Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Brexucabtagene Autoleucel (ZUMA-2) and Pirtobrutinib (BRUIN) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma Previously Treated with a Covalent Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor

INTRODUCTION

Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) often require multiple lines of treatment and have a poor prognosis, particularly after failing covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (cBTKi) therapy. Newer treatments such as brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel, chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy) and pirtobrutinib (non-covalent BTKi) show promise in improving outcomes.

METHODS

Without direct comparative evidence, an unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison was conducted to estimate the relative treatment effects of brexu-cel and pirtobrutinib for post-cBTKi R/R MCL. Using logistic propensity score models, individual patient-level data from ZUMA-2 brexu-cel-infused population (N = 68) were weighted to match pre-specified clinically relevant prognostic factors based on study-level data from the BRUIN cBTKi pre-treated cohort (N = 90). The base-case model incorporated the five most pertinent factors reported in ≥ 50% of both trial populations: morphology, MCL International Prognostic Index, number of prior lines of therapy, disease stage, and prior autologous stem cell transplant. A sensitivity analysis additionally incorporated TP53 mutation and Ki-67 proliferation. Relative treatment effects were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) or hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

In the base-case model, brexu-cel was associated with higher rates of objective response (OR 10.39 [95% CI 2.81-38.46]) and complete response (OR 10.11 [95% CI 4.26-24.00]), and improved progression-free survival (HR 0.44 [95% CI 0.25-0.75]), compared to pirtobrutinib. Overall survival and duration of response favored brexu-cel over pirtobrutinib but the differences crossed the bounds for statistical significance. Findings were consistent across the adjusted and unadjusted analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that brexu-cel may offer clinically and statistically significant benefits regarding objective response, complete response, and progression-free survival compared to pirtobrutinib among patients with R/R MCL after prior cBTKi therapy. Given the short follow-up and high degree of censoring in BRUIN, an analysis incorporating updated BRUIN data may provide more definitive overall survival results.

Pirtobrutinib: A novel non-covalent BTK inhibitor for the treatment of adults with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma

OBJECTIVE

To provide a comprehensive review of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and efficacy of a new Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), pirtobrutinib for relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (r/r MCL).

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was conducted through PubMed MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the FDA website (January 2018-January 2023) using the following key terms: lymphoma, non-covalent, Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), and relapse. Relevant English language monographs, studies, and abstracts conducted in humans were reviewed and considered.

DATA SUMMARY

Pirtobrutinib, a novel non-covalent BTKi, was granted accelerated approval for treatment of r/r MCL on January 27th, 2023, based on an open-label, multi-center phase 1/2 BRUIN trial. In phase l, 61 patients with r/r MCL received seven dose levels of pirtobrutinib (25-300 mg). There was no reported maximum tolerated dose or dose-limiting toxicities during this study period. In phase 2, 56 r/r MCL evaluable efficacy patients received pirtobrutinib 200 mg daily. The overall response rate (ORR) was 52% (95% CI 38-65). Additionally, patients who received a previous covalent BTKi, ORR was 52% (95% CI 38-66). Neutropenia was the most common adverse reaction reported as a grade 3 or higher.

CONCLUSION

Pirtobrutinib has demonstrated safety and efficacy in heavily pre-treated adult patients with r/r MCL. Advantages of this drug include its usage in patients whose malignancy is resistant to current BTKi, tolerability, and response rate. Multiple clinical trials are underway to determine the efficacy of pirtobrutinib in other B-cell malignancies.

Next-Generation Sequencing-Optimal Sequencing of Therapies in Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This research paper aims to provide an overview of evidence-based sequencing of therapies in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in the era of targeted drugs.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the absence of data from randomized clinical trials comparing novel agents head-to-head, growing evidence suggests that patients with late relapse (> 2 years) after fixed-duration therapies benefit from identical retreatment, whereas a class switch is favorable in those with short-lived remissions or progressive disease on continuous drug intake. Treatment of patients previously exposed to both covalent inhibitors of BTK and BCL2 remains an unmet medical need. Novel drugs, in particular noncovalent BTKI, show promising efficacy in this difficult-to-treat subgroup in early clinical trials. The optimal sequencing of therapies in CLL requires consideration of individual patient factors and disease characteristics. Double-refractory disease continuous to pose a clinical challenge with a focus on participation in clinical trials whenever possible.

New Treatment Options for Newly-Diagnosed and Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

OPINION STATEMENT

The better understanding of the biology of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) gained over the past decade has led to the development and introduction of several targeted drugs, with an demonstrable improvement in the prognosis for this currently incurable condition. Currently, Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors, venetoclax, and CD20 monoclonal antibodies are the key elements in the treatment of both previously untreated and relapsed/refractory CLL patients. Ibrutinib was the first BTK inhibitor approved for clinical use, and showed excellent efficacy and an acceptable safety profile. Following this, the better-tolerated second-generation irreversible BTK inhibitors acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib have been introduced for the treatment of lymphoid malignancies, and acalabrutinib was approved for CLL. When used as single drugs, BTK inhibitors are given continuously until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression; however, when combined with venetoclax and/or CD20 antibodies, they induce deeper response and can be given for a limited time. Recently, promising new reversible BTK inhibitors pirtobrutinib and nemtabrutinib were discovered, and these seem to be more active and better tolerated than their irreversible predecessors. However, they are in an early phase of development and are not currently approved for CLL. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors idelalisib and duvelisib are highly effective in patients with relapsed CLL, including high-risk disease. The major limitations for their use are adverse events, mostly of autoimmune origin (hepatitis, enteritis/colitis, and pneumonitis). Otherwise, cellular therapies like allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells and bispecific monoclonal antibodies offer promise for patients who have failed BTK inhibitors and venetoclax treatment. In the coming years, it is likely that novel targeted therapies will replace immunochemotherapy regimens in most patients.