1
|
Alford-Teaster J, Vaclavik D, Imset I, Schiffelbein J, Lyons K, Kapadia N, Olson A, McGrath EB, Schifferdecker K, Onega T. From active treatment to surveillance: how the barriers and facilitators of implementing survivorship care planning could be an opportunity for telehealth in oncology care for rural patients. J Cancer Surviv 2023:10.1007/s11764-023-01447-5. [PMID: 38066227 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01447-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer survivorship care planning is a recognized yet underutilized aspect of care delivery, and the opportunity for telehealth in cancer survivorship is examined. METHODS We conducted a mixed-methods study in Vermont and New Hampshire to characterize perceptions of rural cancer providers and survivors regarding survivorship transitions in care, consisting of (a) key informant interviews with primary care and oncology clinicians, (b) a broader survey of clinicians, and (c) surveys and focus group discussions with cancer survivors. In these interactions, we also explored the use of a shared telehealth survivorship care planning appointment between oncology clinicians, primary care clinicians, and survivors. RESULTS Results from surveys and interviews clustered around several themes, namely (1) infrequent care transitioning back to primary care, (2) lack of mental health services, (3) lack of side effect education, (4) low perceived utility of survivorship care plans, (5) clinicians exclusively communicate using the EMR and finding it imperfect, and (6) clinicians and survivors reported conflicting perceptions regarding survivors' access to telehealth options. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that telehealth has the potential to augment the delivery of survivorship care planning; however, key technical and logistical concerns need to be addressed, particularly enhanced coordination across clinician scheduling and ensuring payment parity for various telehealth implementation strategies. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Cancer survivorship care planning is a recognized yet underutilized aspect of care delivery. There is an opportunity for the application of telehealth for supportive care in survivorship care planning, which should be a focus of further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Alford-Teaster
- Dartmouth Cancer Center, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA.
| | - Danielle Vaclavik
- Center for Program Design and Evaluation (CPDE) at the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice (TDI), Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Inger Imset
- Population Health, Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | | | | | - Nirav Kapadia
- Dartmouth Cancer Center, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Ardis Olson
- Dartmouth Cancer Center, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA
| | | | - Karen Schifferdecker
- Center for Program Design and Evaluation (CPDE) at the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice (TDI), Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Tracy Onega
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah and Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Patel KB, Tabriz AA, Turner K, Gonzalez BD, Oswald LB, Jim HS, Nguyen OT, Hong YR, Aldawoodi N, Cao B, Wang X, Rollison DE, Robinson EJ, Naso C, Spiess PE. Telemedicine Adoption in an NCI-Designated Cancer Center During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Report on Patient Experience of Care. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2023; 21:496-502.e6. [PMID: 37156477 PMCID: PMC10777340 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with cancer require timely access to care so that healthcare providers can prepare an optimal treatment plan with significant implications for quality of life and mortality. The COVID-19 pandemic spurred rapid adoption of telemedicine in oncology, but study of patient experience of care with telemedicine in this population has been limited. We assessed overall patient experience of care with telemedicine at an NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center during the COVID-19 pandemic and examined changes in patient experience over time. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a retrospective study of outpatient oncology patients who received treatment at Moffitt Cancer Center. Press Ganey surveys were used to assess patient experience. Data from patients with appointments between April 1, 2020, and June 30, 2021, were analyzed. Patient experience was compared between telemedicine and in-person visits, and patient experience with telemedicine over time was described. RESULTS A total of 33,318 patients reported Press Ganey data for in-person visits, and 5,950 reported Press Ganey data for telemedicine visits. Relative to patients with in-person visits, more patients with telemedicine visits gave higher satisfaction ratings for access (62.5% vs 75.8%, respectively) and care provider concern (84.2% vs 90.7%, respectively) (P<.001). When adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, sex, insurance, and clinic type, telemedicine visits consistently outperformed in-person visits over time regarding access and care provider concern (P<.001). There were no significant changes over time in satisfaction with telemedicine visits regarding access, care provider concern, telemedicine technology, or overall assessment (P>.05). CONCLUSIONS In this study, a large oncology dataset showed that telemedicine resulted in better patient experience of care in terms of access and care provider concern compared with in-person visits. Patient experience of care with telemedicine visits did not change over time, suggesting that implementing telemedicine was effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krupal B. Patel
- Department of Head and Neck and Endocrine Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Amir Alishahi Tabriz
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Kea Turner
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Brian D. Gonzalez
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Laura B. Oswald
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Heather S.L. Jim
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Oliver T. Nguyen
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Young-Rock Hong
- Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | | | - Biwei Cao
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Xuefeng Wang
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Dana E. Rollison
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Edmondo J. Robinson
- Department of Internal and Hospital Medicine, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
- Center for Digital Health, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Cristina Naso
- Virtual Health Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Philippe E. Spiess
- Virtual Health Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lindsay D, Bates N, Callander E, Johnston K, Carlisle K, Smith D, Evans R, Larkins S. Evaluating the quality and safety of the BreastScreen remote radiology assessment model of service delivery in Australia. J Telemed Telecare 2023; 29:203-210. [PMID: 33283606 DOI: 10.1177/1357633x20975653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in Australian women. Given the diverse geography and populations within Australia, the ability to offer a telemedicine-supported breast screening and assessment service may increase access. The aim of this study was to assess clinical outcomes of a telemedicine-based remote radiology assessment service delivery model for detecting breast cancer in regional Australian women compared to the traditional radiologist onsite model. METHODS This study was a pre-post intervention study using de-identified administrative data. Data were collected from seven sites across three health jurisdictions within Australia. There were a total of 21,117 assessment visits, with 10,508 (49.8%) pre- and 10,609 (50.2%) post-remote model implementation. Of the 10,609 post-remote model visits, 3,904 (36.8%) were under the remote model. The main outcome was cancer detection, split into any cancer, any invasive cancer or any small invasive cancer. Timeliness of assessment was also examined. RESULTS After adjusting for multiple factors, there were no statistically significant differences in cancer detection rates between the remote and onsite models (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.02, 95% CI 0.86-1.19, n.s.). Implementing the remote assessment model had statistically significant positive effects on the timeliness of assessment (AOR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.59-0.77, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION This study found the remote model delivers safe and high-quality assessment services, with equivalent rates of cancer detection and improved timeliness of assessment when compared to the traditional onsite model. Careful monitoring and ongoing evaluation of any health-service model is important for ongoing safety, efficiency and acceptability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Lindsay
