Postoperative nutrition in the setting of enhanced recovery programmes

Patients undergoing major surgery for gastrointestinal cancer are at high risk of developing or worsening malnutrition and sarcopenia. In malnourished patients, preoperative nutritional support may not be sufficient and so postoperative support is advised. This narrative review addresses several aspects of postoperative nutritional care in the setting of enhanced recovery programmes. Early oral feeding, therapeutic diet, oral nutritional supplements, immunonutrition, and probiotics are discussed. When postoperative intake is insufficient, nutritional support favouring the enteral route is recommended. Whether this approach should use a nasojejunal tube or jejunostomy is still a matter of debate. In the setting of enhanced recovery programmes with early discharge, nutritional follow-up and care should be continued beyond the short time in hospital. In enhanced recovery programmes, the main specific aspects of nutrition are patient education, early oral intake, and post-discharge care. The other aspects do not differ from conventional care.

Nutritional Optimization for Post-Spinal Surgery Recovery

Adequate nutritional intake is a key component of uncomplicated recovery from spinal surgery. Though much in the literature exists regarding its importance, specific dietary regimens for spinal surgery remain understudied, and little is available in compiling both preoperative and postoperative nutritional recommendations for patients. The complexity that may exist with these recommendations -- especially in the context of patients with diabetes or those who use substances -- has led in recent years to the development of protocols such as Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS), which gives providers a guideline upon which to base their nutritional counselling. More innovative regimens, such as the use of bioelectrical impedance analyses to assess nutritional status, have also emerged, resulting in a vast array of dietary recommendations and protocols for spinal surgery. In the following paper, we aim to compile a few of these guidelines, comparing various preoperative and postoperative nutritional strategies as well as making note of special considerations, like patients with diabetes or those who use substances. We also work to overview several such dietary "protocols" available in the literature, with a special focus on ERAS and more recent regimens like the Northwestern High-Risk Spine Protocol. We briefly mentioned preclinical work on novel nutritional recommendations as well. Ultimately, we hope to highlight the importance of nutrition in spinal surgery and address the need for greater cohesion of dietary strategies already in existence.

Postoperative Nutrition Management: Who Needs What?

Background

Early oral feeding after major abdominal surgery has been clearly shown to be safe and not a risk factor for anastomotic dehiscence. Within the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery protocol, it is the nutritional plan A. Nonetheless, one must consider that postoperative protein and energy requirements will often be not covered by oral food intake alone. Because nutritional status has been shown to be a prognostic factor in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, the preoperative identification of patients at risk may be mandatory. Malnutrition may be underestimated in an overweight society. With special regard to patients with cancer and those with preexisting malnutrition, an accumulating caloric gap may be harmful in the early and late postoperative periods. Furthermore, complications requiring reoperation and intensive care treatment may occur.

Summary

Therefore, a plan B for postoperative nutrition therapy is needed, using preferentially the enteral route. The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism recently addressed perioperative nutritional management and the indications for enteral and even parenteral supplementation to achieve caloric requirements in the postoperative course. In the first months after surgery, persisting weight loss is common in patients with upper gastrointestinal resections, even in those with an uncomplicated course. This may delay the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy, increase toxicity, and worsen long-term outcomes.

The negative association between skeletal muscle and fat mass wasting caused by oesophagectomy in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

This prospective observational study aimed to investigate postoperative skeletal muscle and fat mass wasting and their clinical significance in oesophageal cancer patients undergoing minimally invasive McKeown oesophagectomy.

METHODS

Bioelectrical impedance analyses of body compositions were conducted before surgery and 1, 4 and 12 weeks after surgery. Curve-fitting analysis was used to describe the relationship between changes in the skeletal muscle mass index (ΔSMI) and fat mass index (ΔFMI). A logistic regression-based nomogram was established using the R tool.

RESULTS

Among the 78 patients, 74.4% were male, and the mean age was 64.8 [standard deviation (SD): 6.6] years. Decreased SMIs and FMIs were concentrated in the first 4 weeks after surgery, with proportions of -3.42% (SD: 4.58) and -17.7% (SD: 11.9), respectively. A negative relationship between ΔFMI and ΔSMI was detected by linear regression (coefficient -0.341, P < 0.001). Based on the median ΔSMI to ΔFMI ratio (35.5%), 2 postoperative weight loss types were defined: SMI-dominated (SMDT) and FMI-dominated (FMDT) types. SMDT patients reported increased feeding-related problems, poorer functional status and more unhealthy symptoms than FMDT patients within 12 weeks after surgery. SMDT patients also showed poorer 2-year overall survival (71.1% vs 87.3%, P = 0.021) and disease-free survival (60.5% vs 84.9%, P = 0.032) than FMDT patients. A nomogram based on baseline and perioperative parameters was established to quantify postoperative SMDT and FMDT tendencies with good accuracy (C-index: 0.897).

