Use of Sundt Clip Graft for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

Dr Thoralf Sundt III joined the department of neurosurgery at Mayo Clinic in 1969 and served as chairman from 1980 until his death in 1992. Dr Sundt was a pioneer in the field of cerebrovascular neurosurgery and among his many contributions to neurosurgical technology was the introduction of the Sundt clip graft (Codman, Raynham, Massachusetts), which was developed in partnership with Dr George Kees. This device is a vessel-encircling Teflon or Dacron graft loaded on a circular metallic spring initially designed to repair injuries to vessel walls during intracranial aneurysm surgery,1 which was not an uncommon complication resulting from the use of contemporary aneurysm clips.2 When used for this purpose, the clip graft has demonstrated both safety and efficacy in a modern series of surgical treatment of intracranial aneurysm.3 An additional application of the clip graft is the direct clipping of aneurysms, particularly side-wall aneurysms, though Dr Sundt recognized that the potential to occlude perforating arteries adjacent to the aneurysm neck would limit the general use of the clip graft for aneurysm clipping.2 In the following video, we present archival footage of Dr Sundt utilizing the Sundt clip graft during intracranial aneurysm surgery. The 3 cases are of the treatment of posterior communicating, middle cerebral, and anterior communicating artery aneurysms and depict the potential applications of the clip graft during aneurysm surgery. We also present footage of animal experiments Dr Sundt performed to validate the use of the clip graft. This footage likely represents some of the first microscopic neurosurgical recordings ever made. The patients consented to the procedure and to presentation of video recordings at the time of initial surgery. Image of Sundt at 0:11, Reproduced with permission from the American Association of Neurological Surgeons, 5550 Meadowbrook Dr, Rolling Meadows, IL 60008. Figures at 2:26 and 2:28, from Park PJ, Meyer FB, The Sundt clip graft, Neurosurgery, 2010;66(6 suppl operative):300-305, by permission of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Figure at 2:35, ©2009 Mayo, Clingman. Used with permission.

Can we rely on surgical clips placed during oncoplastic breast surgery to accurately delineate the tumor bed for targeted breast radiotherapy?

PURPOSE

Oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS) is gaining popularity among surgeons for breast-conserving surgery treatments. OBS relies on complex relocation and deformation of breast tissue involving the tumor bed (TB). In this study, we investigate the validity of using surgical clips with OBS for accurate TB delineation in adjuvant, targeted breast radiotherapy.

METHODS

Different OBS techniques were simulated on realistic breast phantoms. Surgical clips were used to demarcate the TB. Following tumor resection and closure, the true TB (TB_True) was extracted. Each phantom was CT imaged at several phases of surgery in order to record pre- and post-OBS closure surgical clip displacements. Two senior radiation oncologists (ROs) were asked to delineate TBs on CTs by relying on surgical clips placed as per standard protocol, and by referring to operative notes. Their original contours, as well as those expanded using 5-15 mm margins, were compared with the accurate TB_True using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff Distance (HD), and over- and under-contoured volumes. Inter- and intra-RO contour agreements were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Post-OBS surgical clips were significantly displaced outside the original breast quadrant. Inter- and Intra-RO TB contours were consistent, yet systematically differed from TB_True (DSC values range = 0.38 to 0.69, and maximum HD range = 17.8 mm to 38.0 mm). Using expansion margins did not improve contour congruence and caused significant over-contoured volumes.

CONCLUSION

Following OBS, surgical clips alone are not reliable radiographic surrogates of TB locations and accurate TB delineation is challenging. For complex OBS cases, indication of any type of partial breast irradiation is very questionable.

Microwave Ablation in the Proximity of Surgical Clips: Is there a Safety Issue?

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the heat generation of surgical clips within the target area of MWA and the influences on the ablation volume.

Materials and Methods

In bovine liver tissue, 42 ex vivo microwave ablations (60 W; 180 s) were performed. During ablation, the temperature was measured continuously at 4 points of interest (POI), in a distance of 7.5 and 15 mm on each side of the microwave antenna, with a titanium surgical placed at one 7.5-mm POI. Ablation volumes containing large vessels (n = 10) were excluded. For every POI, the mean temperature of 32 ablations was calculated. The mean temperatures were compared between the 4 POI and statistically analyzed using the Student’s t test.

Results

The mean maximum temperatures at the side of the clip were 88.76 °C/ 195 s and 52.97 °C/ 195 s and at the side without clip 78.75 °C/ 195 s and 43.16 °C/ 195 s, respectively, at POI 7.5 mm and POI 15 mm. The maximum difference of mean temperatures for POI 7.5 mm was 12.91 °C at 84 s (p = 0.022) and for POI 15 mm 9.77 °C at 195 s (p = 0.009). No significant changes in size and shape of the ablation zone could be determined.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated significantly higher temperatures adjacent to surgical clips. Also, the temperatures distal to the titanium clip were higher compared to the control location without clip. These findings suggest an increased risk of thermal damage to surrounding tissues during MWA, especially in case of immediate contact to surgical clips.

