Reducing aneurysm sac growth and secondary interventions following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair by preemptive coil embolization of the inferior mesenteric artery and lumbar arteries

OBJECTIVE

Type II endoleak (EL-2) is the most common complication following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), leading to continued sac growth and potential rupture. In this study, we examined the association between patency of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and lumbar arteries (LAs) with respect to sac growth. The effect of preemptive embolization of the IMA and/or LAs on the need for secondary interventions for sac growth post-EVAR was also evaluated.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed on consecutive patients who underwent EVAR for non-ruptured, infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) from January 2012 to December 2020. A select group of patients underwent preemptive embolization of the IMA and/or LA. Patients with any types I, III, or IV endoleaks were excluded. Patency of the IMA and LA on preoperative computed tomography angiogram (CTA) was evaluated on TeraRecon workstation. All secondary interventions to treat EL-2 were recorded. Sac growth was defined as centerline axial diameter increase of ≥5 mm on follow-up CTA.

RESULTS

A total of 300 patients (mean age, 74 ± 8.5 years; 83.7% male) underwent EVAR. Ninety-nine patients had preemptive embolization of the IMA and/or LA. Mean follow-up of the cohort was 59.3 ± 30.5 months. Thirty-six patients (12%) demonstrated sac growth on follow-up; 12 of these (33.3%) had preemptive embolization. The median time until detection of sac growth was 28.8 months (interquartile range, 15.2-46.5 months), with a mean growth of 10.1 ± 6.4 mm. Sac growth was significantly associated with presence of EL-2: 27 of 36 (75%) with EL-2 vs 9 of 36 (25%) without EL-2 (P < .001). Patients with sac growth had a higher mean total number (2.6 ± 1.5) of patent lower LAs (L3, L4) compared with those without (2.0 ± 1.4; P = .03). Patency of L1, L2, and L3 LAs were not associated with sac growth. However, patency of at least one L4 LA was significantly associated with sac growth (14.8% vs 7.7%; P = .04). The highest incidence of sac growth (17.6%) was seen when both IMA and L4 LA were patent; significantly different from the lowest incidence (5.3%) when both were occluded preoperatively (P = .018). Preemptive coiling of the IMA and/or LA significantly reduced the need for post-EVAR secondary intervention for sac growth. Freedom from post-EVAR secondary intervention was achieved in 92 of 99 (92.9%) pre-EVAR coiled patients vs 163 of 201 (81.5%) patients who did not undergo pre-EVAR coiling (P = .009).

CONCLUSIONS

Preemptive coil embolization of the IMA and LAs, especially L4 LA, reduces the need for secondary interventions for sac growth, potentially improving the long-term durability of EVAR.

Microneurosurgical Clip Ligation of Acutely Ruptured Cerebral Aneurysm Immediately Preceded by Intentional Subtotal Endovascular Coil Embolization Under a Single Anesthesia: Observations Using a Deliberate Combined Sequential Treatment Strategy in 13 Cases

BACKGROUND

Endovascular coil embolization and craniotomy with clip ligation are the 2 most commonly used treatments for ruptured cerebral aneurysm. Although coiling maintains the advantages of brevity and complete avoidance of brain retraction and manipulation, clipping offers the benefits of decompression of the injured brain and lower rates of aneurysm recurrence. A combined, immediately sequential treatment strategy for acutely ruptured cerebral aneurysm that simultaneously maximizes the advantages of both techniques, while minimizing their respective disadvantages, may be a useful paradigm.

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the complementarity of clipping and coiling in acutely ruptured cerebral aneurysm.

METHODS

Patients with ruptured anterior circulation cerebral aneurysm standing to benefit from brain decompression were treated by a combination of coiling and microneurosurgery in rapid succession, under the same general anesthetic. Surgery consisted of clipping of the aneurysm via either craniotomy or craniectomy with expansion duraplasty in all cases, and ventriculostomy in selected cases.

RESULTS

Coil embolization of the ruptured aneurysm was carried out rapidly and improved the efficiency of subsequent clipping by allowing early unequivocal identification of the aneurysm dome and decreased brain retraction, reducing risk of intraoperative rupture and obviating temporary occlusion. All aneurysms were shown eliminated by postoperative cerebral angiography.

CONCLUSIONS

A deliberate combined treatment strategy that uses clipping immediately preceded by subtotal coiling under a single anesthetic may be ideal for selected ruptured cerebral aneurysms, takes advantage of the unique strengths of both techniques, makes both techniques easier, and maximizes opportunity for brain protection against delayed complications in the prolonged aftermath of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.