CONCLUSIONS

The negative relationship between ΔFMI and ΔSMI indicated differentiated metabolism post-oesophagectomy. SMDT was associated with adverse therapeutic outcomes and warranted aggressive interventions.

CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The study protocol was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry with the registration number ChiCTR1800018511.

Early oral protein-containing diets following elective lower gastrointestinal tract surgery in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Background

Although current guidelines make consensus recommendations for the early resumption of oral intake after surgery, a recent comprehensive meta-analysis failed to identify any patient-centered benefits. We hypothesized this finding was attributable to pooling studies providing effective protein-containing diets with ineffective non-protein liquid diets. Therefore, the aim of this paper was to investigate the safety and efficacy of early oral protein-containing diets versus later (traditional) feeding after elective lower gastrointestinal tract surgery in adults.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched from inception until 1 August 2019. Reference lists of retrieved studies were hand searched to identify randomized clinical trials reporting mortality. No language restrictions were applied. Study selection, risk of bias appraisal and data abstraction were undertaken independently by two authors. Disagreements were settled by obtaining an opinion of a third author. Majority decisions prevailed. After assessment of underlying assumptions, a fixed-effects method was used for analysis. The primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes included surgical site infections, postoperative nausea and vomiting, serious postoperative complications and other key measures of safety and efficacy.

Results

Eight randomized clinical trials recruiting 657 patients were included. Compared with later (traditional) feeding, commencing an early oral protein-containing diet resulted in a statistically significant reduction in mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.31, P = 0.02, I² = 0%). An early oral protein-containing diet also significantly reduced surgical site infections (OR 0.39, P = 0.002, I² = 32%), postoperative nausea and vomiting (OR 0.62, P = 0.04, I² = 37%), serious postoperative complications (OR 0.60, P = 0.01, I² = 25%), and significantly improved other major outcomes. No harms attributable to an early oral protein-containing diet were identified.

Conclusions

The results of this systematic review can be used to upgrade current guideline statements to a grade A recommendation supporting an oral protein-containing diet commenced before the end of postoperative day 1 after elective lower gastrointestinal surgery in adults.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13741-021-00179-3.

Preoperative nutrition forseverely malnourished patients in digestive surgery: A retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Malnutrition increases postoperative morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to evaluate preoperative refeeding in malnourished patients at risk of refeeding syndrome (RS).

METHODOLOGY

A retrospective study, conducted between June 2016 and January 2017, reported to the CNIL, compared two groups of malnourished patients: a group of refeeding patients (RP) and a group of non-refeeding patients (NRP). The inclusion criteria were weight loss of more than 10% or albuminemia less than 35g/L and RS risk factor. The primary endpoint was postoperative morbidity. The secondary endpoints were weight change and serum albumin over 6 months.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients (30 RP and 43 NRP) were included. At the time of initial management, median weight loss was 18% [1-71], while albuminemia was 26g/L [13-40] in the RP group and 32.5g/L [32-48] in the NRP group (P=0.01). The overall postoperative morbidity rate was 88% (83% RP versus 90% NRP, P=0.47), and there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. The rate of anastomotic complications was 4% for RP versus 26% for NRP (P=0.03) after exclusion of liver surgery. Medium-term weight loss tended to be greater in RP (P=0.7). Nutritional support was continued until the third postoperative month in 13% of RPs vs. no NRPs (P=0.0002).

CONCLUSION

After preoperative renutrition, we did not observe a decrease in morbidity but rather a decrease in the rate of anastomotic complications in favor of the RP group. This study underscores the middle-term importance of nutritional management in view of preserving the benefits of preoperative renutrition.

