Real-world risk of cardiovascular diseases in patients with type 2 diabetes associated with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in comparison with metformin: A propensity score-matched model analysis in Japan

We aimed to compare the effects of cardiovascular disease risk in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes on sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2Is) or metformin. This retrospective, real-world cohort study was carried out using a claims database and propensity score matching; 58,402 eligible patients (29,201 per group) were included. The outcomes included nonfatal myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, nonfatal stroke, hospitalization for heart failure and composite end-points. The hazard ratio (HR) for the composite end-point was 0.79, which was lower for SGLT2Is than for metformin. For male patients (HR 0.76), patients aged <65 years (HR 0.94), patients aged ≥75 years (HR 0.78) and patients with body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 (HR 0.76), the HRs for the composite end-point were significantly lower in the SGLT2I group than in the metformin group. SGLT2Is might be superior to metformin in reducing the composite risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in Asian type 2 diabetes populations

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus continues to increase in many Asian countries, with possible contributing factors, such as younger-onset disease, diabetes development at lower body mass index, higher visceral fat accumulation and poorer β-cell function, among Asian populations. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors have been shown to confer favorable effects in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients, such as improved glycemic control, weight and blood pressure reduction, and importantly, cardiorenal benefits. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors are generally well-tolerated, and have a well-defined safety profile based on evidence from numerous clinical trials and post-marketing pharmacovigilance reporting. To our knowledge, this review is the first to provide a comprehensive coverage of the adverse events of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, as well as their management and counseling aspects for Asian type 2 diabetes mellitus populations.

Acute kidney injury in Japanese type 2 diabetes patients receiving sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors: A nationwide cohort study

The present retrospective study aimed to identify factors associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors. We identified 171,622 patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors; among them, 476 (0.3%) patients developed acute kidney injury. The hazard ratio for acute kidney injury occurrence risk was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for patient characteristics at baseline and use of concomitant agents. In the adjusted model, patients who developed acute kidney injury were mostly men, aged ≥65 years, had lower body mass index, had a history of heart failure and used diuretics more frequently than those who did not. These findings suggest that associated clinical risk factors should be thoroughly evaluated before administering sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors to minimize acute kidney injury onset.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and anemia among diabetes patients in real clinical practice

Aims/Introduction

Sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) were reported to increase hemoglobin levels in short‐term clinical trials. Whether it is also true in real clinical practice is unknown.

Materials and Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study. Inclusion criterion was diabetes patients who visited our outpatient clinic from January 2019 to August 2020. Exposure of interest was the use of SGLT2i. Outcomes were hemoglobin levels. For the cross‐sectional analyses, non‐linear regression models were fitted with restricted cubic splines to investigate the association between hemoglobin levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) for users and non‐users of SGLT2i. For the case–control study, cases (anemia defined as hemoglobin <120 g/L for men, <110 g/L for women or the use of erythropoiesis stimulating agents) and controls were matched by age, sex and eGFR.

Results

Among 2,063 diabetes patients, 723 were taking SGLT2i. In the cross‐sectional analyses, hemoglobin levels were higher among SGLT2i users compared with non‐users at eGFR >15 mL/min/1.73 m². For the case–control study, 197 cases and controls were matched. Conditional logistic regression showed that the use of SGLT2i was associated with significantly lower prevalence of anemia (odd ratio 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.21–0.58). Adjusted mean differences in hemoglobin levels between users and propensity score‐matched non‐users of SGLT2i were 7.0 g/L (95% confidence interval 3.0–10.0 g/L) at 6 months. Among SGLT2i users, the odds of an increase in 6‐month hemoglobin were similar across eGFR categories, except for eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m².

Conclusions

The use of SGLT2i was associated with higher hemoglobin levels and lower prevalence of anemia in real clinical practice.