Real-world outcomes associated with bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy in platinum-resistant ovarian Cancer

OBJECTIVES

The addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy for platinum-resistant (PL-R) ovarian cancer (OC) improved progression-free (PFS) but not overall survival (OS) in clinical trials. We explored real-world outcomes in Ontario, Canada, and compared survival in the pre- and post-bevacizumab era.

METHODS

Administrative databases were utilized to identify all patients treated with bevacizumab for PL-R OC. Time on treatment (ToT) was used as surrogate for PFS. Median OS was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors associated with ToT/OS were identified using a Cox proportional hazard model. A before and after comparative effectiveness analysis was performed to determine mOS for patients treated pre- and post-bevacizumab approval.

RESULTS

From 2017 to 2019, 176 patients received bevacizumab. Median ToT was 3 months and OS was 11 months. Sixty-four percent received liposomal doxorubicin and 34% received paclitaxel. ToT (6 vs 3 months; HR 0.44; p < 0.0001) and OS (14 vs 9 months; HR 0.45; p = 0.0089) were longer with bevacizumab/paclitaxel. OS was not significantly different pre- and post-bevacizumab funding (8 vs 9 months; HR 1.01; 0.937). Median OS increased for those receiving paclitaxel (6 vs 11 months), but those in the post group were younger, more likely to have undergone primary surgery and had less co-morbidities.

CONCLUSION

Real-world outcomes with bevacizumab in PL-R OC are inferior to those in the pivotal clinical trial. Survival has not significantly improved since funding became publicly available, indicating a substantial efficacy-effectiveness gap between trial and real-world outcomes. Median OS and ToT were significantly better when bevacizumab was given with paclitaxel.

Efficacy and safety of VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Almost all patients with ovarian cancer will experience relapse and eventually develop platinum-resistant. The poor prognosis and limited treatment options have prompted the search for novel approaches in managing platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC). Therefore, a meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) /VEGF receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors for PROC.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of online databases was conducted to identify randomized clinical trials published until December 31, 2022. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) was calculated for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while pooled odds ratio (OR) was calculated for objective response rate (ORR) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Subgroup analysis was further performed to investigate the source of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

In total, 1097 patients from eight randomized clinical trials were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled HRs of OS (HR = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.62-0.84, p < 0.0001) and PFS (HR = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.45-0.59, p < 0.0001) demonstrated a significant prolongation in the combination group compared to chemotherapy alone for PROC. In addition, combination therapy demonstrated a superior ORR compared to monotherapy (OR = 2.34; 95%CI: 1.27-4.32, p < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis indicated that the combination treatment of VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors and chemotherapy was significantly more effective than monochemotherapy in terms of OS (HR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.61-0.84, p < 0.0001), PFS (HR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.42-0.57, p < 0.0001), and ORR (OR = 2.97; 95% CI: 1.89-4.67, p < 0.0001). Although the combination therapy was associated with higher incidences of hypertension, mucositis, proteinuria, diarrhea, and hand-foot syndrome compared to monochemotherapy, these toxicities were manageable and well-tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis demonstrated that combination therapy with VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors yielded better clinical outcomes for patients with PROC compared to monochemotherapy, especially when combined with chemotherapy. This analysis provides more treatment options for patients with PROC.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

[ https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO ], Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), identifier: CRD42023402050.

A novel combination of niraparib and anlotinib in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: Efficacy and safety results from the phase II, multi-center ANNIE study

BACKGROUND

Patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (PROC) face poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Single-agent antiangiogenics and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors both show some activities in platinum-resistant diseases. The ANNIE study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the novel combination of the PARP inhibitor niraparib and the antiangiogenic anlotinib in patients with PROC.

METHODS

ANNIE is a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04376073) conducted at three hospitals in China. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer that recurred within 6 months of last platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients with prior PARP inhibitor exposure were excluded. The enrolled patients received oral niraparib 200 mg or 300 mg (baseline body weight-directed) once daily continuously and anlotinib 10 mg (12 mg before protocol amendment) once daily on days 1-14 of each 21-day cycle until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR).

FINDINGS

Between May 22, 2020, and April 22, 2021, 40 patients were enrolled and treated. Thirty-six patients underwent post-baseline tumour assessments. By data cut-off (January 31, 2022), median follow-up was 15.4 months (95% CI 12.6-17.7). Intention-to-treat ORR was 50.0% (95% CI 33.8-66.2), including one complete response and 19 partial responses. Median (95% CI) progression-free survival and overall survival were 9.2 months (7.4-11.9) and 15.3 months (13.9-not evaluable), respectively. Drug-related, grade ≥3 TEAEs were reported in 26 (68%) patients. There were no treatment-related deaths.

INTERPRETATION

Niraparib plus anlotinib showed promising antitumour activity in patients with PROC. This oral combination warrants further investigation as a potential novel, convenient treatment option for patients with PROC.

