The burden of atrial fibrillation and heart failure in hospitalized patients: A real-world survey in a nationwide snapshot

PURPOSE

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) are common and commonly coexisting cardiovascular diseases in hospitalized patients. We report the absolute number and interrelation between AF and HF, assess the daily burden of both diseases on the healthcare system, and describe the medical treatment in a real-world, nationwide conducted snapshot survey.

METHODS

A questionnaire was equally distributed to various healthcare institutions. Data on the baseline characteristics, prior hospitalizations, and medical treatments of all hospitalized patients with AF and HF at a predefined date were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Seventy-five cardiological departments participated in this multicenter Greek nationwide study. A total of 603 patients (mean age, 74.5 ± 11.4 years) with AF, HF, or the combination of both were nationwide admitted. AF, HF, and the combination of both were registered in 122 (20.2%), 196 (32.5%), and 285 (47.3%) patients, respectively. First-time hospital admission was recorded in 273 (45.7%) of 597 patients, whereas 324 (54.3%) of 597 patients had readmissions in the past 12 months. Of the entire population, 453 (75.1%) were on beta-blockers (BBs), and 430 (71.3%) were on loop diuretics. Furthermore, 315 patients with AF (77.4%) were on oral anticoagulation, of whom 191 (46.9%) were on a direct oral anticoagulant and 124 (30.5%) were on a vitamin K antagonist.

CONCLUSION

Hospitalized patients with AF and/or HF have more than one admission within a year. Coexistence of AF and HF is more common. BBs and loop diuretics are the most commonly used drugs. More than three-quarters of the patients with AF were on oral anticoagulation.

Peri-procedural management, implantation feasibility, and short-term outcomes in patients undergoing implantation of leadless pacemakers: European Snapshot Survey

The aim of this European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) prospective snapshot survey is to assess procedural settings, safety measures, and short-term outcomes associated with implantation of leadless pacemakers (LLPM), across a broad range of tertiary European electrophysiology centres. An internet-based electronic questionnaire (30 questions) concerning implantation settings, peri-procedural routines, complications, and in-hospital patient outcomes was circulated to centres routinely implanting both LLPMs and transvenous pacemakers (TV-PM). The centres were requested to prospectively include consecutive patients implanted with either LLPMs or TV-PMs during the 10-week enrolment period. Overall, 21 centres from four countries enrolled 825 consecutive patients between November 2018 and January 2019, including 69 (9%) implanted with LLPMs. Leadless pacemakers were implanted mainly under local anaesthesia (69%), by an electrophysiologist (60%), in the electrophysiology laboratory (71%); 95% of patients received prophylactic antibiotics prior to implantation. Most patients on chronic oral anticoagulation were operated on-drug (35%), or during short-term (to 48 h) drug withdrawal (54%). Implantation was successful in 98% of patients and the only in-hospital procedure-related complication was groyne haematoma in one patient. This EHRA snapshot survey provides important insights into LLPM implantation routines and patient outcomes. These findings suggest that despite the unfavourable clinical profile of pacemaker recipients, LLPM implantation is associated with relatively low risk of complications and good short-term outcomes.