1
|
Zecchi R, Franceschi P, Tigli L, Pioselli B, Mileo V, Murgia X, Salomone F, Pieraccini G, Usada H, Schmidt AF, Hillman NH, Kemp MW, Jobe AH. Surfactant-Assisted Distal Pulmonary Distribution of Budesonide Revealed by Mass Spectrometry Imaging. Pharmaceutics 2021; 13:868. [PMID: 34204670 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13060868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Direct lung administration of budesonide in combination with surfactant reduces the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Although the therapy is currently undergoing clinical development, the lung distribution of budesonide throughout the premature neonatal lung has not yet been investigated. Here, we applied mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) to investigate the surfactant-assisted distal lung distribution of budesonide. Unlabeled budesonide was either delivered using saline as a vehicle (n = 5) or in combination with a standard dose of the porcine surfactant Poractant alfa (n = 5). These lambs were ventilated for one minute, and then the lungs were extracted for MSI analysis. Another group of lambs (n = 5) received the combination of budesonide and Poractant alfa, followed by two hours of mechanical ventilation. MSI enabled the label-free detection and visualization of both budesonide and the essential constituent of Poractant alfa, the porcine surfactant protein C (SP-C). 2D ion intensity images revealed a non-uniform distribution of budesonide with saline, which appeared clustered in clumps. In contrast, the combination therapy showed a more homogeneous distribution of budesonide throughout the sample, with more budesonide distributed towards the lung periphery. We found similar distribution patterns for the SP-C and budesonide in consecutive lung tissue sections, indicating that budesonide was transported across the lungs associated with the exogenous surfactant. After two hours of mechanical ventilation, the budesonide intensity signal in the 2D ion intensity maps dropped dramatically, suggesting a rapid lung clearance and highlighting the relevance of achieving a uniform surfactant-assisted lung distribution of budesonide early after delivery to maximize the anti-inflammatory and maturational effects throughout the lung.
Collapse
|
2
|
Bianco F, Ricci F, Catozzi C, Murgia X, Schlun M, Bucholski A, Hetzer U, Bonelli S, Lombardini M, Pasini E, Nutini M, Pertile M, Minocchieri S, Simonato M, Rosa B, Pieraccini G, Moneti G, Lorenzini L, Catinella S, Villetti G, Civelli M, Pioselli B, Cogo P, Carnielli V, Dani C, Salomone F. From bench to bedside: in vitro and in vivo evaluation of a neonate-focused nebulized surfactant delivery strategy. Respir Res 2019; 20:134. [PMID: 31266508 PMCID: PMC6604359 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-019-1096-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2019] [Accepted: 06/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Non-invasive delivery of nebulized surfactant has been a neonatology long-pursued goal. Nevertheless, the clinical efficacy of nebulized surfactant remains inconclusive, in part, due to the great technical challenges of depositing nebulized drugs in the lungs of preterm infants. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of delivering nebulized surfactant (poractant alfa) in vitro and in vivo with an adapted, neonate-tailored aerosol delivery strategy. Methods Particle size distribution of undiluted poractant alfa aerosols generated by a customized eFlow-Neos nebulizer system was determined by laser diffraction. The theoretical nebulized surfactant lung dose was estimated in vitro in a clinical setting replica including a neonatal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) circuit, a cast of the upper airways of a preterm neonate, and a breath simulator programmed with the tidal breathing pattern of an infant with mild respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). A dose-response study with nebulized surfactant covering the 100–600 mg/kg nominal dose-range was conducted in RDS-modelling, lung-lavaged spontaneously-breathing rabbits managed with nasal CPAP. The effects of nebulized poractant alfa on arterial gas exchange and lung mechanics were assessed. Exogenous alveolar disaturated-phosphatidylcholine (DSPC) in the lungs was measured as a proxy of surfactant deposition efficacy. Results Laser diffraction studies demonstrated suitable aerosol characteristics for inhalation (mass median diameter, MMD = 3 μm). The mean surfactant lung dose determined in vitro was 13.7% ± 4.0 of the 200 mg/kg nominal dose. Nebulized surfactant delivered to spontaneously-breathing rabbits during nasal CPAP significantly improved arterial oxygenation compared to animals receiving CPAP only. Particularly, the groups of animals treated with 200 mg/kg and 400 mg/kg of nebulized poractant alfa achieved an equivalent pulmonary response in terms of oxygenation and lung mechanics as the group of animals treated with instilled surfactant (200 mg/kg). Conclusions The customized eFlow-Neos vibrating-membrane nebulizer system efficiently generated respirable aerosols of undiluted poractant alfa. Nebulized surfactant delivered at doses of 200 mg/kg and 400 mg/kg elicited a pulmonary response equivalent to that observed after treatment with an intratracheal surfactant bolus of 200 mg/kg. This bench-characterized nebulized surfactant delivery strategy is now under evaluation in Phase II clinical trial (EUDRACT No.:2016–004547-36). Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12931-019-1096-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Bianco
- Department of Preclinical Pharmacology, R&D, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A, Parma, Italy
| | - F Ricci
- Department of Preclinical Pharmacology, R&D, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A, Parma, Italy
| | - C Catozzi
- Department of Preclinical Pharmacology, R&D, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A, Parma, Italy
| | - X Murgia
- Scientific Consultancy, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - M Schlun
- PARI Pharma GmbH, Starnberg, Germany
| | | | - U Hetzer
- PARI Pharma GmbH, Starnberg, Germany
| | - S Bonelli
- Department of Preclinical Pharmacology, R&D, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A, Parma, Italy
| | - M Lombardini
- Department of Preclinical Pharmacology, R&D, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A, Parma, Italy
| | - E Pasini
- Department of Preclinical Pharmacology, R&D, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A, Parma, Italy
| | - M Nutini
