Comparison of the effectiveness of thoracic epidural and rectus sheath catheter as analgesic modalities following laparotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Rectus sheath catheters are used as an analgesic alternative to thoracic epidural. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the analgesic effects and side effects of thoracic epidural and rectus sheath catheter in the setting of emergency or elective laparotomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of the Cochrane library, Embase, PubMed and Medline was conducted. Papers that directly compared thoracic epidurals and rectus sheath catheters following laparotomy were identified. Literature published between 2001 and 2021 were included. Data were extracted on the following postoperative outcomes: additional analgesic requirements, pain scores, hypotension and ambulation. A random effects meta-analysis model was used to compare additional opioid requirements between thoracic epidural and rectus sheath catheter.

RESULTS

Eight publications were included from five countries. This comprised 484 patients, with 120 patients being extracted from randomised trials. Thoracic epidural reduced the requirement for additional intravenous analgesia compared with rectus sheath catheters (p = 0.004). Despite this, both analgesic techniques were equivalent with regard to reported pain scores. Furthermore, rectus sheath catheters have a lower rate of postoperative hypotension and allow for earlier ambulation compared with thoracic epidural.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature suggests that rectus sheath catheters provide similar analgesic effect to thoracic epidurals, but rectus sheath catheters have a favourable side effect profile.

Surgical placement of rectus sheath catheters in a cadaveric cystectomy model

Introduction Surgically inserted rectus sheath catheters (RSCs) are used increasingly for analgesia after cystectomy and other abdominal surgery. Currently, there is little information on the optimal positioning of RSCs to allow maximal spread of local anaesthetic. This study sought to assess the spread of dye injected via RSCs and to highlight the extent of its coverage in a fresh unembalmed cadaveric cystectomy model in order to confirm the nerve endings that are likely to be anaesthetised with RSCs. Methods Four cadavers underwent lower midline incision with limited bladder mobilisation. A RSC was inserted into the eight hemiabdomens. The RSCs were positioned either anterior (n=5) or posterior to the rectus muscle (n=3). Dye was injected down the RSCs to evaluate spread. The eight hemiabdomens were dissected anatomically to determine the surface area of dye spread and nerve root involvement. Results The mean surface area of dye spread with anteriorly placed RSCs was 30.6cm² anterior and 25.9cm² posterior to the rectus muscle. The mean surface area of dye spread with posteriorly placed RSCs was 11.3cm² anterior and 37.3cm² posterior to the rectus muscle. The mean number of nerve roots stained with anteriorly and posteriorly placed RSCs was 3.8 and 2.7 respectively. Subcutaneous spread of dye was seen with one anterior RSC insertion. Peritoneal spread was seen with one anteriorly positioned RSC. Conclusions This study has demonstrated efficient nerve root infiltration with anteriorly and posteriorly positioned RSCs. It appears that dye spreads between the fibres of the rectus muscle rather than out laterally to the nerve roots when spreading from its initial compartment.

Rectus sheath catheters provide equivalent analgesia to epidurals following laparotomy for colorectal surgery

Introduction Rectus sheath catheters (RSCs) are increasingly being used to provide postoperative analgesia following laparotomy for colorectal surgery. Little is known about their efficacy in comparison with epidural infusion analgesia (EIA). They are potentially better as they avoid the recognised complications associated with EIA. This study compares these two methods of analgesia. Outcomes include average pain scores, time to mobilisation and length of stay. Methods This was a 33-month single centre observational study including all patients undergoing elective open or laparoscopic-converted-to-open colorectal resection for both benign and malignant disease. Patients received either EIA or RSCs. Data were collected prospectively and analysed retrospectively. Results A total of 95 patients were identified. Indications for surgery, operation and complications were recorded. The mean time to mobilisation was significantly shorter in patients who had RSCs compared with EIA patients (2.4 vs 3.5 days, p<0.05). There was no difference in postoperative pain scores or length of stay. Conclusions RSCs provide equivalent analgesia to EIA and avoid the recognised potential complications of EIA. They are associated with a shorter time to mobilisation. Their use should be adopted more widely.