- College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Australia.,Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Australia
| | - Nicole Bates
- College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Australia
| | - Emily Callander
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia
| | - Karen Johnston
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Australia.,Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Australia
| | - Karen Carlisle
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Australia.,Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Australia
| | - Deb Smith
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Australia.,Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Australia
| | - Rebecca Evans
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Australia.,Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Australia
| | - Sarah Larkins
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Australia.,Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Salehi F, Mashhadi L, Khazeni K, Ebrahimi Z. Management of Cancer Patients in the COVID-19 Crisis Using Telemedicine: A Systematic Review. Stud Health Technol Inform 2022; 299:118-125. [PMID: 36325852 DOI: 10.3233/shti220969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Telemedicine can provide a solution for disease management during the COVID-19 pandemic. This literature review aims to explore the role of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic for management of cancer patients. METHOD A comprehensive systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Science Direct, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for the papers published until April 2021. Studies were included in case they had practically used telemedicine in the management of cancer patients during the COVID-19 crisis. RESULTS After screening 2614 titles and abstracts and reviewing 305 full-texts, 16 studies were found to be eligible. The results indicated that most of the patients contacted by telemedicine services mostly used to intract with patients breast cancer (n=4, 25%). The most common use of telemedicine was the provision of virtual visit services (n=10, 62.25%). Besides, communication was most frequently provided by live video conferences (n=11, 68.75%). CONCLUSION Telemedicine can provide continued access to necessary health services in oncology care and serve as an important role in pandemic planning and response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatemeh Salehi
- School of Management and Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Leila Mashhadi
- Department of Anesthesia, Lung Diseases Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Kamran Khazeni
- Department of Otolaryngology, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Zahra Ebrahimi
- Human Resource Management, Faculty of Management, Islamic Azad University of North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Banerjee SC, Staley JM, Howell F, Malling C, Moreno A, Kotsen C, Parikh D, Parker PA. Communicating Effectively via Tele-oncology (Comskil TeleOnc): a Guide for Best Practices for Communication Skills in Virtual Cancer Care. J Cancer Educ 2022; 37:1343-1348. [PMID: 33544315 PMCID: PMC7862043 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-021-01959-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
The emergence of a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2, causing coronavirus disease 2019 or COVID-19) has disrupted the US medical care system. Telemedicine has rapidly emerged as a critical technology enabling health care visits to continue while supporting social distancing to reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission among patients, families, and clinicians. This model of patient care is being utilized at major cancer centers around the USA-and tele-oncology (telemedicine in oncology) has rapidly become the primary method of providing cancer care. However, most clinicians have little experience and inadequate training in this new form of care delivery. Because many practicing oncology clinicians are not familiar with telemedicine technology and the best practices for virtual communication, we strongly believe that training in this field is essential. Utilizing best practices of communication skills training, this paper presents a brief tele-oncology communication guide (Comskil TeleOnc) to address the timely need to maximize high-quality care to patients with cancer. The goal of the Comskil TeleOnc Guide is to recognize, elicit, and effectively respond to patients' medical needs and concerns while utilizing empathic responses to communicate understanding, alleviate distress, and provide support via videoconferencing. We recommend five strategies to achieve the communication goal outlined above: (1) Establish the clinician-patient relationship/create rapport, (2) set the agenda, (3) respond empathically to emotions, (4) deliver the information, and (5) effectively end the tele-oncology visit. The guide proposed in this paper is not all-encompassing and may not be applicable to all health care institutions; however, it provides a practical, patient-centered framework to conduct a tele-oncology visit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Smita C Banerjee
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Ave., 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10022, USA.
| | - Jessica M Staley
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Ave., 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Frances Howell
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Ave., 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Charlotte Malling
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Ave., 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Aimee Moreno
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Ave., 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Chris Kotsen
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Ave., 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| | - Dhwani Parikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 136 Mountain View Blvd, Basking Ridge, NJ, 07920, USA
| | - Patricia A Parker
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Ave., 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This paper summarizes early experiences of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic, the patient and physician experience, limitations in accessibility introduced by telemedicine, and the opportunities and anticipated sustained role of telemedicine for cancer care. RECENT FINDINGS Research from a wide range of oncology facilities consistently demonstrates the feasibility of delivering telemedicine services over audio (telephone) and/or video platforms. Emerging work highlights that telemedicine is well suited for a subset of patients and clinical settings and that there are methods by which current disparities could potentially be ameliorated. Several current uncertainties limit the broad applicability of telemedicine longitudinally. Early responses to the pandemic that included rapid introduction of telemedicine demonstrated the feasibility of audio- and video-based platforms that achieved promising utility, while simultaneously demonstrating disparities based on patient characteristics and infrastructural support. Its long-term role will likely depend greatly on reimbursement and regulatory reform.
Collapse
|