Radiographic and clinical comparisons between loose-fit and press-fit stems in monopolar radial head arthroplasty for comminuted radial head fractures

PURPOSE

Few clinical studies have compared the operative outcomes between loose- and press-fit stems in radial head arthroplasty (RHA). We aimed to evaluate the radiographic and clinical results of the two radial head implant concepts.

METHODS

In this retrospective multicenter study, 32 patients (24 women and 8 men) with a mean age of 63.1 years who underwent RHA for comminuted radial head fractures were reviewed between 2005 and 2021. Seventeen patients underwent RHA with a loose-fit stem (L-group), whereas the remaining fifteen patients underwent RHA with a press-fit stem (P-group). The mean follow-up period was 40.1 ± 9.9 months, with the minimum follow-up duration of 12 months. The radiographic findings were evaluated for periprosthetic osteolysis; furthermore, clinical outcomes were analyzed to measure the range of motion of the elbow. The rate of reoperations and prosthesis removal were also reviewed.

RESULTS

The general characteristics of the patients were similar in the two groups. The rate of periprosthetic osteolysis was 17.6% in the L-group, whereas it was 53.3% in the P-group. The mean elbow flexions were 128° and 133° in the L- and P-groups, respectively. The mean elbow extensions were -12° and -9° in the L- and P-groups, respectively. The rate of reoperation was 23.5% in the L-group and 15.2% in the P-group. One patient in the L-group had the prosthesis removed because of surgical site infection, whereas one patient in the P-group had the prosthesis removed owing to painful loosening.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences in the clinical outcomes and reoperation rate were observed between the two radial head implant concepts in this study. However, osteolysis occurred more frequently in the P-group. Although patients with periprosthetic osteolysis are currently asymptomatic, they should be carefully followed up for the symptoms in the long term.

Outcomes of fixation of Vancouver B periprosthetic fractures around cemented versus uncemented stems

BACKGROUND

The incidence of periprosthetic femur fracture (PPFF) in the setting of total hip arthroplasty (THA) is steadily increasing. We seek to address whether there is a difference in outcomes between Vancouver B fracture types managed with ORIF when the original stem was a press-fit stem versus a cemented stem.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study at a level 1 trauma center, we identified 136 patients over 65 years-of-age with Vancouver B-type fractures sustained between 2005 and 2019. Patients were treated by ORIF and had either cemented or press-fit stems prior to their injury. Outcomes were subsidence of the femoral implant, time to full weight bearing, rate of the hip implant revision, estimated blood loss (EBL), postoperative complications, and the one-year mortality rate.

RESULTS

A total of 103 (75.7%) press-fit and 33 (24.3%) cemented patients were reviewed. Patient baseline characteristics, Vancouver fracture sub-types, and implant characteristics were not found to be significantly different between groups. The difference in subsidence rates, postoperative complications, and time to weight bearing were not significantly different between groups. EBL and one-year mortality rate were significantly higher in the cemented group.

CONCLUSIONS

In geriatric patients with Vancouver B type periprosthetic fractures managed with ORIF, patients with an originally press fit stem may have lower mortality, lower estimated blood loss, and similar subsidence and hospital length of stays when compared to those with a cemented stem.

Personalizing Revision Tibial Baseplate Position and Stem Trajectory With Custom Implants Using 3D Modeling to Optimize Press-fit Stem Placement

Background

A common tibial construct for revision total knee arthroplasty includes a long diaphyseal engaging press-fit stem. Due to tibial canal bowing, compromises are often necessary to match patient anatomy when choosing stemmed implants. The objective of this study is to determine through 3-D modeling whether current implant press-fit options appropriately fit patient anatomy, or whether an alternative angle between the stem and baseplate could increase the cortical engagement of long press-fit tibial stems.

Methods

Preoperative computerized tomography scans from 100 patients undergoing TKA were imported into an image-processing software program. Three-dimensional models were created with tibial stems placed at a fixed perpendicular angle and a custom angle to the revision tibial baseplate. Stem diameter, depth, offset, and contact surface area were measured and analyzed between the 2 groups.

Results

Significantly more cortical contact, larger stem diameter, and smaller offset of the custom keel from the center of the baseplate were associated with free custom tibial stem placement vs a fixed perpendicular baseplate-stem interface (P < .001). Statistically significant differences were also found between different patient demographics.

Conclusions

Custom free-angle stem placement allows for increased stem diameter and cortical contact of press-fit tibial stems compared to existing constructs that must interface with the baseplate at a 90-degree angle. Current revision tibia implants limit fixation of tibial press-fit stems and often mismatch with patient anatomy. Alternative ways to fit patient anatomy may be beneficial for patients with extreme mismatch. In the future, custom keel angles may help to resolve this problem.

