A case report of circular external fixator with low-profile mini-fragment plate fixation: A combination of two methods for a tibial pilon fracture

Tibial pilon fractures are difficult to treat. These fractures are associated with a high frequency of soft tissue complications. Therefore, two-stage surgery and less invasive surgical strategies using external fixation have been reported. The patient was a 79-year-old man. The right tibial pilon fracture was diagnosed as AO/OTA 43C3.1, Rüedi and Allgöwer type 2. He was treated with a low-profile mini-fragment plate and circular (Ilizarov type) external fixation. Herein, we report on a combination of these two methods: circular external fixator with low-profile mini-fragment plate fixation. At 18 months postoperatively, the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot score was a perfect score of 100. Radiographs taken in the loading position showed no narrowing of the joint fissure. There were no soft tissue infections, no plate breakage, no bone fusion, no symptoms of plate irritation, and no need for nail extraction.

Should the location of distal tibial plating be influenced by the varus or valgus fracture pattern of tibial pilon fracture?

INTRODUCTION

Operative treatment of tibial pilon fracture is challenging. There is a lack of consensus and only one clinical study on the optimal location of distal tibial plating for fixation of pilon fractures based on varus or valgus fracture patterns. We hypothesize that complications rates, specifically mechanical complications, are not influenced by the location of the tibial plating in the fixation of pilon fractures with respect to varus or valgus fracture patterns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-nine patients who had single plating for tibial pilon from 2007 to 2017 were recruited. They were divided into two groups, transverse fibular fracture (varus fracture pattern) and comminuted fibular fracture (valgus fracture pattern). Our primary outcome measure was any mechanical complications as a result of the location of plating (medial vs lateral) on varus or valgus fracture patterns.

RESULTS

There were 38 (55.1%) patients with varus fracture pattern and 31 (44.9%) patients with valgus fracture pattern tibial pilon fractures. In the varus fracture pattern group, mechanical complications were not significantly different between the two plating locations (27.3 vs 33.3%, p > 0.05). Notably, there were more fibula fixations performed in patients with medial plating (74.1 vs 45.5%, p = 0.092) when compared those with lateral plating in the varus fracture pattern group. There were also no statistically significant differences found although 10 (40%) out of 25 patients had mechanical complications in the medial plating group compared to 1 (16.7%) out of 6 patients with lateral plating (p = 0.383) in the valgus fracture pattern group.

CONCLUSION

There were no differences in mechanical complications for medial vs lateral plating in tibial pilon fracture based on varus or valgus deforming forces. As much as we should consider the fracture patterns and deforming forces when deciding on plating location, other factors such as careful soft tissue management and fragment-specific fixation should be prioritized.

Fibula fixation in the treatment of tibial pilon fractures - Is it really necessary?

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of consensus about the role of fibula fixation in these complex fractures, with only two clinical studies in the literature. We hypothesize that the fibula fracture need not be fixed in the tibial pilon fractures if primary stability can be achieved with tibial fixation alone.

METHODS

We reviewed 79 patients with operatively treated tibial pilon with associated fibula fractures from 2007 to 2017 and divided them into two groups; patients with fibula fracture fixation and those without fixation. The primary outcome measure was any mechanical complications. Secondary outcomes were wound complications and other morbidities.

RESULTS

There were 54 (68.4%) patients with fibula fixation and 25 (31.6%) patients without fixation. There were no statistically significant differences in mechanical complications between the two groups. However, patients without fibula fixation were noted to have more wound complications (44% vs 25.9%, p = 0.108) although this was not statistically significant. In terms of removal of implant (ROI), there were no differences noted in patients with or without fibula fixation (33.3% vs 28%, p = 0.796). There were also no significant differences in ROI for those fixed with plate and screws when compared to those fixed with Rush rod and K wire within the group with fibula fixation.

CONCLUSION

Fibula fixation in the treatment of tibial pilon fractures is not routinely necessary and does not result in decreased mechanical complications such as malunion, delayed union, nonunion and implant failure. Fibula fracture fixation should be reserved for cases where it may aid reduction or provide additional stability.

Temporary circular external fixation for spanning the traumatised ankle joint: A cohort comparison study

BACKGROUND

Temporary spanning fixation aims to provide bony stability whilst allowing access and resuscitation of the traumatised soft-tissue envelope. Conventional monolateral fixators are prone to half-pin morbidity in feet, variation in construct stability and limited weight-bearing potential. This study compares traditional delta-frame monolateral external fixators to ankle spanning circular fixators.

METHODS

Two cohorts were matched for demographics and fracture patterns. The quality of initial reduction and the maintenance of reduction until definitive surgery was assessed by two authors and categorised into four domains. Secondary measures included fixator costs, time to definitive surgery and complications.

RESULTS

Fifty-five delta-frames and 51 circular fixators were statistically matched for demographics and fracture pattern. "Excellent" and "Good" initial reduction was achieved in 50 (91%) delta-frames and 51 (100%) circular fixators (p = 0.027). Deterioration of initial reduction quality was seen in 12 (22%) delta-frames and two (4%) circular fixators (p < 0.001). Post-fixator dislocation occurred in five (9%) delta-frames and one (2%) circular fixator (p = 0.147). Median duration in spanned fixation was 11 days in both groups (p = 0.114). Three (5%) delta-frames and 13 (25%) circular fixators were used as definitive fixation. The mean implant cost was 4,307 USD for delta-frames and 3747 USD for circular fixators.

