Importance of passive muscle, skin, and adipose tissue mechanical properties on head and neck response in rear impacts assessed with a finite element model

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to improve head-neck kinematic predictions of a contemporary finite element (FE) head-neck model, assessed in rear impact scenarios (3-10 g), by including an accurate representation of the skin, adipose tissue, and passive muscle mechanical properties. The soft tissues of the neck have a substantial contribution to kinematic response, with the contribution being inversely proportional to the impact severity. Thus accurate representation of these passive tissues is critical for the assessment of kinematic response and the potential for crash induced injuries. Contemporary Human Body Models (HBMs) often incorporate overly stiff mechanical properties of passive tissues for numerical stability, which can affect the predicted kinematic response of the head and neck.

METHODS

Soft tissue material properties including non-linearity, compression-tension asymmetry, and viscoelasticity were implemented in constitutive models for the skin, adipose, and passive muscle tissues, based on experimental data in the literature. A quasi-linear viscoelastic formulation was proposed for the skin, while a phenomenological hyper-viscoelastic model was used for the passive muscle and adipose tissues. A head-neck model extracted from a contemporary FE HBM was updated to include the new tissue models and assessed using head rotation angle for rear impact scenarios (3 g, 7 g, and 10 g peak accelerations), and compared to postmortem human surrogate (PMHS) data for 7 g impacts.

RESULTS

The head rotation angle increased with the new material models for all three rear impact cases: (3 g: +43%, 7 g: +52%, 10 g: +71%), relative to the original model. The increase in head rotation was primarily attributed to the improved skin model, with the passive muscle being a secondary contributor to the increase in response. A 52% increase in head rotation for the 7 g impact improved the model response with respect to PMHS data, placing it closer to the experimental average, compared to the original model.

CONCLUSIONS

The improved skin, adipose tissue, and passive muscle material model properties, based on published experimental data, increased the neck compliance in rear impact, with improved correspondence to published PMHS test data for medium severity impacts. Future studies will investigate the coupled effect of passive and active muscle tissue for low severity impacts.

Investigation of the passive mechanical properties of spine muscles following disruption of the thoracolumbar fascia and erector spinae aponeurosis, as well as facet injury in a rat

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Muscle tissue is known to remodel in response to changes to its mechanical environment. Alterations in passive mechanical properties of muscles can influence spine stiffness and stability.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine whether passive muscle elastic moduli and passive muscle stresses increased 28 days following mechanical disruption of the thoracolumbar fascia and erector spinae aponeurosis, and injury induced by facet joint compression.

STUDY DESIGN

Male Sprague Dawley rats were randomly assigned to three groups (Incision n=8; Injury n=8; and Control n=6).

METHODS

The thoracolumbar fascia and erector spinae aponeurosis were incised in the Incision and Injury groups to expose the left L5-L6 facet joint. In the Injury group, this facet was additionally compressed for three minutes to induce facet injury and cartilage degeneration. Twenty-eight days after surgery, rats were sacrificed and muscle samples were harvested from lumbar and thoracic erector spinae and multifidus for mechanical testing.

RESULTS

Histologic staining revealed mild cartilage degeneration and boney remodeling in the Injury group. However, the hypotheses that either (1) disruption of the thoracolumbar fascia and erector spinae aponeurosis (Incision group) or (2) the addition of facet compression (Injury group) would increase the passive elastic modulus and stress of surrounding muscles were rejected. There was no effect of surgery (Incision or Injury) on the passive elastic modulus (p=.6597). Passive muscle stresses were also not different at any sarcomere length between surgical groups (p>.7043).

CONCLUSION

Disruption of the thoracolumbar fascia and erector spinae aponeurosis and mild facet damage do not lead to measurable changes in passive muscle mechanical properties within 28 days. These findings contribute to our understanding of how spine muscles are affected by injury and fundamental aspects of the initial stages of spine surgery.