Usami Y, Nakamura K, Mizobuchi Y, Mizuki K, Harusawa S, Yoneyama H, Yamada T. Enantiomeric composition of natural pericosine A derived from
Periconia byssoides and α-glycosidase inhibitory activity of (-)-enantiomer.
Chirality 2022;
34:1320-1327. [PMID:
35775430 DOI:
10.1002/chir.23491]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Revised: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Chiral high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis of natural pericosine A, which appeared in literature first in 1977, from Periconia byssoides was conducted using a column CHIRALPAK® AD-H to determine the enantiomeric composition of the original mixture which was found to be 68: 32 mixtures of (+)- and (-)-enantiomer, respectively. Furthermore, two independently isolated samples of pericosine A from the same fungus were also analyzed to show the two peaks in the HPLC charts at approximate 1:1 ratio. These results concluded that pericosine A derived from Periconia byssoides was indeed an enantiomeric mixture. Synthesized enantiomers were subjected to evaluation of antitumor activity against three kinds of tumor cells (p388, L1210, HL-60), indicating moderate cytotoxicity against all three kinds of tumor cell lines, but significant difference in potency between the enantiomers was not observed. In contrast, when both the enantiomers of pericosine A were evaluated against five kinds of glycosidases-inhibitory activities (α- and β-glucosidases, α- and β-galactosidases, and α-mannosidase), an apparent difference on anti-glycosidase assay was found between the enantiomers: (-)-pericosine A inhibited α-glucosidase at IC50 : 2.25 mM, and β-galactosidase at IC50 : 5.38 mM, albeit the (+)-enantiomer showed inactivity against these five enzymes.
Collapse