Spinal cord deformity with aggravation of tethering in saccular limited dorsal myeloschisis during the first 2 months of life

Background

Although the optimal timing of prophylactic untethering surgery for limited dorsal myeloschisis (LDM) with intact or subtle neurological findings diagnosed at birth remains undetermined, intentional delayed surgery is commonly used for flat and tail-like LDM. Conversely, for saccular LDM, early surgery is indicated during the postnatal period because it prevents rupture of the sac. We treated a saccular LDM patient, in whom intentional delayed surgery was selected because the sac was thickly covered with normal skin. We describe the clinical course of the case and discuss the optimal timing of the surgery.

Case Description

The patient had a dorsal midline sac in the upper lumbar region. Initial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after birth revealed a tethering tract that began at the dome of the sac and joined the lumbar cord. Dorsal bending of the cord at the stalk-cord union and invagination of the cord into the sac were noted. At 2 months, he was neurologically normal; however, the second MRI examination revealed that the cord tethering was aggravated. The cord was markedly displaced dorsally and to the left, with deviation of the cord to the sac out of the spinal canal. Following untethering surgery, the spinal cord deformity markedly improved.

Conclusion

Early surgery may be recommended for saccular LDM when tethering is present, including dorsal bending of the cord at the stalk-cord union and invagination of the cord into the sac observed on detailed MRI examination, even if the sac has no risk of rupture.

Terminal syringomyelia associated with lumbar limited dorsal myeloschisis

PURPOSE

Limited dorsal myeloschisis (LDM) is characterized by a fibroneural tethering stalk linking the skin lesion to the underlying spinal cord. Terminal syringomyelia, which is located at the lower third of the cord, is often associated with a tethered cord caused by various spinal dysraphisms; however, terminal syringomyelia has not been documented in LDM. The purpose of this study was to clarify the pathophysiological mechanisms of syringomyelia in LDM.

METHODS

In our 16 patients with lumbar LDM, three patients had terminal syringomyelia. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical, neuroradiological, intraoperative, and histopathological findings for these patients, with particular attention to the clinical course of the syrinx.

RESULTS

Patient 1 had a saccular skin lesion and patients 2 and 3 had flat lesions. In all patients, the syringomyelic cavity was located in the lower thoracolumbar cord, immediately rostral to the stalk-cord attachment at the lumbar level. The caudal pole of the syrinx extended to the thickened stalk at the attachment instead of at the caudal cord. Patient 3 had another syrinx in the stalk itself. The longitudinal axis of the syrinx and central canal coincided with the traveling angle of the LDM stalk at the stalk-cord attachment. In patient 1, histology revealed an ependyma-lined central canal in both the LDM stalk and meningocele sac. Patients 1 and 2 underwent syringostomy, but long-term effects were not obtained. Preoperative spontaneous resolution occurred in patient 3.

CONCLUSIONS

The histological findings in patient 1 supported the idea that segmental myelocystocele is involved in the development of saccular LDM. The hydromyelic central canal herniates and distends the stalk, resulting in the formation of the myelocystocele. It is possible that the hydromyelic central canal also distends the stalk of flat LDM lesions. The syrinx in patient 3 differed from that in patients 1 and 2, in that the syrinx resolved spontaneously. Further studies are needed to clarify the outcomes of syrinxes associated with LDM stalks.