1
|
Bauquier C, Ginguené S, Leroy T, Doumergue M, Lebrun N, Della Vecchia C, Mabire-Yon R, Leveaux S, Sagaon-Teyssier L, Préau M. Measuring reconceptualization and reprioritization during France's first COVID-19-related lockdown in women with and without a history of cancer: an adaptation of the SeiQol-DW and PGI. Qual Life Res 2024; 33:1423-1431. [PMID: 38502415 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03626-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to provide a better understanding of the patient-perceived effects of France's first COVID-19-related lockdown on the quality of life (QoL) of women affected by cancer, and to test an ad hoc measurement scale for evaluating quasi-individualized QoL. QoL was measured for both during (i.e., current) and before (i.e., retrospectively) the lockdown. Respondents were women registered on the research platform Seintinelles. METHODS A tool for measuring quasi-individualized QoL was adapted from the SeiQol-DW and PGI. It was distributed as part of a larger online self-questionnaire to a sample of 1303 women with a history of cancer (i.e., former or current) and with no such history. RESULTS Current and retrospective QoL scores were not significantly different between the two respondent groups. An analysis of reconceptualization and reprioritization revealed a cancer-specific effect: women with a history of cancer reconceptualized more, while women with no such history reprioritized more. CONCLUSION Our novel ad hoc quasi-qualitative tool made it possible to assess the QoL of women with a history of cancer, a particularly vulnerable population in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, it highlighted a difference in reconceptualization and reprioritization between this population and women with no such history.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Bauquier
- Inserm U1296, Radiations: Santé, Défense, Environnement, University Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, France.
| | - Stéphéline Ginguené
- Inserm U1296, Radiations: Santé, Défense, Environnement, University Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, France
| | - Tanguy Leroy
- Inserm U1296, Radiations: Santé, Défense, Environnement, University Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, France
| | - Marjolaine Doumergue
- Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale UR 4163, University Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, France
| | - Natacha Lebrun
- Inserm U1296, Radiations: Santé, Défense, Environnement, University Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, France
| | - Claire Della Vecchia
- Inserm U1296, Radiations: Santé, Défense, Environnement, University Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, France
| | - Renaud Mabire-Yon
- Inserm U1296, Radiations: Santé, Défense, Environnement, University Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, France
| | - Sarah Leveaux
- Inserm U1296, Radiations: Santé, Défense, Environnement, University Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, France
| | - Luis Sagaon-Teyssier
- INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de La Santé & Traitement de L'Information Médicale, ISSPAM, Aix Marseille University, 13005, Marseille, France
| | - Marie Préau
- Inserm U1296, Radiations: Santé, Défense, Environnement, University Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gupta V, Chauhan DS, Dutta K. Exploring prioritization through systematic literature surveys and case studies. Springerplus 2015; 4:539. [PMID: 26413445 PMCID: PMC4579198 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-015-1320-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2015] [Accepted: 09/07/2015] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
The software development process is a complex process, especially when the software has to be released in a phased manner. The high stakes involved and several constraints on resources lead to the selective implementation of the user requirements at each stage of the development. If the requirements considered, do not fit well, they have to be reprioritized. The objectives of this paper are to create a background related to the area of reprioritization and to create a distinguishable position from the prioritization area. The paper elaborates on the current state of reprioritization practices adopted in the software industry. The gaps in research in the area of reprioritization to present future opportunities for the research community are also analysed. This paper builds on the findings of a systematic literature survey (to analyze state of the art in the area of reprioritization), previous case studies (to gain understanding of real scenarios through limited available information), and more detailed real case study (focussed on reprioritization alone) conducted by fewer multinational software development organizations. Based on our studies it is concluded that the efficient reprioritization methods are required to be adopted in software engineering practices of the organisation in order to sustain in the highly competitive mass market.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Varun Gupta
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Hamirpur, India
| | | | - Kamlesh Dutta
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Hamirpur, India
| |
Collapse
|