FUNDING

Zai Lab (Shanghai) Co., Ltd; Jiangsu Chia Tai-Tianqing Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd; the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82102783).

DICE: Dual mTorc Inhibition in advanCed/recurrent Epithelial ovarian cancer resistant to standard treatment-a study protocol for a randomised trial investigating a novel therapy called TAK228

Background

The standard initial treatment for ovarian cancer is surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy and potentially maintenance therapy with avastin or inhibitors of poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP). While a proportion of women are cured by this approach, the vast majority will relapse and become resistant to platinum chemotherapy either initially or on subsequent treatment. There is an unmet need to improve response to treatment and quality of life in these women. TAK228 is a novel therapy that can be added to standard treatment in the participant population and the aim of the DICE trial is to assess its effectiveness. Laboratory and clinical research has shown that these ovarian cancers may respond to the molecular target of a drug such as TAK228, and there have been studies using it in other advanced solid tumours including endometrial cancer.

Methods

One hundred twenty-four eligible women will be recruited from participating research sites in the United Kingdom (UK) and Germany. Randomised participants will receive either weekly paclitaxel alone (standard treatment, n = 62) or TAK228 plus weekly paclitaxel (n = 62) until the cancer significantly worsens; there are significant adverse events or any other protocol-defined stopping criteria. Participants will be monitored for response to treatment (using radiological imaging), adverse events and quality of life during both randomised treatment and subsequent follow-up.

Discussion

The primary objective/endpoint of the study is to compare the two treatments in terms of progression-free survival, or the length of time that each participant is alive without the cancer significantly worsening according to defined assessment criteria. If the addition of TAK228 to weekly paclitaxel chemotherapy is shown to significantly improve this statistically, and adverse events and quality of life are not significantly worse than standard treatment, then TAK228 plus weekly paclitaxel could potentially be taken forward within the context of a larger phase III trial.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.govNCT03648489. Registered on 27 August 2018.

Statistical analysis plan for the Dual mTorc Inhibition in advanCed/recurrent Epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer (of clear cell, endometrioid and high-grade serous type, and carcinosarcoma) trial (DICE)

BACKGROUND

Treatment for ovarian cancer includes platinum-based chemotherapy, but many women become resistant to chemotherapy, becoming platinum-resistant. Standard of care for these women is weekly paclitaxel chemotherapy, but cancers can often become paclitaxel resistant. TAK228, an investigational dual TORC1/2 inhibitor, is an oral therapy that can be added to standard treatment. The DICE trial is a phase II international multicentre, parallel-group, superiority clinical trial with 1:1, open label randomisation which has the aim of investigating the effectiveness of TAK228 plus weekly paclitaxel. The planned sample size is 124 women (62 per treatment arm) with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To outline the planned analyses for DICE in a statistical analysis plan (SAP) before database hard lock and the start of analysis. This ensures that bias is minimised during the analysis phase.

RESULTS

This SAP provides detailed descriptions of the analysis principles and statistical procedures for analysing primary and secondary outcomes of the trial. The primary outcome is overall progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes include progression-free survival (PFS) at 24 weeks, overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), time to progression (TTP), clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 4 months, Cancer Antigen 125 (CA125) response according to Gynaecological Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) criteria, overall survival (OS), safety and tolerability as assessed by adverse events and the quality-of-life questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-OV28). This detailed description includes significance levels, sensitivity analyses and compliance analysis.

DISCUSSION

The DICE trial will determine whether the addition of TAK228 to weekly paclitaxel chemotherapy shows a statistically significant improvement to participant's progression free and overall survival and that the adverse events (AEs) and quality of life (QoL) are not significantly worse than the standard treatment. The study commenced recruitment in September 2018. An interim analysis was performed in early 2021, the results of which advised continuation of the trial. The study recruitment is ongoing and is due to complete by the end of 2021.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03648489 . Registered on 27 August 2018.

Prise en charge médicale de la récidive du cancer épithélial de l'ovaire: Medical management of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

The panel of therapeutic options available for medical treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer increased over the last years. In late, platinum-sensitive relapse, standard treatment remains platinum-based polychemotherapy. The choice between bevacizumab added to chemotherapy followed by maintenance and inhibitors of poly-(ADP-riboses) polymerases (PARPi) after response to platinum-based therapy should be discussed, taking into account prior treatment, contraindications, and disease characteristics (biology, symptoms…). The addition of bevacizumab at first platinum-sensitive relapse can be considered if it has not been administered in first line, and it is optional (rechallenge) if previously administered (but without Marketing Authorization in this setting). PARPi are indicated for maintenance therapy after response to platinum-based chemotherapy (whatever the treatment line), regardless of BRCA mutational status, in case of no prior administration. Early relapses are associated with poor prognosis and therapeutic options are more limited. They are treated by monochemotherapy without platinum agents, associated with bevacizumab if not administered previously. Beyond first early relapse, there is no standard and inclusion in a clinical trial should be proposed if possible. Several clinical studies assessing associations of immunotherapy and chemotherapy and/or antiangiogenic drugs and/or targeted therapies (such as PARPi) are ongoing in early or late relapse.

