Reverse abdominoplasty as a salvage procedure for infected bilateral implant-based breast reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Infection is one of the most feared complications of implant-based breast reconstruction and is difficult to manage in irradiated patients. We present the first case of bilateral breast reconstruction with infected expanders salvaged by performing a reverse abdominoplasty.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 64-year-old woman with a history of locally advanced bilateral breast cancer underwent modified bilateral radical mastectomy and postmastectomy radiotherapy. We performed two-stage breast reconstruction with implants. However, the patient developed a mild infection of the expanders, which was treated with targeted oral antibiotic therapy. The response to treatment was favorable, allowing us to salvage the reconstruction with a reverse abdominoplasty.

DISCUSSION

Traditionally, the management of infected breast prostheses has consisted of removal of the infected implant, a complication that forces a delay in the reconstructive process. Successful reports of salvage of infected prostheses have been described in the literature. On the other hand, we were able to salvage the reconstruction by performing a reverse abdominoplasty, which allowed us to resect the irradiated tissue and provide adequate non-irradiated soft tissue coverage for the replaced implants.

CONCLUSION

Reverse abdominoplasty offers an acceptable aesthetic result with much less donor site morbidity and represents a valid alternative to other complex reconstruction techniques.

[Reverse abdominoplasty in the presence of bi-subcostal scar: Technical note]

INTRODUCTION

The presence of horizontal supraumbilical scars increases the risk of vascular complications after a large abdominoplasty. We present here a technique of abdominal dermolipectomy with umbilical transposition called « reverse », in the presence of a bi-subcostal scar.

TECHNICAL NOTE

The reverse abdominoplasty technique consists in uninserting the umbilicus, detaching the supra-umbilical and sub-umbilical soft tissues by assessing the existing bi-subcostal scar in order to pull the skin upwards, and to remove the supra-umbilical excess skin, before bringing the umbilicus back to its proper position.

DISCUSSION

This technique is a good alternative to perform an abdominal dermolipectomy in a patient with a history of bi-subcostal scarring without increasing the risk of abdominal skin necrosis, and without complicating or lengthening the conventional surgical procedure, provided that the upper redraping is achievable with sufficient upper excess skin and laxity.

[Case report: Epigastric dermatofibroma reconstruction by reverse abdominoplasty with umbilic transposition]

Dermatofibrosarcoma is the most common cutaneous sarcoma. Its surgical management is a technical challenge due to the high amount of substance loss. We explain a new technique of abdominal wall reconstruction by a reverse abdominoplasty with umbilical transposition. This new surgical technique allowed, in one time, the excision and the abdominal wall reconstruction. Functional and esthetic results are really satisfactory.

Trunkoplasty after massive weight loss - a case series with a one-stage body contouring procedure for the NHS patient

Body contouring post massive weight loss (MWL) is a considerable task and is often a functional rather than esthetic operation. Clinicians are often encouraged to solve multiple issues in a single setting that can be difficult in the MWL patient. A simple abdominoplasty often does not provide a satisfactory outcome in such patients and may result in disharmony of the esthetic unit of the trunk. Trunkoplasty is a technique that combines a fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty and reverse abdominoplasty. This is a one-stage operation to address the extra skin of the whole trunk esthetic unit. The average operation time was 4 h with a 3-surgeon team. No blood transfusions were required. There were 3 out of 15 patients with wound-related problems and no incidence of postoperative hematomas. There were no returns to theaters. Seromas formed were not symptomatic and no interventions were required. The average inpatient stay was 6.9 days and a return to work after 4 weeks. It can improve abdominal contour, define the waist, and improve mons ptosis in one stage without any change in position. This procedure has some specific advantages (accommodates preexisting abdominal scars), but also has shortcomings as compared to "standard" circumferential body contouring.