[Isolated biceps tenodesis by double row for pulley lesions]

Objective: To explore clinical outcome of isolated arthroscopic biceps tenodesis by double row for pulley lesions. Methods: Forty-nine patients with pulley lesions were treated from July 2017 to June 2018 in the Department of Sport Medicine, the Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University by isolated arthroscopic biceps tenodesis by double row. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the intraoperative damage of the pulley system. In group A, there were 16 patients with isolated superior glenohumeral ligament/coracohumeral ligament (SGHL/CHL) complex lesions, including 9 males and 7 females, aged (55±6) years. In group B, there were 33 patients (15 males and 18 females, aged (57±8) years) with SGHL/CHL complex and adjacent supraspinatus tendon and/or subscapularis tendon articular-side partly tears. Patients in two groups were treated with different isolated arthroscopic biceps tenodesis by double row. Constant-Murley shoulder score and pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score were assessed before operation and 3, 6, 12 months after the operation. Postoperative complications were also recorded in two groups. The t test was used to compare the quantitative data within and between two groups. Results: All 49 patients were followed up for 12 to 24 months with an average of (17±6) months. The first-stage healing was achieved in all incisions in the two groups. No surgical complications related to revision, infection, Popeye syndrome and cramping pain were observed in either group. There was 1 case treated by secondary arthroscopy for retrauma in group B. The Constant-Murley shoulder score in group A before the operation was 46±10, and it was increased to 89±9 at the 12 months post operation(t=-22.637, P<0.05); and it was 39±10 and 87±8 before and 12 months after the operation respectively in group B (t=-44.849, P<0.05). The VAS scores in the two groups were both decreased significantly at the 12 months post operation when compared with those before the operation (0.68±0.70 vs 5.25±0.27 and 0.72±0.83 vs 5.69±0.84, respectively) (t=29.007, 37.079, both P<0.05). Conclusion: Isolated arthroscopic biceps tenodesis by double row can relieve pain, recover functions of shoulder joint effectively, and achieve a satisfactory outcome in the treatment of pulley lesions.

[MR imaging of flexor tendon and pulley system of the fingers: normal anatomy and injury]

Objective: To explore the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of the anatomy and injuries of flexor tendon and pulley system of the fingers. Methods: Clinical and imaging data of 20 healthy volunteers without injuries and 36 patients from Beijing Jishuitan Hospital with flexor tendon and pulley system injuries in the fingers between March 2013 and March 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. All subjects underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination. The MRI findings of patients were compared with healthy volunteers. In addition, imaging findings of patients were compared with the surgical results and confirmed by double-blinded method. Results: Twenty volunteers without flexor tendon and pulley system injures showed homogeneous hypointensity on both T1-weighted and Proton Density-weighted images with fat saturation (PD-FS). There were 36 patients with finger injures, including 21 cases of flexor tendon injury, 10 cases of pulley system injury, 5 cases of compound injury, which demonstrated unclear signal, discontinuity on T1-weighted images and heterogeneously increased signal intensity of the involved structures on PD-FS images. Edema was detected in the soft tissues surrounding the injured sites. Conclusions: MRI is an accurate method for evaluation of the anatomy and pathologic conditions of flexor tendon and pulley system of the fingers and a useful tool for diagnosis and treatment of flexor tendon and pulley system injuries.

Flexor tendon injuries

Flexor tendon injuries have constituted a large portion of the literature in hand surgery over many years. Yet many controversies remain and the techniques of surgery and therapy are still evolving. The anatomical and finer technical considerations involved in treating these injuries have been put forth and discussed in detail including the rehabilitation following the flexor tendon repair. The authors consider, recognition and mastery of these facts form the foundation for a successful flexor tendon repair. The trend is now towards multiple strand core sutures followed by early active mobilization. However, the rehabilitation process appears to be one of the major determinant of the success following a flexor tendon repair. Early mobilization is essential for all the flexor tendon repairs as it is proved to improve the quality of the repaired tendon. The art of achieving the harmony between a stronger repair and unhindered gliding of the repair site through the narrow flexor tendon sheath simultaneously can be mastered with practice added to the knowledge of the basic principles.