CONCLUSION

Temporary spanning circular fixation offers superior intra-operative reduction and maintenance of reduction and provides more opportunity to be used as definitive fixation. Circular fixation implants also proved to be less expensive and protected against further scheduled or unscheduled returns to theatre.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective cohort study.

Outcomes of tibial pilon fracture fixation based on four-column theory

OBJECTIVES

To assess the medium-term functional and radiological outcomes, as well as injury mechanisms, fracture patterns and demographics of typical pilon fractures and pilon variant fractures treated based on the four-column theory in adults.

METHODS

A retrospective comparative study was performed. Demographics of typical pilon and pilon variant fractures, injury mechanisms, OTA/AO classification, Rüedi-Allgöwer and the four-column classification were analyzed for the cohort. Radiographic ankle arthrosis (modified Kellgren-Lawrence 3/4), Burwell Charnley Score, and AOFAS score were also analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 142 pilon fractures met the inclusion and exclusion criteria for this study, of which 77(54.23%) were females and 65 (45.77%) were males, with an average of 48 (range, 18-86)years. One hundred twenty-five posterior columns fractured in 142 pilon fractures, and the posterior columns were most prone to fractures. Ninety cases of posterior pilon fractures in 142 pilon fractures were single posterior column fractures with or without medial or lateral malleolar fractures. The average age (51, range, 18-86 years) of low-energy pilon fractures was older than the average age (42, range, 19-66 years) of high-energy pilon fractures significantly. The average time (5, range, 0-17 days) from injury to definitive internal fixation of the low-energy group was shorter than the average time (9, range, 0-21 days) from injury to definitive internal fixation of the high-energy group significantly. The average of AOFAS (87, range, 56-100) of the low-energy group is higher than the average of AOFAS (82, range, 47-100) of the high-energy group significantly. There were more male patients and more die-punch or intercalary fractures in high energy groups significantly. There were more medial and lateral malleolar fractures in low-energy groups. Compared with the non-multiple column group, the multiple-column group had more Rüedi-Allgöwer type III cases, more modified Kellgren-Lawrence 3/4 cases and lower AOFAS score significantly. However, the numbers of Burwell Charnley Score type 1 and 2 cases were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Kinds of pilon variants should be recognized. Outcomes of high-energy pilon fractures were worse than low-energy pilon fractures. The four-column theory can be applied to typical pilon fracture and pilon variants in adults.

Fusion versus fixation in complex comminuted C3-type tibial pilon fractures: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Comminuted intra-articular tibial pilon fractures can be challenging to manage, with high revision rates and poor functional outcomes. This study reviewed [1] treatment, complications, and clinical outcomes in studies of complex comminuted tibial pilon fractures (type AO43-C3); and [2] primary ankle arthrodesis as a management option for these types of complex injuries.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed on PubMed from 1990 to 2020 to determine complications and outcomes after staged fracture fixation and primary ankle joint arthrodesis for comminuted C3-type tibial pilon fractures. The search was conducted in compliance with the PRISMA guidelines, using the following MeSH terms: "tibial pilon"/"pilon fracture"/"plafond fracture"/"distal tibial"/"43-C3"/"ankle fracture"/"ankle fusion"/"primary ankle arthrodesis"/"pilon fracture staged"/"pilon external fixation" and "pilon open reduction internal fixation." Inclusion criteria were restricted to original articles in English language on adult patients ≥18 years of age. Eligibility criteria for retrieved publications were determined using a "PICO" approach (population, intervention/exposure, comparison, outcomes). Weighted analysis was used to compare treatment groups on time to definitive treatment, follow-up time, range of motion, fracture classification, and complications.

RESULTS

The systematic literature review using the defined MeSH terms yielded 72 original articles. Of these, 13 articles met the eligibility criteria based on the PICO statements, of which 8 publications investigated the outcomes of a staged fixation approach in 308 cumulative patients, and 5 articles focused on primary ankle arthrodesis in 69 cumulative patients. For staged treatment, the mean wound complication rate was 14.6%, and the malunion/nonunion rate was 9.9%. For primary arthrodesis, the mean wound complication rate was 2.9%, and the malunion/nonunion rate was 2.9%. After risk stratification for fracture type and severity, the small cumulative cohort of patients included in the primary arthrodesis publications did not provide sufficient power to determine a clinically relevant difference in complications and long-term patient outcomes compared to the staged surgical fixation group.

CONCLUSIONS

At present, there is insufficient evidence in the published literature to provide guidance towards consideration of ankle arthrodesis for complex comminuted C3-type tibial pilon fractures, compared to the standard treatment by staged surgical fracture fixation.

