranodopathy. Establishing a concept of IgG4-related nodopathy/paranodopathy contributes to diagnosis and treatment strategy because IgG4 autoantibody-related neurological diseases are often refractory to conventional immunotherapies. IgG4 does not fix complements, or internalize the target antigens, because IgG4 exists in a monovalent bispecific form in vivo. IgG4 autoantibodies can bock protein-protein interaction. Thus, the primary role of IgG4 anti-paranodal protein antibodies may be blockade of interactions between NF155 and CNTN1/CASPR1, leading to conduction failure, which is consistent with the sural nerve pathology presenting paranodal terminal loop detachment from axons with intact internodes in the absence of inflammation. However, it still remains to be elucidated how these autoantibodies belonging to the same IgG4 subclass can cause each IgG4 autoantibody-specific manifestation. Another important issue is to clarify the mechanism by which IgG4 antibodies to nodal/paranodal proteins emerge. IgG4 antibodies develop on chronic antigenic stimulation and can block antibodies that alleviate allergic inflammation by interfering with the binding of allergen-specific IgE to allergens. Thus, environmental antigens cross-reacting with nodal and paranodal proteins may warrant future study.

Parallel fluctuation of anti-neurofascin 155 antibody levels with clinico-electrophysiological findings in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

BACKGROUND

The long-term clinical course and closely related biomarkers in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) with anti-neurofascin 155 (NF155) antibodies remain to be elucidated.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied the longitudinal clinical courses of three Japanese male anti-NF155 antibody-positive CIDP patients. Anti-NF155 antibody levels were measured by flow cytometry using HEK293 cell lines stably expressing human NF155.

RESULTS

All three patients presented with chronic progressive sensorimotor disturbance, with ages at onset of 16, 26, and 34years old, and they were followed for 58, 31, and 38months, respectively, from the onset. All patients had postural tremor and generalized decreased deep tendon reflexes. Peak cerebrospinal fluid protein levels were >400mg/dl, and nerve conduction studies (NCS) showed severe demyelination patterns. Combined immunotherapies including intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange, corticosteroids, and other immunosuppressants ameliorated clinical severity and NCS abnormalities, with improvements of >10kg in grip strength and at least 20% in F-wave latencies. However, their symptoms exacerbated after the immunotherapies were tapered. Anti-NF155 antibody levels varied in parallel with the clinical and electrophysiological changes, or preceded them.

CONCLUSION

The patients' clinical courses suggest that anti-NF155 antibody levels and NCS findings could be disease activity markers in anti-NF155 antibody-positive CIDP.

Disrupted axon-glia interactions at the paranode in myelinated nerves cause axonal degeneration and neuronal cell death in the aged Caspr mutant mouse shambling

Emerging evidence suggests that axonal degeneration is a disease mechanism in various neurodegenerative diseases and that the paranodes at the nodes of Ranvier may be the initial site of pathogenesis. We investigated the pathophysiology of the disease process in the central and peripheral nervous systems of a Caspr mutant mouse, shambling (shm), which is affected by disrupted paranodal structures and impaired nerve conduction of myelinated nerves. The shm mice manifest a progressive neurological phenotype as mice age. We found extensive axonal degeneration and a loss of neurons in the central nervous system and peripheral nervous system in aged shm mice. Axonal alteration of myelinated nerves was defined by abnormal distribution and expression of neurofilaments and derangements in the status of phosphorylated and non/de-phosphorylated neurofilaments. Autophagy-related structures were also accumulated in degenerated axons and neurons. In conclusion, our results suggest that disrupted axon-glia interactions at the paranode cause the cytoskeletal alteration in myelinated axons leading to neuronal cell death, and the process involves detrimental autophagy and aging as factors that promote the pathogenesis.

Submembranous cytoskeletons stabilize nodes of Ranvier

Rapid action potential propagation along myelinated axons requires voltage-gated Na(+) (Nav) channel clustering at nodes of Ranvier. At paranodes flanking nodes, myelinating glial cells interact with axons to form junctions. The regions next to the paranodes called juxtaparanodes are characterized by high concentrations of voltage-gated K(+) channels. Paranodal axoglial junctions function as barriers to restrict the position of these ion channels. These specialized domains along the myelinated nerve fiber are formed by multiple molecular mechanisms including interactions between extracellular matrix, cell adhesion molecules, and cytoskeletal scaffolds. This review highlights recent findings into the roles of submembranous cytoskeletal proteins in the stabilization of molecular complexes at and near nodes. Axonal ankyrin-spectrin complexes stabilize Nav channels at nodes. Axonal protein 4.1B-spectrin complexes contribute to paranode and juxtaparanode organization. Glial ankyrins enriched at paranodes facilitate node formation. Finally, disruption of spectrins or ankyrins by genetic mutations or proteolysis is involved in the pathophysiology of various neurological or psychiatric disorders.

Molecular regulators of nerve conduction - Lessons from inherited neuropathies and rodent genetic models

Myelinated nerve fibers are highly compartmentalized. Helically wrapped lipoprotein membranes of myelin are integrated with subsets of proteins specifically in each compartment to shape the physiological behavior of these nerve fibers. With the advance of molecular biology and genetics, many functions of these proteins have been revealed over the past decade. In this review, we will first discuss how action potential propagation has been understood by classical electrophysiological studies. In particular, the discussion will be concentrated on how the geometric dimensions of myelinated nerve fibers (such as internodal length and myelin thickness) may affect nerve conduction velocity. This discussion will then extend into how specific myelin proteins may shape these geometric parameters, thereby regulating action potential propagation. For instance, periaxin may specifically affect the internodal length, but not other parameters. In contrast, neuregulin-1 may affect myelin thickness, but not axon diameter or internodal length. Finally, we will discuss how these basic neurobiological observations can be applied to inherited peripheral nerve diseases.