Medial gastrocnemius rotational flap for the reconstruction of extensor mechanism disruption in periprosthetic knee infections: a retrospective series with minimum two year follow-up

PURPOSE

Extensor mechanism disruption following total knee arthroplasty has a prevalence ranging from 0.3 to 3%. Its management is challenging, especially in case of associated infection of the prosthetic implant. Surgical options are limited due to the septic process, and the use of allograft or synthetic mesh are not recommended. The aim of this study was to report clinical outcomes, complications, survival, and surgical technique of medial gastrocnemius flap for the treatment of extensor mechanism disruptions associated with periprosthetic knee infection.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study from a prospectively collected arthroplasty registry from 2012 to 2019. Patients who received the gastrocnemius flap in the setting of a two-stage knee replacement for periprosthetic infection were included. Results of physical examination, Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score, and measurement of the range of motion registered pre-operatively were compared to those obtained at last follow-up. Survival was analysed through Kaplan-Meier curve.

RESULTS

A total of 15 patients were included, with a mean age of 63.4 years (range 36-77). The reconstruction of the extensor mechanism demonstrated a success rate of 73.3%. The mean extension lag at final follow-up was 7.5° (range, 0-30). The mean Knee Society Score and Oxford Knee Score improved from 29.0 (range, 21-36) and 17.5 (range, 13-22) respectively, to 82.9 (range, 74-89) and 36.0 (range, 33-39).

CONCLUSION

Medial gastrocnemius rotational flap is a reliable option for joint and limb salvage in case of periprosthetic knee infection associated with wide soft tissue degeneration and extensor mechanism disruption. The technique and surgical protocol presented in this study are reproducible and guaranteed good clinical outcomes and infection control.

Predictors of failure of two-stage revision in periprosthetic knee infection: a retrospective cohort study with a minimum two-year follow-up

PURPOSE

Despite the standardization of two-stage knee revision protocols, a high percentage of failures still occurs. Identifying the predictors of failure is necessary to determine appropriate management and counsel for patients with a periprosthetic knee infection. This study aimed to identify risk factors predicting the failure, to describe implant survival, and to report the mid-term clinical outcomes of patients undergoing two-stage revision for periprosthetic knee infection.

METHODS

Data of patients who underwent two-stage knee revision from 2012 to 2016 were analyzed, and 108 patients were included. The mean age was 66.6 ± 9.2 years. The mean follow-up was 52.9 ± 15.6 months. Logistic regression was conducted to identify predictors of treatment failure. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to assess implant survival. Preoperative functional outcomes were compared to those registered at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

Difficult-to-treat infections (OR = 4.2, 95% CI 1.2-14.5, p = 0.025), the number of previous surgeries (OR = 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.6, p = 0.005), and the level of tibial bone defect (OR = 2.3, 95% CI 1.1-4.7, p = 0.027) significantly predicted the failure of two-stage knee revision. Survivorship of implants was significantly lower for patients presenting these risk factors (p < 0.05). Mean Knee Society Score improved from 49.0 ± 12.0 to 80.2 ± 13.6 (p < 0.001). Mean Oxford Knee Score improved from 22.2 ± 4.9 to 36.1 ± 6.0 points (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Difficult-to-treat pathogens, the number of previous surgeries, and the level of tibial bone defect were independent risk factors of two-stage knee revision failure. Overall, the two-stage protocol provided a good survival rate and functional outcome.

Is short-course systemic antibiotic therapy using an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer safe after resection for infected total knee arthroplasty? A comparative study

BACKGROUD/PURPOSE

Most patients who undergo two-stage exchange arthroplasty surgery for total knee arthroplasty prosthetic joint infection (TKA-PJI) receive a six-week course of systemic antibiotic treatment after the first stage procedure. However, the optimal duration of therapy has not been conclusively determined.

METHODS

We included 64 patients with periprosthetic knee infection who had undergone two-stage exchange arthroplasty. Between March 2003 and December 2009, 21 patients were given a short-course (less than 1 week) antibiotic treatment, and 43 were given a standard-course (4-6 weeks) treatment during the interim period. We compared length of hospital stay, duration of intravenous and overall systemic antibiotic treatments, and rate of recurrent periprosthetic knee infection between groups.

RESULTS

Short-course antibiotic treatment was associated with a shorter hospital stay and a shorter duration of intravenous and systemic antibiotic treatment. Implant survival regarding re-resection arthroplasty and chronic oral antibiotic suppression as primary endpoints was not significant different statistically between two groups (p = 0.317). The 1-year implant survival rates were 91.7% in the short-course group and 89.8% in the standard-course group. The 5-year implant survival rates were 85.2% and 74.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

After the first stage of resection arthroplasty for a two-stage exchange arthroplasty, a short course of antibiotic treatment had similar implant survival rates in comparison to the standard 6-week course. With radical debridement combined with an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer along with serial monitoring of the patient, a short course antibiotic treatment may be adequate in patients with TKA-PJI.

A preliminary study of the novel antibiotic-loaded cement computer-aided design-articulating spacer for the treatment of periprosthetic knee infection

BACKGROUND

In comparison to static spacers, articulating spacers have been shown to result in a similar infection eradication rate in two-stage revision of periprosthetic knee infections. However, the optimal construct for articulating spacers has not been identified yet. The aim of this study was to present a preliminary result of treatment for periprosthetic knee infection using a novel computer-aided design (CAD)-articulating spacer.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 32 consecutive cases of chronic periprosthetic knee infection occurring from January 2015 to December 2015. In these cases, we used an antibiotic-loaded, optimized CAD-articulating spacer based on the retrieved knee prosthesis. Evaluation included infection eradication rate, the Hospital of Special Surgery (HSS) knee score, range of motion (ROM), and spacer-related mechanical complications. All cases were regularly followed-up for 2 years minimum.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight of 32 patients (87.5%) had infection eradication; 18 patients (56.3%) received reimplantation successfully. The mean interval between spacer insertion and reimplantation was 8.8 months (range 4.0-12.5 months). The mean HSS knee score and ROM significantly increased during each interval (p < 0.0001 for both). The mean HSS knee scores were 31.2 (range 20-48) at initial visit, 65.4 (range 60-78.8) at 1 month after spacer insertion, and 84.2 (range 78-90) at 3 months after reimplantation (p < 0.0001). The mean ROM were 72.0° (range 15-100°), 85.6° (range 35-110°), and 102.0° (range 80-122°), respectively (p = 0.002). Two (6.3%) spacer-related mechanical complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The CAD-articulating spacer in two-staged revision of periprosthetic knee infection significantly controlled infection, improved clinical outcomes, increased ROM, and decreased mechanical complications in the preliminary study. Further larger clinical studies are needed to confirm the findings presented here.