Revisiting antibody-drug conjugates and their predictive biomarkers in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

Until to date, platinum derived drugs are still the backbone of treating ovarian cancer (OC). Most patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy develop resistance during the course of their management. The treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) is challenging. Few therapeutic options are available for patients with this aggressive disease. Besides, there are liminal advances regarding new anticancer drugs as well as validated predictive biomarkers of clinical outcomes in this setting. The enrollment of PROC patients in interventional studies is limited as compared to newly launched clinical trials for platinum-sensitive OC. Enthusiastically, the emergence of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) has provided promising findings for further clinical development in PROC. ADCs have the advantage to selectively deliver cytotoxic drugs to cancer cells expressing several of antigens using specific monoclonal antibodies based on the concept of immune bioconjugation. This innovative class of therapeutics showed encouraging early signs of clinical efficacy in PROC particularly mirvetuximab soravtansine that has been successfully introduced into three randomized and controlled phase III studies. In this review, the evidence from clinical trials supporting the development of ADCs targeting folate receptor alpha, sodium-dependent phosphate transporter 2B, dipeptidase 3, mesothelin, mucin 16, and tissue factor using various cytotoxic payloads in PROC is reviewed.

A phase 1b study of intraperitoneal oncolytic viral immunotherapy in platinum-resistant or refractory ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to assess safety and adverse events associated with intraperitoneal Olvi-Vec virotherapy in patients with platinum-resistant or refractory ovarian cancer (PRROC). Secondary objectives included objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1 and progression-free survival (PFS).

METHODS

Olvi-Vec is a modified vaccinia virus that causes oncolysis and immune activation. An open-label phase 1b trial using a 3 + 3 dose escalation was conducted. Intraperitoneal Olvi-Vec was given as monotherapy in two consecutive daily doses. Translational analyses included anti-virus antibody levels, viral shedding, circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and T cells.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (median age: 69 years, range: 45-77) with median 5 prior therapies (range: 2-10) and 2 prior platinum lines (range: 1-5) were enrolled. There were three dose level cohorts: 3 × 10⁹ (n = 6), 1 × 10¹⁰ (n = 5), and 2.5 × 10¹⁰ (n = 1) plaque forming units (PFU)/day on two consecutive days. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) included G1/G2 nausea (n = 6), fever (n = 6), abdominal distention (n = 5), and abdominal pain (n = 4). There were no Grade 4 TRAEs, no dose relationship to TRAEs, and no deaths attributed to Olvi-Vec. The ORR was 9% (1/11). Stable disease (SD) was 64% (7/11), and SD ≥15 weeks was 46% (5/11). Median PFS was 15.7 weeks (95%CI: 5.7-34.5), including extended PFS in four patients (23.2, 34.5, 59.4+ and 70.8 weeks). Three patients had extended overall survival (deceased 33.6 months, and alive with disease at 54 and 59 months). CTCs diminished in 6/8 (75%) baseline-positive patients. Immune activation was demonstrated from virus-enhanced tumor infiltration of CD8+ T-cells and activation of tumor-specific T-cells in peripheral blood.

CONCLUSIONS

Oncolytic viral therapy with intraperitoneal Olvi-Vec showed promising safety, clinical activities, and immune activation in patients with PRROC, warranting further clinical investigation.

An open-label phase I dose-escalation study of the safety and pharmacokinetics of DMUC4064A in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES

MUC16 is overexpressed in the majority of human epithelial ovarian cancers (OC). DMUC4064A is a humanized anti-MUC16 monoclonal antibody conjugated to the microtubule-disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin E. This trial assessed the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary activity of DMUC4064A in patients with platinum-resistant OC.

METHODS

DMUC4064A was administered once every 3 weeks to patients in 1.0-5.6 mg/kg dose escalation cohorts, followed by cohort expansion at the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D).

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were enrolled and received a median of 5 cycles (range 1-20) of DMUC4064A. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached; 5.2 mg/kg was the RP2D based on the overall tolerability profile. The most common adverse events were fatigue, nausea, abdominal pain, constipation, blurred vision, diarrhea, and anemia. Sixteen patients (25%) experienced related grade ≥ 3 toxicities. Twenty-six patients (40%) experienced ocular toxicities. The exposure of acMMAE was dose proportional, with a half-life of ~6 days. Sixteen patients (25%) experienced confirmed objective partial response (PR or CR) starting at ≥3.2 mg/kg dose levels, while 23 (35%) patients had best responses of PR or CR. Overall, the clinical benefit rate was 42% (27 patients with a best response [confirmed and unconfirmed] of CR, or PR or SD lasting ≥6 months). Among the 54 patients with high MUC16 immunohistochemistry scores, the clinical benefit rate was 46% (25 patients). Median progression-free survival was 3.9 months overall.

