Laparoscopic versus open surgery in obstructive colorectal cancer patients following stents placement: a comprehensive meta-analysis of cohort studies

BACKGROUND

Over the past decade, the use of stent placement as a bridge to surgery (BTS) has emerged as an alternative to emergency surgery for patients with (OCRC). However, the optimal surgical approach remains indeterminate. This study seeks to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a combined treatment modality involving stent placement and laparoscopic surgery for OCRC presenting with malignant obstruction.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted until June 2023 to identify studies that compared laparoscopic to open surgery in patients with OCBC following stent insertion.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis incorporated 12 cohort studies, encompassing 933 patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the 30-day mortality rates between the two groups (relative risk [RR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26 to 4.48; P = 0.95). Compared to the laparoscopic approach group, the open approach group had a higher rate of overall postoperative complications (POCs) (RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.72, P < 0.0001). There was no significant variance in lymph node (LN) dissection number between the groups (mean differences [MD], 1.64; 95% CI - 1.51 to 4.78; P = 0.31). Notably, laparoscopic surgery resulted in less intraoperative blood loss (MD, - 25.84 ml; 95% CI - 52.16 to 0.49; P = 0.05) and a longer operation time (MD, 20.99 mins; 95% CI 2.31 to 39.44; P = 0.03). The laparoscopic approach was associated with a shorter length of hospital stay (LOS) (MD - 3.29 days; 95% CI - 5.27 to 1.31; P = 0.001). Conversely, the open approach group had a higher rate of postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) (RR 0.47; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.96, P = 0.04). Although the number of included studies was insufficient to conduct a meta-analysis, several of them imply that laparoscopic surgery may yield more favorable outcomes in terms of the 3-year overall survival rate (OS), 3-year disease-free survival rate (DFS), 5-year OS, and 5-year DFS when compared to open surgery. It is worth noting that these differences lack statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

In patients with OCRC subjected to stent insertion, laparoscopic surgery arguably presents a modest superiority over open surgery by diminishing the overall postoperative risk and potentially reducing the LOS.

Combined treatment of refractory benign stricture after esophageal endoscopic mucosal dissection: A case report

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) post-procedure stricture is a relatively common long-term complication following ESD treatment. A range of approaches has been implemented for the treatment of post-procedural stricture using endoscopic techniques such as endoscopic dilation, self-expandable metallic stent insertion, local steroid injection in the esophagus, oral steroid administration, radial incision and cutting (RIC). The actual efficacy of these different therapeutic options is highly variable, and uniform international standards for the prevention or treatment of stricture.

CASE SUMMARY

In this report, we describe the case of a 51-year-old male diagnosed with early esophageal cancer. To protect against esophageal stricture, the patient was administered oral steroids and underwent self-expandable metallic stent insertion for 45 d. Despite these interventions, stricture was detected at the lower edge of the stent following its removal. The patient remained refractory to multiple rounds of endoscopic bougie dilation treatment, and thus suffered from complex refractory benign esophageal stricture. As such, RIC combined with bougie dilation and steroid injection was employed to treat this patient more effectively, ultimately achieving satisfactory therapeutic efficacy.

CONCLUSION

Combination of RIC, dilation, and steroid injection can be safely and effectively implemented to treat cases of post-ESD refractory esophageal stricture.

Think twice before stent insertion for renal artery aneurysm with elusive etiology: a case report

BACKGROUND

Endovascular treatment has been recognized as the first line therapy for renal artery aneurysm (RAA). However, RAA related with malignancies had been sporadically reported in the literature. Stent insertion should be contraindicated for RAAs with malignant etiology, whereas surgery be optimal.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 40-year-old female underwent covered stent insertion to exclude the left RAA for suspected Takayasu arteritis in a reginal hospital. Three months later the RAA recurred with sign of threatened rupture, and the patient was transferred for salvage embolization with coils and thrombin injection. However, 20 days after the embolization procedure, multiple painful subcutaneous nodules developed in her flanks. Undifferentiated sarcoma was revealed by the pathological biopsy of the nodules. The RAA in this case was most likely related with the malignancy.

CONCLUSION

Malignancy was the most likely etiology behind recurrent aneurysm in this case. Definite diagnosis is mandatory for interventional radiologists before stent insertion for treatment of RAA.