Improved temporal resolution and acceleration on 4D-MR angiography based on superselective pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling combined with CENTRA-keyhole and view-sharing (4D-S-PACK) using an interpolation algorithm on the temporal axis and compressed sensing-sensitivity encoding (CS-SENSE)

PURPOSE

Two major drawbacks of 4D-MR angiography based on superselective pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling combined with CENTRA-keyhole and view-sharing (4D-S-PACK) are the low temporal resolution and long scanning time. We investigated the feasibility of increasing the temporal resolution and accelerating the scanning time on 4D-S-PACK by using CS-SENSE and PhyZiodynamics, a novel image-processing program that interpolates images between phases to generate new phases and reduces image noise.

METHODS

Seven healthy volunteers were scanned with a 3.0 T MR scanner to visualize the internal carotid artery (ICA) system. PhyZiodynamics is a novel image-processing that interpolates images between phases to generate new phases and reduces image noise, and by increasing temporal resolution using PhyZiodynamics, inflow dynamic data (reference) were acquired by changing the labeling durations (100-2000 msec, 31 phases) in 4D-S-PACK. From this set of data, we selected seven time intervals to calculate interpolated time points with up to 61 intervals using ×10 for the generation of interpolated phases with PhyZiodynamics. In the denoising process of PhyZiodynamics, we processed the none, low, medium, high noise reduction dataset images. The time intensity curve (TIC), the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were evaluated. In accelerating with CS-SENSE for 4D-S-PACK, 4D-S-PACK were scanned different SENSE or CS-SENSE acceleration factors: SENSE3, CS3-6. Signal intensity (SI), CNR, were evaluated for accelerating the 4D-S-PACK. With regard to arterial vascular visualization, we evaluated the middle cerebral artery (MCA: M1-4 segments).

RESULTS

In increasing temporal resolution, the TIC showed a similar trend between the reference dataset and the interpolated dataset. As the noise reduction weight increased, the CNR of the interpolated dataset were increased compared to that of the reference dataset. In accelerating 4D-S-PACK, the SI values of the SENSE3 dataset and CS dataset with CS3-6 were no significant differences. The image noise increased with the increase of acceleration factor, and the CNR decreased with the increase of acceleration factor. Significant differences in CNR were observed between acceleration factor of SENSE3 and CS6 for the M1-4 (P < 0.05). Visualization of small arteries (M4) became less reliable in CS5 or CS6 images. Significant differences were found for the scores of M2, M3 and M4 segments between SENSE3 and CS6.

CONCLUSION

With PhyZiodynamics and CS-SENSE in 4D-S-PACK, we were able to shorten the scan time while improving the temporal resolution.

MR Angiography: Contrast-Enhanced Acquisition Techniques

Contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) is a frequently used MR imaging technique for evaluating cardiovascular structures. In many ways, it is similar to contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) angiography, except a gadolinium-based contrast agent (instead of iodinated contrast) is injected. Although the physiological principles of contrast injection overlap, the technical factors behind enhancement and image acquisition are different. CE-MRA provides an excellent alternative to CT for vascular evaluation and follow-up without requiring nephrotoxic contrast and ionizing radiation. This review describes the physical principles, limitations, and technical applications of CE-MRA techniques.

Optimization of 4D-MR angiography based on superselective pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling combined with CENTRA-keyhole and view-sharing (4D-S-PACK) for vessel-selective visualization of the internal carotid artery and vertebrobasilar artery systems

PURPOSE

This study investigated the optimal labeling position and gradient moment for 4D-MR angiography based on superselective pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling combined with CENTRA-keyhole and view-sharing (4D-S-PACK) for vessel-selective flow visualization of the internal carotid artery (ICA) and vertebrobasilar artery (VBA) systems.

METHODS

Seven healthy volunteers were scanned with a 3.0 T MR scanner. To visualize the ICA system, the labeling focus was placed in the right ICA at 55, 75 and 95 mm below the imaging slab. To visualize the VBA system, the labeling focus was placed in the basilar artery (BA), upper vertebral artery (VA upper), and lower vertebral artery (VA lower). Two sizes of labeling focus were created using gradient moments of 0.5 and 0.75 mT/m ms. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was measured in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) and posterior cerebral artery (PCA) branches.

RESULTS

CNRs increased as the distance between the center of the imaging slab and the labeling position decreased in all MCA segments. CNRs obtained with VA lower tended to be higher than those obtained with BA and VA upper in all PCA segments. Selective vessel visualization was achieved with the gradient moment of 0.75 mT/m ms for the ICA and VBA system.