CONCLUSIONS

In this Phase I study, DMUC4064A demonstrated a tolerable safety profile along with encouraging efficacy in the indication of platinum-resistant OC.

Combination ATR and PARP Inhibitor (CAPRI): A phase 2 study of ceralasertib plus olaparib in patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

Platinum-resistant, high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) has limited treatment options. Preclinical data suggest that poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) and ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related kinase inhibitors (ATRi) are synergistic. CAPRI (NCT03462342) is an investigator-initiated study of olaparib plus ceralasertib in recurrent HGSOC. Herein, we present results from the platinum-resistant cohort.

METHODS

A Simon 2-stage design was utilized. Platinum-resistant HGSOC patients received ceralasertib 160 mg orally daily, days 1-7 and olaparib 300 mg orally twice daily, days 1-28 of a 28-day cycle until toxicity or progression. Primary endpoints were toxicity and efficacy including objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST. Secondary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The null hypothesis (≤5% ORR) would be rejected if there were ≥ 1 responses in 12 patients.

RESULTS

Fourteen PARPi-naïve patients were evaluable for toxicity; 12 were evaluable for response. Three had BRCA1 mutations (1 germline, 2 somatic). Adverse events possibly related to treatment were primarily grade (G) 1/2. G3 toxicities included nausea (14.3%), fatigue (7.1%), anorexia (7.1%), and anemia (7.1%). No objective responses occurred. Best response was stable disease in 9 patients and progressive disease in three. Five patients had a ≥ 20% to <30% reduction in disease burden, including 3 with BRCA1 mutations. Three of 11 patients (27%; 2 with BRCA1 mutations) evaluable by Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup criteria had >50% CA-125 decline, including 2 with CA-125 normalization. Median PFS was 4.2 months overall (90% CI:3.5-8.2) and 8.2 months (3.6 months-not determined) for patients with BRCA1 mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

Olaparib plus ceralasertib is well-tolerated. No objective responses occurred, though a signal of activity was seen particularly in disease associated with BRCA1. Further evaluation of this combination should include alternate dosing strategies in genomically-selected populations.

Lurbinectedin versus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin or topotecan in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: A multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label phase 3 study (CORAIL)

OBJECTIVE

The randomized phase 3 CORAIL trial evaluated whether lurbinectedin improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared to pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) or topotecan in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to lurbinectedin 3.2 mg/m² 1-h i.v. infusion q3wk (experimental arm), versus PLD 50 mg/m² 1-h i.v. infusion q4wk or topotecan 1.50 mg/m² 30-min i.v. infusion Days 1-5 q3wk (control arm). Stratification factors were PS (0 vs. ≥1), prior PFI (1-3 months vs. >3 months), and prior chemotherapy lines (1-2 vs. 3). The primary endpoint was PFS by Independent Review Committee in all randomized patients. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02421588.

RESULTS

442 patients were randomized: 221 in lurbinectedin arm and 221 in control arm (127 PLD and 94 topotecan). With a median follow-up of 25.6 months, median PFS was 3.5 months (95% CI, 2.1-3.7) in the lurbinectedin arm and 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.7-3.8) in the control arm (stratified log-rank p = 0.6294; HR = 1.057). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were most frequent in the control arm: 64.8% vs. 47.9% (p = 0.0005), mainly due to hematological toxicities. The most common grade ≥ 3 AEs were: fatigue (7.3% of patients) and nausea (5.9%) with lurbinectedin; mucosal inflammation (8.5%) and fatigue (8.0%) in the control arm.

CONCLUSIONS

The primary endpoint of improvement in PFS was not met. Lurbinectedin showed similar antitumor efficacy and was better tolerated than current standard of care in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Efficacy and safety of tivozanib in recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer, an NCCN phase II trial

OBJECTIVE

Tivozanib is a potent selective pan-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor with a long half-life. This study assessed its activity in patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer (OC).

METHODS

This open-label phase II study used a Simon's two-stage design. Eligible patients had recurrent, platinum-resistant OC and measurable or detectable disease. There was no limit on the number of prior regimens. Treatment consisted of tivozanib 1.5 mg orally once daily for 21 days in a 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity assessment.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were enrolled, and 30 were treated. The median age was 59.5 years, and median number of prior regimens was 4 (range 1-9). Twenty-four patients were evaluable for response, and four (16.7%) achieved a partial response (PR; ORR = 16.7%). An additional fourteen (58.3%) patients had stable disease (SD). The clinical benefit rate (PR + SD) was 75.0%, and the median duration of objective response was 5.7 months. For all patients on trial, the median PFS was 4.1 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.7-5.8) and OS 8.6 months (95% CI: 5.4-12.5). There were no treatment-related deaths. Serious adverse events occurred in 13.3% of patients and included small intestinal perforation or obstruction and stroke. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 60% of patients, including hypertension (26.7%) and fatigue (10%).

