The utility of fluorescence imaging in detecting primary and metastatic small bowel carcinoid tumors

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to investigate utility of indocyanine green (ICG) and autofluorescence (AF) imaging in detection of small bowel primary and metastatic carcinoids.

METHODS

Using Institutional Review Board approval, ICG and AF imaging of small bowel carcinoids was performed. Imaging findings were prospectively recorded in operating room and compared with conventional imaging, surgical exploration and pathologic findings.

RESULTS

There were 16 patients with 23 primary small bowel tumors, 27 mesenteric lymph nodes, 36 liver metastases and 2 peritoneal nodules. Carcinoid tumors exhibited brighter AF signals compared to background. AF imaging was superior to both DOTATATE PET and surgeon inspection/palpation in demonstrating small bowel primaries. Utility for metastatic lymph nodes and peritoneal metastases was limited. Superficial liver metastases exhibited brighter fluorescence compared to background on both ICG and AF imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest study assessing utility of near-infrared fluorescence imaging in detection of small bowel carcinoids. Our results show promise in the utilization fluorescence imaging to detect occult primary tumors and superficial liver metastases.

Multiomic sequencing of paired primary and metastatic small bowel carcinoids

Background: Small bowel carcinoids are insidious tumors that are often metastatic when diagnosed. Limited mutation landscape studies of carcinoids indicate that these tumors have a relatively low mutational burden. The development of targeted therapies will depend upon the identification of mutations that drive the pathogenesis and metastasis of carcinoid tumors. Methods: Whole exome and RNA sequencing of 5 matched sets of normal tissue, primary small intestine carcinoid tumors, and liver metastases were investigated. Germline and somatic variants included: single nucleotide variants (SNVs), insertions/deletions (indels), structural variants, and copy number alterations (CNAs). The functional impact of mutations was predicted using Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor. Results: Large-scale CNAs were observed including the loss of chromosome 18 in all 5 metastases and 3/5 primary tumors. Certain somatic SNVs were metastasis-specific; including mutations in ATRX, CDKN1B, MXRA5 (leading to the activation of a cryptic splice site and loss of mRNA), SMARCA2, and the loss of UBE4B. Additional mutations in ATRX, and splice site loss of PYGL, leading to intron retention observed in primary and metastatic tumors. Conclusions: We observed novel mutations in primary/metastatic carcinoid tumor pairs, and some have been observed in other types of neuroendocrine tumors. We confirmed a previously observed loss of chromosome 18 and CDKN1B. Transcriptome sequencing added relevant information that would not have been appreciated with DNA sequencing alone. The detection of several splicing mutations on the DNA level and their consequences at the RNA level suggests that RNA splicing aberrations may be an important mechanism underlying carcinoid tumors.