Revision for Solid-Body Breakage of the 3D-Printed Implant Following Joint-Sparing Surgery: A Technical Note

BACKGROUND

The advent of three-dimensional (3D)-printed custom-made implants has revolutionized orthopaedic surgery, particularly in limb- and joint-sparing surgeries. However, clinical experience in the revision for 3D-printed implant breakage is lacking, and the revision surgery remains challenging. This study reported the revision of proximal tibial prosthetic reconstruction necessitated by solid-body breakage of a 3D-printed implant, aiming to detail the surgical techniques and evaluate postoperative outcomes.

CASE PRESENTATION

A patient diagnosed with osteosarcoma underwent joint-sparing surgery with a 3D-printed implant, but implant breakage occurred during subsequent follow-up. The initial implant was broken into two parts: the proximal implant breakage part (IBP) integrated with the host bone and the distal IBP left in the prosthetic component. Four revision protocols were devised, each based on one of the four hypothesis results of taking out the initial implant. A new custom-made implant and a series of assistance devices ("positioning devices," "drill devices," "tap devices," and "separator devices") were specifically prepared for revision surgery. The proximal IBP was taken out from the host bone, but the distal IBP was not taken out from the initial prosthetic component. The patient received the new custom-made implant for reconstruction, with the knee joint preserved. The patient recovered uneventfully after revision surgery and achieved satisfactory function. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society was 28 at the last follow-up. No complications were detected during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Comprehensive preoperative planning and preparation, enabling the surgeon to effectively address intraoperative challenges, are crucial for the successful revision of 3D-printed implant breakage. It is feasible to re-implant a 3D-printed custom-made implant, demonstrating satisfactory clinical and functional results.

The Assessment of Skeletal Muscle and Cortical Bone by Second-generation HR-pQCT at the Tibial Midshaft

BACKGROUND

Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) is the current densitometric gold-standard for assessing skeletal muscle at the 66% proximal tibia site. High resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) is a leading technology for quantifying bone microarchitecture at the distal extremities, and with the second-generation HR-pQCT it is possible to measure proximal limb sites. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to: (1) assess the feasibility of using HR-pQCT to assess skeletal muscle parameters at the 66% proximal tibia site, and (2) test HR-pQCT skeletal muscle measurement reproducibility at this site.

METHODS

Adult participants (9 males; 7 females; ages 31-75) received 1 pQCT scan and 2 HR-pQCT scans at the 66% proximal site of the nondominant tibia. Participants were repositioned between HR-pQCT scans to test reproducibility. HR-pQCT and pQCT scans were analyzed to quantify muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and muscle density. Coefficients of determination and Bland-Altman plots compared muscle parameters between pQCT and HR-pQCT. For short-term reproducibility, root-mean-square of coefficient of variance and least significant change were calculated.

RESULTS

HR-pQCT and pQCT measured muscle density and muscle CSA were positively correlated (R² = 0.66, R² = 0.95, p < 0.001, respectively). Muscle density was equivalent between HR-pQCT and pQCT; however, there was systematic and directional bias for muscle CSA, such that muscle CSA was 11% lower with HR-pQCT and bias increased with larger muscle CSA. Root-mean-square of coefficient of variance was 0.67% and 0.92% for HR-pQCT measured muscle density and muscle CSA, respectively, while least significant change was 1.4 mg/cm³ and 174.0 mm² for muscle density and muscle CSA, respectively.

CONCLUSION

HR-pQCT is capable of assessing skeletal muscle at the 66% site of the tibia with good precision. Measures of muscle density are comparable between HR-pQCT and pQCT.

Pin Leverage Technique: A Simple Percutaneous Technique for Elevation of Posterolateral Tibial Plateau Fractures

Depressed lateral tibial plateau fractures with a large central or posterior fragment can be seen in isolation or association with complex proximal tibia fractures. Conventionally elevation of the large depressed fragment is done by bone tamp through a medial metaphyseal window in isolated fractures, or the fractured window in associated complex fracture scenarios. Though various instruments have been devised for this purpose, reaching the posterior aspect of lateral condyle through the medial metaphyseal window is not always easy, considering the difficulty in aiming and trajectory. Excessive maneuvering can result in the widening of the medial metaphyseal window, leaves a large metaphyseal void, intraarticular penetration of elevating device, and comminution of the depressed fragment. Described herein is an alternate percutaneous technique for effective reduction of selected lateral tibial plateau depression fractures using Steinmann pin. Twenty- one patients with at least 1-year follow-up with successful outcomes have benefitted from this reduction technical tip thus far.