CONCLUSIONS

Tivozanib is effective in patients with recurrent OC, with moderate toxicity and no treatment-related deaths, supporting its further development.

Immunotherapy for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is characterized by a high mortality on incidence ratio. Although the majority of patients achieve complete response after primary treatment, approximately 65-80% of patients recur with the first 5 years. Platinum-free interval is one of the main prognostic factors. Patients recurring with 6 months within the end of platinum-based chemotherapy are characterized by poor prognosis. To date no effective treatment modality are identified for those patients. The mainstay of treatment for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer is single agent chemotherapy. Other treatment modalities have tested in this setting with discouraging results. Growing evidence suggested that immunotherapy would improve outcomes of patients with various types of solid tumors including melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer as well as uterine malignancies. Here, we reviewed current evidence on the adoption of immunotherapy in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. To date no mature evidence supports the routine adoption of immunotherapy in ovarian cancer patients. Further strategies have to be explored.

Ofranergene obadenovec (VB-111) in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer; favorable response rates in a phase I/II study are associated with an immunotherapeutic effect

OBJECTIVE

Report final results of a phase I/II study of VB-111, a targeted anti-cancer gene therapy with a dual mechanism: anti angiogenic/vascular disruption and induction of an anti-tumor directed immune response, in combination with paclitaxel in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Study NCT01711970 was a prospective, open label, dose escalation study assessing combination treatment of VB-111 and weekly paclitaxel. In the Phase I part of the study, patients were treated with escalating doses of intravenous VB-111 and paclitaxel. In Phase 2, patients were treated with therapeutic doses of VB-111 and paclitaxel 80 mg/m². Assessments included safety, overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and tumor response (CA-125 and RECIST).

RESULTS

21 patients with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer were enrolled. 17/21 received the therapeutic dose. Patients had a median of 3 prior lines of therapy. Half of the subjects were platinum refractory, and half were previously treated with antiangiogenics. No DLTs were observed. VB-111 was well tolerated and associated with mild flu-like symptoms. In the therapeutic dose cohort, a 58% CA-125 GCIG response rate was seen in evaluable patients. The median OS was 16.6 months in patients treated with therapeutic dose compared to 5.8 months in sub-therapeutic dose (p = 0.028). Tumor specimens taken after treatment demonstrated tumor infiltrated with cytotoxic CD8 T-cells in regions of apoptotic cancer cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with VB-111 in combination with paclitaxel was safe and well tolerated. Favorable tumor responses and overall survival outcomes were associated with induction of an immunotherapeutic effect.

A phase II study of the combination chemotherapy of bevacizumab and gemcitabine in women with platinum-resistant recurrent epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer

INTRODUCTION

Bevacizumab and gemcitabine are key drugs for treating recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. However, information about the combination of bevacizumab and gemcitabine is insufficient. We conducted a phase II study to assess the feasibility, clinical activity, and toxicity of this combination chemotherapy.

METHODS

This study included women with platinum-resistant recurrent epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer who received one to three regimens of platinum-based chemotherapy between April 1, 2015 and December 31, 2018. The patients received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 21 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the completion rate of three cycles of chemotherapy. This study was registered in the University Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000016619).

RESULTS

Among the 19 patients, 18 (95%) received ≥3 and 9 (47%) received ≥6 cycles of the study therapy. The objective response rate was 42% (complete response of 16% and partial response of 26%), and the clinical control rate was 84%. Hematological toxicity included neutropenia grade 3/4 in 9 patients (47%), anemia grade 3/4 in 2 (11%), and thrombocytopenia grade 3/4 in 1 (5%). One patient (5%) had grade 3 hypertension, and 1 (5%) had grade 3 protein urea. Possibly related grade 3 pulmonary toxicity was observed in 1 patient. Three patients needed dose reduction of gemcitabine to 800 mg/m² due to treatment delay by 15 to 21 days on day1. There was no treatment delay more than 14 days on day 8. The median progression-free survival duration was 5.1 months and median overall survival duration was 21.3 months.

CONCLUSION

The combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and bevacizumab was feasible, effective and safe. This combination chemotherapy may be explored in a further randomized trial.