Cementless revision femoral stems application of press-fit principles and clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Cementless femoral stems are currently used in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the surgeon choosing between various fixation modes. The outcomes are good in the medium term; however, some failures have been attributed to technical errors during implantation. When the decision has been made to use a press-fit implant, the impact of the surgeon's technique on the functional outcomes have not been explored in-depth. This led us to carry out a retrospective study on a large population of total hip arthroplasty patients which aims were achieved press-fit to (1) determine the impact of the type of primary fixation (with and without press-fit) on the functional outcomes; (2) specify the effect of stem length on the functional scores when diaphyseal press-fit is achieved and (3) analyse the main reasons why a true press-fit effect was not achieved (three-point fixation).

HYPOTHESIS

There is a relationship between the primary fixation method by press-fit of a revision femoral stem and the functional outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of a continuous cohort of 244 THA revision cases with a mean follow-up of 6.1 ± 3.5 years (range, 2-18). The femoral area in which close contact was achieved (shared interface between the bone and implant) was used to define various types of press-fit fixation. The functional outcomes were determined using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Merle d'AubignéPostel score (MAP score) out of 12 points (pain and walking items).

RESULTS

The post-operative HHS averaged 90.83 ± 7.51 for proximal press-fit and 80.14 ± 14.93 with no press-fit (p = 0.01). The MAP averaged 10.83 ± 1.03 for proximal press-fit and 9.75 ± 2.09 with no press-fit (p = 0.09). The MAP score was worse for long diaphyseal press-fit than for short press-fit (p = 0.02). Use of a long stem with an endofemoral route or an overly small femoral window in patients with a curved femur is the main reason that three-point fixation occurred instead of press-fit.

CONCLUSIONS

While press-fit is an effective concept, it is a demanding one that requires the surgeon to choose the correct surgical strategy for the patient's anatomy. A meticulous surgical technique is required to achieve proximal press-fit or at a minimum, short diaphyseal press-fit.

Anatomic humeral head replacement with a press-fit prosthesis: An in vivo radiographic study

Successful total shoulder arthroplasty is, in part, dependent on anatomic reconstruction of the glenohumeral joint. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the post-operative anatomy of total shoulder arthroplasty with an anatomic implant design in patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis and compare it to published normative anatomic measurements. Fifty-one patients (56 shoulders) with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis were treated with a press-fit humeral component as part of a total shoulder arthroplasty (Aequalis, Tornier, Edina, Minnesota). Analysis of postoperative true anterior posterior radiographs was performed with use of a custom software algorithm. The mean humeral inclination (head-shaft angle), mean humeral implant anatomical humeral axis, mean greater tuberosity height, and mean humeral head center offset (medial offset) were 135.4±5.1°, 1.73±1.7°, 6.9±2.4 mm, and 3.8±1.8 mm, respectively. All parameters were within the ranges reported in the literature for normal shoulders except the mean humeral head center offset, which was less than reported in the literature. Anatomic parameters of a total shoulder arthroplasty can be achieved with an anatomically designed, modular adaptable press-fit design. Reduced medial humeral head center offset was likely dependent upon implant specific design parameters.

Comparative assessment of different reconstructive techniques of distal femur in revision total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Bone loss is often encountered in revision total knee arthroplasty. In particular, when the cortex of distal femur is breached, the surgical decision on the reconstructive options to be taken is challenging due to the variety of defects and the lack of data from clinical or experimental studies that can support it. The aim of the present work was to test the hypothesis that for an identical defect and bone condition, each reconstructive technique option has a dissimilar stress and stability behaviour, which may be related to differing longevity of the revision procedure.

METHODS

Triaxial strain gauges and video extensometer were used to measure distal cortex strains and implant stability in eight reconstructive techniques replicated with synthetic femur under a load of 2030N. To assess the cancellous bone strains, finite element models were developed and validated.

RESULTS

The measured strains showed that the distal cortex is not immune to the different reconstructive techniques, when applied to an identical defect; however, significant differences (P < 0.05) were found only between bone graft and metal augment on the 12-mm larger distal defect. The stem addition improves the stability of all reconstructive techniques; however, significant differences (P = 0.03) were found only on the bone-graft technique.

CONCLUSIONS

Cement-fill and metal-augment techniques, applied to the 4-mm smaller defect, are not associated with different structural behaviour, while for the 12-mm larger defect, the metal-augment and bone-graft techniques presented distinct biomechanical effects. These effects, by themselves, may not be sufficient to be associated with a different longevity of the revision procedure among techniques, when the stem is added to the bone-graft technique. These findings, based on independent scientific understanding and advanced prediction tools, can improve the surgical decision-making process, when the peripheral cortex of the distal femur is breached.