Program of gastrointestinal rehabilitation and early postoperative enteral nutrition: a prospective study

Nutritional depletion is commonly observed in patients undergoing surgical treatment for a gastrointestinal malignancy. An appropriate nutritional intervention could be associated with improved postoperative outcomes. The study was aimed to determine the effect of a program of gastrointestinal rehabilitation and early postoperative enteral nutrition upon complications and clinical outcomes in patients who experienced gastrointestinal surgery for cancer. This is a prospective study (2013 January-2015 December) of 465 consecutive patients submitted to gastrointestinal surgery for cancer and admitted to an Oncological Intensive Care Unit. The program of gastrointestinal rehabilitation and early postoperative enteral nutrition consisted on: (1) general rules: pain relive, early mobilization, antibiotic prophylaxis, deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis and respiratory physiotherapy; and (2) gastrointestinal rules: gastric protection, control of postoperative nausea and vomiting, early nasogastric tube remove and early enteral nutrition. The most frequent surgical sites were colorectal (44.9%), gynecological with intestinal suturing (15.7%) and esophagus/stomach (11.0%). Emergency surgery was performed in 12.7% of patients. The program of intestinal rehabilitation and early postoperative enteral nutrition reduced major complications (19.2 vs. 10.2%; p = 0.030), respiratory complications (p = 0.040), delirium (p = 0.032), infectious complications (p = 0.047) and gastrointestinal complications (p < 0.001). Intensive care unit mortality (p = 0.018), length of intensive care unit stay (p < 0.001) and length of hospitalization (p < 0.001) were reduced as well. A program of gastrointestinal rehabilitation and early postoperative enteral nutrition is associated with reduced postoperative complications and improved clinical outcomes in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery for cancer.

Clinical effects of early enteral nutrition support with peptison in patients with severe acute pancreatitis

AIM

To investigate the influence of early enteral nutrition support with peptison on postoperative nutrition, immune function, and intestinal mucosal barrier function in patients with severe acute pancreatitis.

METHODS

One hundred and twelve patients with severe acute pancreatitis treated from October 2012 to October 2015 were randomly divided into two groups: 56 patients receiving parenteral nutrition support as a control group and 56 patients receiving early enteral nutrition support with peptison as an observation group. Postoperative nutrition status, changes in immune function and intestinal mucosal barrier function, gastrointestinal function recovery, and complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

After nutritional support, total protein, albumin, pre-albumin, transferrin, CD4⁺ T cells, CD4⁺/CD8⁺ ratio, IgM, and IgG in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Calcitonin, D-lactic acid, blood amylase, blood lipase, and complication rate in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Time to bowel sound recovery, time to first anal exhaust, time to defecation, time to food intake, and hospitalization time in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Early enteral nutrition support with peptison is helpful to improve postoperative nutrition status in patients with severe acute pancreatitis, and it can enhance immune function and intestinal mucosa barrier function, shorten the recovery time of gastrointestinal function and has higher safety.

Can Postoperative Nutrition be Favourably Maintained by Oral Diet in Patients with Emergency Temporary Ileostomy? A Tertiary Hospital Based Study

INTRODUCTION

Temporary ileostomy is an emergency procedure performed in cases having septic peritonitis in presence of perforation or obstruction or gangrene of small intestine. These patients usually suffer from gross malnutrition following surgery.

AIM

To measure nutritional status of patients with emergency temporary ileostomy and to determine whether their postoperative nutrition can be favourably maintained by oral diet alone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty patients were enrolled for the study on the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria during the study period from January 2012 to December 2013. Oral feeding was started as soon as ileostomy started functioning and patients expressed hunger, about 48-72 hours postoperatively. An individualized diet chart was formulated for each patient using Harris Benedict Equation. Nutritional assessment was done on 1) 1(st) day of oral feeding, 2) After 7 days of oral feeding, 3). After three months of oral feeding. Nutritional parameters (anthropometric, biochemical) employed were tabulated and statistically analysed with SPSS v 17, Chicago.

RESULTS

Out of 60 patients, 36 males and 24 females were enrolled in the study. The patients were in the age group of 20-60 years with a mean age of 45 years. After 7 days of oral nutrition the nutritional status deteriorated with a significant decrease in body weight (p<0.001) and serum haemoglobin (p <0.001). However, at the end of the study, the patients had their nutritional status restored satisfactorily with normalization of basic parameters like bodyweight, haemoglobin and serum albumin (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Proper dietary advice and oral nutrition were found to be sufficient for gradual restoration and maintenance of satisfactory nutritional status in the postoperative period.