The Role of Pecking Motion Depths in Dynamic Cyclic Fatigue Resistance: In Vitro Study

OBJECTIVE

This is the first study evaluating the impact of different pecking motion depths on dynamic cyclic fatigue resistance of different endodontic instruments.

METHODS

Four nickel-titanium systems (Hyflex EDM OneFile 25/. ∼; Rotate 25/0.6; Mtwo 25/0.6; Reciproc Blue R25) were tested. Forty instruments from each group were subjected to 4 different pecking movements to evaluate their cyclic fatigue resistance. The distances for the pecking motion were 3-mm forward and backward, 1-mm (3-mm forward and 2-mm backward), 2-mm (4-mm forward and 2-mm backward), and 3-mm (5-mm forward and 2-mm backward). Speeds were 100 and 200 mm/min for the descending and ascending motion, respectively. The times to fracture (TtF) in seconds were recorded for each instrument. Data were statistically analysed by using 2-way ANOVA and Bonferroni multiple comparison post hoc test (P < .05).

RESULTS

All instruments had a significant increase in cyclic fatigue resistance during the forward dynamic motion compared with the axial continuous. Overall, the heat-treated instruments reported higher fatigue strength than the untreated files (P < .05). Reciproc Blue and Hyflex EDM showed higher TtF in the forward movements of 1-/2-mm and 2-mm (P < .05), respectively while Mtwo 25.06 and Rotate 25.06 in the forward movement of 3-mm (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limits of this in vitro study, the pecking motion depths had varying impacts on the cyclic fatigue resistance of instruments. Reciproc Blue and Hyflex EDM performed significantly better with pecking motions of 1-and 2-mm. Improving endodontic instrument durability through specific pecking depths has the potential for improving clinical performance and reducing instrument failures.