Safety and Efficacy of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt for Non-tumoral Cirrhotic Portal Vein Thrombosis Not Responding to Anticoagulation Therapy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of add-on transjugular-intrahepatic-portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for portal vein recanalization (PVR) in cirrhotic patients with non-tumoral chronic portal vein thrombosis (PVT) after 6 months of monitored anticoagulation therapy (ACT).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective search of the hospital database for patients who underwent TIPS for persistent PVT despite 6 months of ACT (January 2011 to August 2021). These patients were compared to control group (ACT group; no TIPS but continued on ACT). Post-TIPS periodic assessment was done to look for clinical outcome, PVR (using contrast-enhanced CT scan), and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 90 patients were analyzed. Thirty-six patients in TIPS group and 54 patients in ACT group. TIPS was successfully performed in all patients. TIPS group showed complete recanalization of portal vein in 77.8%, partial recanalization in 16.7%, and stable thrombus in 5.5% of the patients. TIPS thrombosis was seen in 3 patients, all underwent successful endovascular thrombolysis. Seven patients developed post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy and were managed conservatively. In contrast, no patient in ACT group achieved PVR on 12-month follow-up. After propensity score matching, patients in TIPS group showed significantly lower incidence of variceal re-bleeding (22.2% vs. 77.8%, p = 0.03) and refractory ascites (11.1% vs. 51.9%, p < 0.01) with significantly better 12-month survival as compared to ACT group (88.9% vs. 69.4%, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

TIPS in cirrhotic patients with PVT result in superior recanalization rates, better control of ascites, and variceal re-bleeding resulting in better survival. TIPS may be considered a preferred therapy after anticoagulation failure.

CLINICAL IMPACT

TIPS is associated with good technical and clinical success in patients of cirrhosis with PVT and should be considered in patients not responding to ACT.

Liver Growth and Portal Hypertension Improvement After Percutaneous Recanalization of Chronic Portal Vein Thrombosis in Non-Cirrhotic Participants

PURPOSE

To evaluate liver function improvement and volume gain after percutaneous recanalization of chronic portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in non-cirrhotic patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, five non-cirrhotic participants between 21 and 67 years old with secondary chronic PVT (4-21 years from diagnose) were submitted to percutaneous portal vein recanalization, followed by varices and shunts embolization.

RESULTS

After a mean of 12.6 months, all portal veins remained patent and there was complete resolution of portal hypertension (PH) symptoms in all participants. There was a significant increase in liver volume of 39.8 ± 19.0% (p = 0.042), platelets count of 53120 ± 20188/μl (p = 0.042), and a significant decrease in total bilirubin levels from 1.04 ± 0.23 mg/dL to 0.51 ± 0.09 mg/dL (p = 0.043). We also found a non-significant increase in albumin levels from 3.88 ± 0.39 g/dL to 4.38 ± 0.27 g/dL (p = 0.078) and decrease in spleen diameter from 16.88 ± 4.03 cm to 14.15 ± 2.72 cm (p = 0.068).

DISCUSSION

In this retrospective study, even with a small number of participants, we were capable of showing a median of 39.8% increase in liver volume, laboratorial liver function improvement, platelets count and resolution of PH symptoms, including gastroesophageal varices disappearance after portal vein recanalization followed by shunt embolization.

CONCLUSION

In this small series of cases, recanalization of chronic PVT in non-cirrhotic participants was feasible, successful and safe despite the prolonged time of occlusion. This is a new and promising approaching to an old and still challenging disease.

Transsplenic portal vein recanalization and direct intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement to optimize liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous trans-splenic portal vein recanalization (PVR) has been reported for facilitation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS), however has not been applied to patients undergoing direct intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (DIPS). We report the utilization of trans-splenic-PVR with DIPS creation in a patient with chronic portal and hepatic vein occlusions undergoing liver transplantation evaluation.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 48-year-old male with decompensated alcoholic cirrhosis complicated by refractory ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, and variceal bleeding underwent CT that demonstrated chronic occlusion of the hepatic veins (HV), extrahepatic portal vein (PV), and superior mesenteric vein (SMV). Due to failed attempts at TIPS at outside institutions, interventional radiology was consulted for portal vein recanalization (PVR) with TIPS to treat the portal hypertension and ascites and also facilitate an end-to-end PV anastomosis at transplantation. After an initial hepatic venogram confirmed chronic HV occlusion, a DIPS with trans-splenic PVR was planned. The splenic vein was accessed under sonographic guidance using a micropuncture set and subsequently upsized to a 6 French sheath over a stiff guidewire. A splenic venogram via this access confirmed occlusion of the PV with drainage of the splenic vein (SV) through gastric varices. The thrombosed PV was then recanalized and angioplastied to restore PV flow via the transsplenic approach. A transjugular liver access kit with a modified 21-gauge needle was advanced into the IVC through the internal jugular vein (IJV) sheath and directed towards the target snare in PV. The needle was used to subsequently puncture the PV through the caudate lobe and facilitate placement of a wire into the SV. The initial portosystemic gradient (PSG) was 20 mmHg. The IJV sheath was advanced through the hepatic parenchymal tract into the main-PV and a stent-graft was placed across the main PV and into the IVC. A portal venogram demonstrated brisk blood flow through the DIPS, resolution of varices and a PSG of 8 mmHg. One month after the procedure, the patient had a significant reduction in ascites and MELD-NA score. Patient is currently listed and awaiting transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of chronically occluded portal and hepatic veins, trans-splenic PVR DIPS may serve as an effective bridge to liver transplantation by facilitating an end to end portal vein anastomosis.