Real-world effectiveness of bevacizumab based on AURELIA in platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (REBECA): A Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group study (KGOG 3041)

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of bevacizumab with single-agent chemotherapy for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer in a real-world setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We enrolled recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients from 27 institutions. All had received bevacizumab with single-agent chemotherapy (weekly paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), topotecan) between 2015 and 2017 for second- or third-line chemotherapy in routine clinical practice. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Secondary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), PFS2, overall survival, duration of chemotherapy, and reasons for discontinuing chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Of 391 patients, 259 (66.2%) received bevacizumab with PLD, 94 (24.0%) with topotecan, and 38 (9.7%) with weekly paclitaxel. The median PFS was 6.1 months with all forms of bevacizumab-containing therapy. Although the cohort with weekly paclitaxel had a better PFS than the PLD cohort (P = 0.028), this finding was not found in patients with a previous platinum-free interval of less than three months. The median duration of therapy was five cycles (range, one to 20 cycles), and 29 patients (7.4%) discontinued treatment because of adverse events from bevacizumab-containing regimens. The PLD cohort had fewer grade ≥ 3 adverse events than the other regimens (PLD, 35.8%; weekly paclitaxel, 52.6%; topotecan, 51.1%; P = 0.012), especially events of hematologic toxicities.

CONCLUSION

In Korean ovarian cancer patients, the safety and effectiveness of chemotherapy with bevacizumab in a real-world setting was consistent with the results from a randomized controlled study. The effectiveness and toxicity profiles varied among the chemotherapy regimens, and this finding should be considered in practice.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT03367182.

Real-world effectiveness of bevacizumab based on AURELIA in platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (REBECA): A Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group study (KGOG 3041)

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of bevacizumab with single-agent chemotherapy for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer in a real-world setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We enrolled recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients from 27 institutions. All had received bevacizumab with single-agent chemotherapy (weekly paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), topotecan) between 2015 and 2017 for second- or third-line chemotherapy in routine clinical practice. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Secondary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), PFS2, overall survival, duration of chemotherapy, and reasons for discontinuing chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Of 391 patients, 259 (66.2%) received bevacizumab with PLD, 94 (24.0%) with topotecan, and 38 (9.7%) with weekly paclitaxel. The median PFS was 6.1 months with all forms of bevacizumab-containing therapy. Although the cohort with weekly paclitaxel had a better PFS than the PLD cohort (P = 0.028), this finding was not found in patients with a previous platinum-free interval of less than three months. The median duration of therapy was five cycles (range, one to 20 cycles), and 29 patients (7.4%) discontinued treatment because of adverse events from bevacizumab-containing regimens. The PLD cohort had fewer grade ≥ 3 adverse events than the other regimens (PLD, 35.8%; weekly paclitaxel, 52.6%; topotecan, 51.1%; P = 0.012), especially events of hematologic toxicities.

CONCLUSION

In Korean ovarian cancer patients, the safety and effectiveness of chemotherapy with bevacizumab in a real-world setting was consistent with the results from a randomized controlled study. The effectiveness and toxicity profiles varied among the chemotherapy regimens, and this finding should be considered in practice.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT03367182.

Engrailed-2 (EN2) - a novel biomarker in epithelial ovarian cancer

Background

Epithelial ovarian cancer is a common malignancy, with no clinically approved diagnostic biomarker. Engrailed-2 (EN2) is a homeodomain-containing transcription factor, essential during embryological neural development, which is dysregulated in several cancer types. We evaluated the expression of EN2 in Epithelial ovarian cancer, and reviewed its role as a biomarker.

Methods

We evaluated 8 Epithelial ovarian cancer cell lines, along with > 100 surgical specimens from the Royal Surrey County Hospital (2009–2014). In total, 108 tumours and 5 normal tissue specimens were collected. En2 mRNA was evaluated by semi-quantitative RT-PCR. Histological sub-type, and platinum-sensitive/−resistant status were compared. Protein expression was assessed in cell lines (immunofluorescence), and in > 150 tumours (immunohistochemistry).

Results

En2 mRNA expression was elevated in serous ovarian tumours compared with normal ovary (p < 0.001), particularly in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (p < 0.0001) and in platinum-resistant tumours (p = 0.0232). Median Overall Survival and Progression-free Survival were reduced with high En2 expression (OS = 28 vs 42 months, p = 0.0329; PFS = 8 vs 27 months; p = 0.0004). Positive cytoplasmic EN2 staining was demonstrated in 78% of Epithelial ovarian cancers, with absence in normal ovary. EN2 positive high-grade serous ovarian cancer patients had a shorter PFS (10 vs 17.5 months; p = 0.0103).

Conclusion

The EN2 transcription factor is a novel ovarian cancer biomarker. It demonstrates prognostic value, correlating with worse Overall Survival and Progression-free Survival. It is hoped that further work will validate its use as a biomarker, and provide insight into the role of EN2 in the development, progression and spread of ovarian cancer.

A phase II study of apatinib in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

Antiangiogenic treatments have been implicated to play a major role in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Apatinib, a novel oral antiangiogenic agent targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR2), is currently being studied in different tumor types and is already used in gastric adenocarcinoma. This study was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of apatinib in patients with recurrent, pretreated EOC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant, pre-treated EOC who failed available standard chemotherapy were enrolled. Apatinib was administered as 500mg daily. Primary objective is the overall response rate (ORR) according to MASS criteria. Secondary objectives are progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), safety and tolerability. The treatment duration is until disease progression or intolerability of apatinib.