Surgical Clips in Breast-conserving Surgery: Do they Represent the Tumour Bed Accurately?

INTRODUCTION

Radiotherapy after Breast-Conserving Surgery (BCS) is a standard treatment for breast cancer. Currently, surgical clips are used to determine the tumour bed before radiotherapy planning. This study aimed to evaluate the migration of these clips on mammograms.

METHODS

The study was conducted on 121 females who were treated with radiotherapy after BCS at their first radiologic control examination 6 months after the end of treatment. MLO and CC views of all cases were evaluated regarding the clips. The distance between the surgical scar centre and the centre of the area covered by the clips was measured on both MLO and CC projections and recorded separately. This distance was determined as the clip displacement. A displacement ≤10 mm was recorded as no displacement.

RESULTS

The clips were out of the images and were not evaluated in 45 cases (37.2%) on CC and in 9 cases (7.4%) on MLO projections. There were no clip displacements in 37 (30.6%) cases on CC and in 43 (35.5%) cases on MLO views. The amount of displacement ranged from 11 to 56 mm with a mean of 24.38 mm on CC views, while on MLO projections, displacement ranged from 11 to 66 mm with a mean of 24.42 mm.

CONCLUSION

A clip displacement of greater than 10 mm was found in 64.5% of cases on MLO views. Therefore, we believe that the reliability of these clips for accurate delineation of the tumour bed in radiotherapy planning is controversial and other methods must be added.

Intra- and inter-observer variability in breast tumour bed contouring and the controversial role of surgical clips

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the visualization of surgical clips (SCs) on the same set of planning computed tomography (CT) of breast cancer (BC) patients influences agreement on tumour bed (TB) delineation. Planning CT (CT_orig) of 47 BC patients with SCs to visualize the TB was processed in order to blur SCs and create a virtual CT (CT_mod). Four radiation oncologists (ROs, 2 juniors and 2 seniors) contoured TB on both the CT sets. Centre of mass distance (CMD), percentage overlap as Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), surface distance as average Hausdorff distance (AHD) and TB volume size were analysed. The intra-observer variability when contouring TB with and without SCs was statistically significant (p-values = 0.016, 0.0002 and ≪ 0.001 for CMD, AHD and DSC, respectively). Junior ROs showed worse reproducibility compared to seniors. The median DSC was < 0.7. The inter-observer variability with and without SCs was statistically significant (p < 0.001) for all metrics, with an increase of 48.7% in DSC and decrease of 50.7% and 57.1% in CMD and AHD, respectively, as relative median values, when SCs were visible. Regarding TB volumes, when SCs were visible, the intra-observer analysis revealed that 3/4 ROs delineated larger volumes, especially juniors. The inter-observer analysis showed that, in presence of visible SCs, the difference in TB volume among all the ROs fell from statistically significant to borderline significance (p = 0.052). TB contouring is confirmed to be an observer-dependent task. SCs decreased the intra and inter-observer variability but the overall agreement between ROs remained low.

What a difference a clip makes! Analysis of boost volume definition in radiation therapy for conservative breast surgery

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

To evaluate the role of surgical clips placement in the definition of boost treatment volume.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Clinical Target Volumes (CTV) were defined as: CTV Breast, CTV Quadrant (based on physical exam and pre-surgical images), CTV Boost, defined by clip plus margin (1 cm for 2 or more clips and 2 cm for 1 clip only) plus radiological changes, CTV NT (normal tissue), defined by CTV Quadrant minus CTV Boost and CTV MISS (CTV that would be outside the treatment volume), defined by CTV Boost minus CTV Quadrant.

RESULTS

A total of 247 patients were included. Upper lateral quadrant was the most common clinical location (47.3%). The median number of clips used was three. The mean volumes were: CTV Breast:982.52 cc, CTV Boost:36.59 cc, CTV Quadrant:285.07 cc, CTV NT:210.1 cc and CTV MISS:13.57 cc. Only 50.6% (125) of the patients presented the CTV Boost completely inside the CTV Quadrant and in 47.3% (117), partially inside. Among patients with any CTV MISS, 80.3% (98) had 10% or more of CTV Boost outside the treatment volume. Regarding CTV MISS, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups with 1 clip versus 2 or more clips, nor between patients with or without reconstructive surgery. In average, the CTV Boost was 87% smaller than the CTV Quadrant. The whole quadrant irradiation would lead to unnecessary irradiation of 26% of normal breast tissue.

CONCLUSION

Surgical bed clipping is up most important in the definition of the boost volume irradiation to ensure precision minimizing geographical miss and optimizing surrounding normal tissue sparing.