Influence of two-dimensional expiratory airflow variations on respiratory particle propagation during pronunciation of the fricative [f]

Propagation of respiratory particles, potentially containing viable viruses, plays a significant role in the transmission of respiratory diseases (e.g., COVID-19) from infected people. Particles are produced in the upper respiratory system and exit the mouth during expiratory events such as sneezing, coughing, talking, and singing. The importance of considering speaking and singing as vectors of particle transmission has been recognized by researchers. Recently, in a companion paper, dynamics of expiratory flow during fricative utterances were explored, and significant variations of airflow jet trajectories were reported. This study focuses on respiratory particle propagation during fricative productions and the effect of airflow variations on particle transport and dispersion as a function of particle size. The commercial ANSYS-Fluent computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software was employed to quantify the fluid flow and particle dispersion from a two-dimensional mouth model of sustained fricative [f] utterance as well as a horizontal jet flow model. The fluid velocity field and particle distributions estimated from the mouth model were compared with those of the horizontal jet flow model. The significant effects of the airflow jet trajectory variations on the pattern of particle transport and dispersion during fricative utterances were studied. Distinct differences between the estimations of the horizontal jet model for particle propagation with those of the mouth model were observed. The importance of considering the vocal tract geometry and the failure of a horizontal jet model to properly estimate the expiratory airflow and respiratory particle propagation during the production of fricative utterances were emphasized.

The effect of activity and face masks on exhaled particles in children

Importance

Despite the high burden of respiratory infections among children, the production of exhaled particles during common activities and the efficacy of face masks in children have not been sufficiently studied.

Objective

To determine the effect of type of activity and mask usage on exhaled particle production in children.

Methods

Healthy children were asked to perform activities that ranged in intensity (breathing quietly, speaking, singing, coughing, and sneezing) while wearing no mask, a cloth mask, or a surgical mask. The concentration and size of exhaled particles were assessed during each activity.

Results

Twenty-three children were enrolled in the study. Average exhaled particle concentration increased by intensity of activity, with the lowest particle concentration during tidal breathing (1.285 particles/cm3 [95% CI 0.943, 1.627]) and highest particle concentration during sneezing (5.183 particles/cm3 [95% CI 1.911, 8.455]). High-intensity activities were associated with an increase primarily in the respirable size (≤ 5 µm) particle fraction. Surgical and cloth masks were associated with lower average particle concentration compared to no mask (P = 0.026 for sneezing). Surgical masks outperformed cloth masks across all activities, especially within the respirable size fraction. In a multivariable linear regression model, we observed significant effect modification of activity by age and by mask type.

Interpretation

Similar to adults, children produce exhaled particles that vary in size and concentration across a range of activities. Production of respirable size fraction particles (≤ 5 µm), the dominant mode of transmission of many respiratory viruses, increases significantly with coughing and sneezing and is most effectively reduced by wearing surgical face masks.

A laboratory model demonstrating the protective effects of surgical masks, face shields, and a combination of both in a speaking simulation

Background

The protection against aerosol transmission provided by masks vs face shields or in combination when speaking indoors is not well understood.

Methods

To simulate a human source, an aerosol generating system was made using a bacterial suspension in a nebulizer attached to an oxygen cylinder. A fan connected to the nebulizer created aerosols. Transmitted aerosols were detected using blood agar plates at 0.1524 and 1.8288 meters from source, simulating exposed person. The study was performed under controlled conditions at room temperature in a biohazard hood with high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter and UV light.

Results

When face shields were used alone, significant numbers of bacterial colonies grew on blood agar plates. When a mask used alone for both the subjects (source and exposed), the blood agar yielded minimal colony forming units at both distances. When face shields were used in combination with masks, no significant improvement was observed as compared to masks alone.

Discussion

Our results were similar to what have been observed in related studies.

Conclusions

Surgical masks alone provided good protection, surpassing the protection provided by face shields alone. Both used together provided the best protection, although the combined protection was similar to surgical masks use alone.