Bilateral Spigelian Hernias Robotic Repair: A Novel Approach to a Rare Surgical Entity

Spigelian hernias are an uncommon protrusion defect noted between the rectus abdominis and the transversus abdominis muscles, at the semilunar line, with a low incidence of approximately 0.12% to 2% of all ventral hernias. Furthermore, the incidence of bilateral cases is noted to be even lower in the general population. They are associated with bowel incarceration and strangulation; hence surgical repair is indicated. Therapeutic alternatives for Spigelian hernias include open repair, however laparoscopic repair stands as the standard of care in these cases. Feasible and successful robotic repair has been reported, with associated advantages in terms of visualization and surgical instrument dexterity. We present the first ever reported cases of bilateral Spigelian hernias repaired using robotic approach. Two female Puerto Rican patients referred to our institution complaining of abdominal pain, where imaging studies found bilateral Spigelian hernias. In both cases, a transabdominal preperitoneal repair was performed using the Da Vinci Surgical System. Both patients were discharged home tolerating oral intake with adequate wound healing. On follow up visits, patients denied abdominal discomfort and had adequate wound healing. Robotic surgery for Spigelian hernias poses an advantage over laparoscopic repair as improved visualization, mobility, and precision in movements allow for more gentle tissue manipulation. Furthermore, this is the first evidence of safe and effective repair in the uncommon entity of bilateral cases, providing a newer alternative in the setting of such presentation.

A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of the effects of infusing local analgesia on post-operative pain during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

PURPOSE

While it is widely accepted that laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal herniorrhaphy has decreased post-operative pain, there are conflicting data as to whether instillation of local anesthetic into the preperitoneal space improves post-operative pain in these patients. We designed a prospective study to evaluate this. Secondary outcomes include time spent in the PACU, need for narcotic pain medication, and total amount of narcotics required postoperatively.

METHODS

Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study which enrolled 70 patients with unilateral non-recurrent inguinal hernia from 09/2013 to 03/2019 and included immediate and 2-week post-operative follow-up. All patients received unilateral laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair with control patients receiving 10 ml of 0.9% saline instilled into preperitoneal space while treatment group received 10-ml 0.5% bupivacaine without epinephrine.

RESULTS

A total of 70 patients [67 (96%) men and 3 women; mean age (SD), 57 years (13.8)] were enrolled, 35 randomized into each group. Demographics between the two groups were similar. No differences were found in post-operative pain between the control and test groups at 1 h [mean (SD) of 3.15(2.5) vs 3.21(2.9); P = 0.92], 2 h [3.39 (1.55) vs 2.74 (1.85) P = 0.18], or 1 day [4.79 (2.19) vs 4.39 (2.37); P = 0.13] postoperatively. Likewise, no significant differences were observed in usage of narcotic pain medication postoperatively, as 17 control patients (50%) and 16 (46%) study patients required narcotics within 2 h of surgery (P = 0.72).

CONCLUSION

Instilling local anesthetic into the preperitoneal space during laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair did not result in statistically significant difference in post-operative pain (Rade et al. in NESS Annual Meeting, 2021). Trial registry ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02055053.

Total extraperitoneal endoscopic hernioplasty (TEP) versus Lichtenstein hernioplasty: a systematic review by updated traditional and cumulative meta-analysis of randomised-controlled trials

Background–purpose

Totally extraperitoneal (TEP) endoscopic hernioplasty and Lichtenstein hernioplasty are the most commonly used approaches for inguinal hernia repair. However, current evidence on which is the preferred approach is inconclusive. This updated meta-analysis was conducted to track the accumulation of evidence over time.

Methods

Studies were identified by a systematic literature search of the EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases. Fixed- and random-effects models were used to cumulatively assess the accumulation of evidence over time.

Results

The TEP cohort showed significantly higher rates of recurrences and vascular injuries compared to the Lichtenstein cohort; [Peto Odds ratio (OR) = 1.58 (1.22, 2.04), p = 0.005], [Peto OR = 2.49 (1.05, 5.88), p = 0.04], respectively. In contrast, haematoma formation rate, time to return to usual activities, and local paraesthesia were significantly lower in the TEP cohort compared to the Lichtenstein cohort; [Peto OR = 0.26 (0.16, 0.41), p ≤ 0.001], [mean difference = − 6.32 (− 8.17, − 4.48), p ≤ 0.001], [Peto OR = 0.26 (0.17, 0.40), p ≤ 0.001], respectively.

Conclusions

This study, which is based on randomised-controlled trials (RCTs) of high quality, showed significantly higher rates of recurrences and vascular injuries in the TEP cohort than in the Lichtenstein cohort. In contrast, rate of postoperative haematoma formation, local paraesthesia, and time to return to usual activities were significantly lower in the TEP cohort than in the Lichtenstein cohort. Future multicentre RCTs with strict adherence to the standards recommended in the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines will shed further light on the topic.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s10029-019-02049-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.