Large autologous ilium with periosteum for tibiotalar joint reconstruction in Rüedi-Allgöwer III or AO/OTA type C3 pilon fractures: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Management of Rüedi-Allgöwer III or AO/OTA type C3 pilon fracture presents numerous challenges to the orthopaedic surgeon. A joint preservation technique using a large autologous ilium with periosteum in combination with internal implant fixation was reported to improve the outcome of reconstruction.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients according to Tscherne/Oestern FxCO-I closed fracture and FxOI open fractures classification after Rüedi-Allgöwer III or AO/OTA type C3 pilon fracture received a large autologous ilium with periosteum for tibiotalar joint reconstruction and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), between March 2015 and September 2018. The visual analog scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and Burwell and Charnley criteria were used for outcome analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty patients with an average age of 45.2 years were followed for an average of 18.3 months. The VAS and AOFAS scores, and Burwell and Charnley ratings were recorded at the last follow-up after reconstructive surgery. Two patients developed redness and swelling at the wound site, but recovered after local care and dressing changes. No patient displayed deep surgical site infection, donor site complication, non-union or local complication during the final follow-up. The average bone union time was 18.3 months (range 3-36).

CONCLUSIONS

Large autologous ilium with periosteum in combination with ORIF can be performed for tibiotalar joint reconstruction. This experimental procedure reduces the risk of post-operative complications following articular reconstruction for Rüedi-Allgöwer III or AO/OTA type C3 pilon fractures in short follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Anterolateral distal tibia locking plate osteosynthesis and their ability to capture OTAC3 pilon fragments

BACKGROUND

Intra-articular Pilon fractures remain therapeutically challenging due to osteochondral fracturing and comminution, marginal impaction, and insult to the soft tissue envelope. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of anterolateral distal tibial locking plates in capturing main fracture fragments in tibial plafond fractures.

METHODS

From May 2011 to Dec 2015, 169 OTA C-type pilon fractures met inclusion and exclusion criteria with computed tomographic (CT) scans performed prior to definitive fixation. For each patient, the fracture lines were mapped, digitized, and graphically superimposed to create a compilation of fracture lines. Based on these average measurements, three distal tibia sawbones had three different anterolateral plates applied. Axial CT scan images were used to determine the efficacy of screw purchase in main fracture fragments in pilon fractures.

RESULTS

The Smith & Nephew PERI-LOC plate secured the largest number of fracture lines (90.1%) but missed the Volkmann fragment with greatest frequency at 3.6%. The Synthes 2.7/3.5 mm VA-LCP captured 87.3% of the fracture lines while missing the Volkmann fragment 3.2% of the time. The Synthes 3.5 mm LCP captured 86.5% of the fracture lines but was the best at securing the Volkmann fragment (1.2% missed). All three implants were deficient in capturing the medial malleolar fragment. The PERI-LOC and 2.7/3.5 mm VA-LCP did not differ with respect to percentage of fragments captured (p = 0.721) but both outperformed the 3.5 mm LCP (p = 0.021 and p = 0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This study was consistent with prior literature in defining three main fracture fragments: anterior, medial, and posterior. All three plates were deficient in capturing the medial malleolar fragment. The Smith and Nephew PERI-LOC plate secured the most number of fracture lines, while the Synthes 3.5 mm LCP was least likely to miss the Volkmann fragment and most likely to miss the medial malleolar fragment. No plate was found to be superior to the other in capturing all fracture lines of the OTAC3 pilon fragments.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Three.

[Tibial pilon fractures : Advoidance and therapy of complications]

Because of the complex fracture morphology and vulnerable soft tissue coverage, fractures of the tibial pilon are difficult to treat. Complications are more common than in bi- or trimalleolar fractures. The surgeon has to know about the special risks of these injuries to avoid complications. Early complications are soft tissue necrosis, persisting fragment dislocations after surgery, loss of reposition and deep wound infection. The surgeon has to be aware of early signs of compartment-syndrome and chronic regional pain syndrome (CRPS). In late complications such as bony necrosis with or without deviation, non-union and osteoarthrosis of the ankle joint give the surgeon more time for planning the therapy. Intensive monitoring until bone healing is necessary in tibial pilon fractures to detect complications early and start the therapy immediately. This kind of therapy results in the best outcome for these patients.

Minimally invasive treatment of tibial pilon fractures through arthroscopy and external fixator-assisted reduction

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of tibial pilon fractures treated with arthroscopy and assisted reduction with an external fixator.

Methods

Thirteen patients with tibial pilon fractures underwent assisted reduction for limited lower internal fixation with an external fixator under arthroscopic guidance. The weight-bearing time was decided on the basis of repeat radiography of the tibia 3 months after surgery. Postoperative ankle function was evaluated according to the Mazur scoring system.

Results

Healing of fractures was achieved in all cases, with no complications such as severe infection, skin necrosis, or an exposed plate. There were 9 excellent, 2 good, and 2 poor outcomes, scored according to the Mazur system. The acceptance rate was 85%.

Conclusion

Arthroscopy and external fixator-assisted reduction for the minimally invasive treatment of tibial pilon fractures not only produced less trauma but also protected the soft tissues and blood supply surrounding the fractures. External fixation could indirectly provide reduction and effective operative space for arthroscopic implantation, especially for AO type B fractures and partial AO type C1 fractures.