- Department of Preclinical Pharmacology, R&D, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A, Parma, Italy
| | - M Pertile
- Department of Preclinical Pharmacology, R&D, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A, Parma, Italy
| | - S Minocchieri
- Division of Neonatology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - M Simonato
- Pediatric Research Institute "Città della Speranza", Padova, Italy
| | - B Rosa
- Department of Preclinical Pharmacology, R&D, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A, Parma, Italy
| | - G Pieraccini
- Mass Spectrometry Center (CISM), Polo Biomedico, Careggi University Hospital of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - G Moneti
- Mass Spectrometry Center (CISM), Polo Biomedico, Careggi University Hospital of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - L Lorenzini
- Health Science and Technologies Interdepartmental Center for Industrial Research (HST-ICIR), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - S Catinella
- Department of Preclinical Pharmacology, R&D, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A, Parma, Italy
| | - G Villetti
- Department of Preclinical Pharmacology, R&D, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A, Parma, Italy
| | - M Civelli
- Department of Preclinical Pharmacology, R&D, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A, Parma, Italy
| | - B Pioselli
- Department of Preclinical Pharmacology, R&D, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A, Parma, Italy
| | - P Cogo
- Division of Pediatrics, Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - V Carnielli
- Polytechnic University of Marche and Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy
| | - C Dani
- Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence School of Medicine, Careggi University Hospital of Florence, Viale Morgagni, 85, Florence, Italy.
| | - F Salomone
- Department of Preclinical Pharmacology, R&D, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jeon GW. Surfactant preparations for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: past, present, and future. Korean J Pediatr 2019; 62:155-161. [PMID: 30744318 PMCID: PMC6528062 DOI: 10.3345/kjp.2018.07185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2018] [Accepted: 02/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Following the first successful trial of surfactant replacement therapy for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) by Fujiwara in 1980, several animal-derived natural surfactants and synthetic surfactants have been developed. Synthetic surfactants were designed to overcome limitations of natural surfactants such as cost, immune reactions, and infections elicited by animal proteins contained in natural surfactants. However, first-generation synthetic surfactants that are protein-free have failed to prove their superiority over natural surfactants because they lack surfactant protein (SP). Lucinactant, a second-generation synthetic surfactant containing the SP-B analog, was better or at least as effective as the natural surfactant, suggesting that lucinactant could act an alternative to natural surfactants. Lucinactant was approved by the U. S. Food and Drug Administration in March 2012 as the fifth surfactant to treat neonatal RDS. CHF5633, a second-generation synthetic surfactant containing SP-B and SP-C analogs, was effective and safe in a human multicenter cohort study for preterm infants. Many comparative studies of natural surfactants used worldwide have reported different efficacies for different preparations. However, these differences are believed to due to site variations, not actual differences. The more important thing than the composition of the surfactant in improving outcome is the timing and mode of administration of the surfactant. Novel synthetic surfactants containing synthetic phospholipid incorporated with SP-B and SP-C analogs will potentially represent alternatives to natural surfactants in the future, while improvement of treatment modalities with less-invasive or noninvasive methods of surfactant administration will be the most important task to be resolved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ga Won Jeon
- Department of Pediatrics, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Najafian B, Karimi-Sari H, Khosravi MH, Nikjoo N, Amin S, Shohrati M. Comparison of efficacy and safety of two available natural surfactants in Iran, Curosurf and Survanta in treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: A randomized clinical trial. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2016; 3:55-9. [PMID: 29736457 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2015] [Revised: 02/25/2016] [Accepted: 04/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The benefit of surfactant prescription for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) has been approved. Curosurf and Survanta are two commonly used natural surfactants in Iran. Previous studies did not report priority for one of these two drugs. The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of Curosurf and Survanta in treatment of RDS. Methods In this randomized clinical trial, neonates were born with RDS diagnosis in two governmental and referral hospitals of Tehran (the capital of Iran) in 2014 were randomly selected. Neonates were randomly assigned into two groups receiving 100 mg/kg Curosurf or Survanta as soon as possible after randomization. Complications, mortality and needing the second dose were compared between the two groups. Results A total 112 patients with the mean gestational age of 32.59 ± 3.39 weeks were evaluated (56 patients in each group). There were no significant differences regarding birth weight, gestational age, delivery method, and parity between the two groups (P > 0.05). The complications were occurred in 18 neonates (32.1%) of Curosurf group and 20 neonates (35.7%) of Survanta group (RR = 0.922, 95% CI = 0.617–1.379). There were no significant differences regarding complications, mortality, and needing nasal CPAP and endotracheal tube between the two groups. In the neonates with gestational age of 29–32 weeks the IVH and NEC incidence were significantly more in Curosurf group compared to Survanta group (27.8% vs 0% and 22.3% vs 0%, P < 0.05). Conclusion There was no significant difference in complications or mortality between those two groups; however Curosurf was associated with less need of ET tube (in >32 birth weeks subgroup) and NCPAP (in 29–32 birth weeks subgroup) (p = 0.008). Further evaluations with longer follow-up duration are needed for comparing these two surfactants.
Collapse
|