[Poor results and complications in the use of focused shockwaves and radial pressure waves in musculoskeletal pathology]

The application of focused shockwaves and radial pressure waves in musculoskeletal pathology has had a great development in the last decade. Although most of the publications have highlighted their safety and efficacy, poor results and complications can occur. This review analyzes the main causes of its poor results, adverse effects, and complications, emphasizing their prevention.

[Current evidences in shockwave treatment. SETOC (Spanish Society of Shockwave Treatment) recommendations]

This SETOC consensus document shows the scientific evidence of the technology in shockwaves (SW) and radial pressure waves (RPW) in a variety of spasticity disorders, musculoskeletal, skin, urological diseases, etc. SW and RPW, without anesthesia, are an effective, safe, non-invasive, cost-effective treatment, which reduces the need for surgery, lower risk of complications, faster recovery and greater acceptability to patients than surgery. Consequently, SW and RPW should be the first therapeutic option in the aforementioned chronic pathologies, when conservative alternatives have failed. SETOC advises to follow the recommendations given in this article, including the ones given by SW scientific societies and best evidence for each technology as well.

Effect of Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Stimulation, Extracorporeal Shockwaves and Radial Pressure Waves on Akt, BMP-2, ERK-2, FAK and TGF-β1 During Bone Healing in Rat Tibial Defects

An experimental study was conducted to determine whether low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulation (LIPUS), extracorporeal shockwave treatment (ESWT) and radial pressure wave treatment (RPWT) modulate Akt, bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2), extracellular signal-regulated kinase-2 (ERK-2), focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) during bone healing in rat tibial defects. Rat tibial defects were exposed to 500 shots of ESWT delivered at 0.12 mJ/mm², 500 impulses of RPWT operated at 2.0 bar or to daily 20-min 30 mW/cm² LIPUS. Following 1, 3 and 6 wk, bones were harvested to determine the expression and activity of Akt, BMP-2, ERK-2, FAK and TGF-β1. Animals exposed to ultrasound were followed up to 3 wk. Protein expression and activity were unchanged following LIPUS treatment. ESWT increased Akt activity 2.11-fold (p = 0.043) and TGF-β1 expression 9.11-fold (p = 0.016) at 1 wk and increased FAK activity 2.16-fold (p = 0.047) at 3 wk. RPWT increased FAK activity 2.6-fold (p = 0.028) at 3 wk and decreased Akt expression 0.52-fold (p = 0.05) at 6 wk. In conclusion, the protocols employed for ESWT and RPWT modulated distinct signaling pathways during fracture healing, while LIPUS standard protocol did not change the usual signaling pathways of the proteins investigated. Future studies are required to monitor osteogenesis so that the biologic meaning of our results can be clarified.