RESULTS

29 eligible patients were enrolled in this multicenter, open-label, single arm study and received apatinib for a median of 36.8weeks (range 13-64.8weeks). Median follow-up time was 12months. 28 patients were eligible for efficacy analysis. ORR is 41.4% (95% confidence interval (CI), 23.3%-59.4%). DCR is 68.9% (95% CI, 52.1%-85.8%). Median PFS is 5.1months (95% CI, 3.8m-6.5m). Median OS is 14.5months (95% CI, 12.4m-16.4m). The most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were hand-foot syndrome (51.7%), hypertension (34.6%), nausea and vomiting (31.0%). 3 patients had no significant toxicity. 9 patients experienced grade 3 treatment-related AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Apatinib 500mg daily p.o. is a feasible treatment in patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant, pretreated EOC. Multi-center prospective studies enrolling more patients are needed.

Combination chemotherapy with irinotecan and gemcitabine for taxane/platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer: a multicenter phase I/II trial (GOGO-Ov 6)

PURPOSE

To develop a new therapeutic strategy for taxane/platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian and primary peritoneal cancers, we evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of irinotecan and gemcitabine combination chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients with taxane/platinum-resistant/refractory cancer received escalating doses of irinotecan and gemcitabine (level 1: 80 and 800 mg/m², respectively; level 2: 100 and 1000 mg/m²) on days 1 and 8 on a 21-day cycle. Genotyping for UGT1A1*6 and *28 polymorphisms was performed for possible adverse irinotecan sensitivity.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients were enrolled. The recommended dose was defined as 100 mg/m² irinotecan and 1000 mg/m² gemcitabine (level 2). The observed common grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (60%), anemia (17.1%), diarrhea (8.6%), thrombocytopenia (5.7%) and nausea (5.7%). Groups homozygous for UGT1A1*6 or *28 were associated with grade 3/4 neutropenia and diarrhea. Objective responses were 20%, including one complete response and six partial responses. In 29 patients treated with the recommended dose, the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.8 months (95% CI 2.1-6.0 months) and 17.4 months (95% CI 9.9-21.9 months), respectively, while the 1-year survival rate was 58.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination chemotherapy with irinotecan and gemcitabine represents a safe and effective treatment combination for taxane/platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian and primary peritoneal cancers.

A multicenter, open-label, expanded phase 2 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of etirinotecan pegol, a polymer conjugate of irinotecan, in women with recurrent platinum-resistant or refractory ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

Etirinotecan pegol (EP) is a novel polyethylene glycol conjugated form of irinotecan with documented activity in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC). We report the results of the expanded portion of a phase II study of EP in patients with PROC who received prior pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) or who were unable to receive it.

METHODS

This multicenter, open-label, phase II study evaluated EP q21d for PROC. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Patient populations evaluated included a modified intent-to-treat (mITT) group consisting of all patients who received at least one dose and with measurable disease and a primary efficacy (pEFF) group (subset of the mITT population who received prior PLD).

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-nine patients were enrolled. Of the 132 patients in the mITT group, 20 achieved an ORR (15.2%; 95% CI 9.5-22.4); median PFS and OS were 4.4 months and 10.2 months, respectively. In the pEFF group (n=104), 15 patients (14.4%; 95% CI 8.3-22.7) achieved an ORR; median PFS and OS were 4.4 months and 10.9 months, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were diarrhea (20%), abdominal pain (17%), vomiting (14%), dehydration (13%), and nausea (13%). Severe diarrhea was reduced to 15% with strict adherence to screening and management guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the activity and safety of single-agent EP in patients with PROC, including patients who received prior PLD. Further evaluation earlier in the disease course and in combination is warranted.

Comparison of bevacizumab alone or with chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer patients

BACKGROUND

To compare the efficacy of chemotherapy (C) combined with bevacizumab (Bev) versus Bev alone in recurrent, heavily pretreated epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

METHODS

A multicenter analysis of patients treated from 2004 to 2011 was performed. Demographic, treatment, response, and adverse event information were obtained. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 277 patients (median age: 58years), the majority had Stage III and IV (86%) disease, and 72% had serous histology. 244 (88%) were treated with C+Bev and 33 (12%) with Bev. Corresponding median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.7 and 6.7months, and median overall survival (OS) was 14.3 and 10.5months, respectively. The chemotherapeutic agents combined with Bev and the median OS include: pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (n=19, OS of 20.4months), taxanes (n=55, OS of 20.2months), gemcitabine (n=106, OS of 14.1months), topotecan (n=43, OS of 13months), and cyclophosphamide (n=21, OS of 13months). There was no significant difference in toxicities between the C+Bev vs. Bev alone group.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective analysis supports that combination chemotherapy and bevacizumab prolongs PFS and OS compared with bevacizumab alone.

Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy in women with recurrent ovarian cancer: A phase 2 study

OBJECTIVE

Recurrent ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis (ROCPC) is resistant to systemic chemotherapy. We assessed the safety and activity of laparoscopic pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in women with this cancer.

METHODS

In this open-label, single-arm phase 2 study, patients underwent 3 courses q 28-42 days of PIPAC with doxorubicin 1·5 mg/m(2) followed by cisplatin 7·5 mg/m(2). A pressure of 12 mm Hg and a temperature of 37 °C were applied for 30 min/course. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who had an objective tumor response (OTR) according to RECIST version 1.1 criteria. Analysis was by intention to treat. Secondary endpoints were tumor regression on histology, PC Index improvement on repeated video-laparoscopy, and quality of life measured with the EORTC QLQ-30 questionnaire.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients were enrolled. Laparoscopic non-access rate was 11/64 (17%). 53 patients were eligible for analyses. 33/53 (62%) patients had an OTR - three had a partial response and 30 patients had stable disease. Tumor regression on histology and PC Index improvement were observed in 26/34 (76%) and in 26/34 (76%) patients who underwent all 3 PIPACs. There were no treatment-related deaths. No grade 4 toxicity was observed. Grade 3 toxicities were trocar hernia (n=2), bowel obstruction (n=2), abdominal pain (n=2), hematoma (n=1), intraoperative bleeding (n=1), and cystitis with urosepsis (n=1). EORTC QLQ-30 global physical health scores, nausea/vomiting, appetite loss, diarrhea, and constipation improved during therapy.

CONCLUSION

PIPAC is well tolerated and active in women with ROCPC and warrants further investigation in these patients.

Cost-effectiveness of adding bevacizumab to first line therapy for patients with advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate, from a societal perspective, the cost-effectiveness of adding bevacizumab to first-line therapy based on outcomes from the GOG-218 and ICON-7 trials.

METHODS

A three-state Markov model was used. The time horizon was until the death of 99% of the initial cohort of 1000 individuals. Costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were discounted at an annual rate of 3%. All costs were adjusted to 2013 USD. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was reported as incremental cost per QALY gained. The robustness of the result was checked with one-way sensitivity analyses and for relevant clinical situations (i.e. varying the drug of choice to treat cancer recurrence). Subgroup analysis was conducted to identify subgroup of population for whom the strategy could be cost-effective. The potential impact of biosimilar bevacizumab was considered, using a 30% price reduction.

RESULTS

For the GOG-218 study protocol, widely followed in US, the addition of bevacizumab results in an ICER of $2,420,691/QALY. For the ICON-7 study protocol, the ICER is $225,515/QALY. The results of the model were sensitive to the quality of life (QoL) and the median progression free survival (PFS). Biosimilar bevacizumab didn't reduce cost sufficiently to change conclusions. First-line augmentation is cost-effective, with biosimilar bevacizumab, for stage IV patients ($126,169/QALY), ECOG PS1 patients ($116,575/QALY) and for patients with suboptimal residual disease ($122,822/QALY) as per the ICON-7 protocol.

CONCLUSION

Addition of bevacizumab, by in large, is cost-ineffective. It can become cost-effective with the ICON-7 protocol, in patients at high risk of progression using biosimilar bevacizumab.

Activity of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) with cisplatin and doxorubicin in women with recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: preliminary clinical experience

OBJECTIVE

To assess the activity of laparoscopic Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) in women with recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Prospective case series using repeated courses q 28-42 days of PIPAC containing cisplatin 7.5 mg/m(2) and doxorubicin 1.5 mg/m(2) at 12 mmHg and 37°C for 30 min. Objective tumor response was defined as tumor regression on histology and peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) improvement on repeated video-laparoscopy.

RESULTS

34 PIPAC procedures were performed in 18 women, in 8 instances combined with cytoreductive surgery (CRS). Eight women had repeated PIPAC and objective tumor response was observed in 6 (complete remission: 1; partial remission: 2; stable disease: 3). Five adverse events WHO grade ≥ 2 were noted, 3 of them after combined CRS. No perioperative mortality occurred. Median follow-up was 192 days (min. 13-max. 639). Cumulative survival after 400 days was 62% and mean actuarial survival time was 442 days. In a multivariable regression analysis with objective tumor response (yes vs. no) as the dependent variable and PIPAC (1 vs.>1), patient age (<75 vs.≥75 years), serum CA-125 (<1000 vs.>1000 U/mL), and the presence of ascites (yes vs. no) as independent variables, PIPAC independently predicted objective tumor response.

CONCLUSION

PIPAC has activity in women with recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer and should be investigated in prospective clinical trials.