CONCLUSION

The optimal 4D-S-PACK gradient moment was found to be 0.75 mT/m ms for the ICA and VBA systems. When visualizing the ICA system, the labeling position should be placed as close as possible to the imaging slab. When visualizing the VBA system, the labeling position should be placed at VA lower .

Utility of dynamic MRA in the evaluation of male erectile dysfunction

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy of time-resolved MR angiography (MRA) in evaluating penile vasculature in patients with clinically suspected vascular anomalies contributing to their erectile dysfunction correlating with penile doppler ultrasound (PDUS) findings and clinical outcomes after surgical intervention.

METHODS

Men (n = 26) with signs of early vascular shunting on PDUS underwent time-resolved, contrast-enhanced (0.1 mMol/kg gadobutrol at 1 ml/s followed by saline flush) 3-dimensional spoiled gradient echo T1-weighted MRA sequence performed over 3 min with 4.6 s frame rate after intracavernosal injection of an erectogenic agent. Additional T1- and T2-weighted sequences were performed for anatomic co-localization and tissue characterization. MRA images were evaluated for early filling of draining veins as well as arteriovenous malformations and fistulas and correlated with findings at surgery.

RESULTS

29 MRA examinations on 26 patients (mean age 39 years) demonstrated abnormal early venous drainage (n = 22) as well as diminutive/delayed cavernosal enhancement (n = 3), incomplete tumescence (n = 2), and combined arterial inflow/venous outflow disease (n = 1). The MRA had a concordance of 85.2% at determining the presence, or lack thereof of a shunt/AVM when compared to PDUS.

CONCLUSIONS

Time-resolved MRA allows for both temporal and spatial resolution with visualization of both arterial and venous abnormalities which may be suggested with a screening PDUS examination. This technique allows us to provide detailed anatomic information prior to any surgical intervention.

Feasibility of non-contrast-enhanced four dimensional (4D) MRA in head and neck tumors, comparison with contrast-enhanced 4D MRA

BACKGROUND

Information of tumor vascular architecture and hemodynamics is important in treating patients with head and neck tumors (HNTs). The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility of non-contrast-enhanced four-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography (non-CE 4DMRA) using arterial spin labeling for anatomical and hemodynamic evaluation of vascularity of head and neck tumors.

RESULTS

Non-CE 4DMRA images of 15 patients with HNTs were compared with those of contrast-enhanced 4DMRA (CE 4DMRA) by two independent observers. For qualitative evaluation, overall image quality, visualization of arterial branches and main arterial tumor feeders were assessed. For hemodynamic evaluation, signal-intensity-over-time curves within the tumors were compared. The sensitivity of non-CE 4DMRA for the identification of arterial branches and the main arterial tumor feeders was 75 and 20 %, respectively (interobserver agreement, κ = 0.56 and 0.54, respectively), while that of CE 4DMRA was 99 and 95 %, respectively (interobserver agreement, κ = 0.62 and 0.70, respectively). All three arterial/hypervascularized tumors determined on CE 4DMRA showed distinct signal-intensity-over-time curve pattern on non-CE 4DMRA, with distinct peak and wash out phases. Other tumors showed no wash out on non-CE 4DMRA.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of non-CE 4DMRA for the anatomical and hemodynamic evaluation of vascularity of head and neck tumors is feasible, although the technique needs to be improved.

Recent advances in brain and spine imaging

Advanced MR imaging techniques have found extensive utility in the clinical practice of neuroradiology. A variety of these techniques are incorporated into imaging protocols for routine use, specific applications to particular disease entities, or as problem-solving tools on an ad hoc basis. This article summarizes and illustrates the spectrum of advanced MR imaging tools used clinically in the practice of neuroradiology.

Time-resolved 3D contrast-enhanced MRA on 3.0T: a non-invasive follow-up technique after stent-assisted coil embolization of the intracranial aneurysm

Objective

To evaluate the usefulness of time-resolved contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (4D MRA) after stent-assisted coil embolization by comparing it with time of flight (TOF)-MRA.

Materials and Methods

TOF-MRA and 4D MRA were obtained by 3T MRI in 26 patients treated with stent-assisted coil embolization (Enterprise:Neuroform = 7:19). The qualities of the MRA were rated on a graded scale of 0 to 4. We classified completeness of endovascular treatment into three categories. The degree of quality of visualization of the stented artery was compared between TOF and 4D MRA by the Wilcoxon signed rank test. We used the Mann-Whitney U test for comparing the quality of the visualization of the stented artery according to the stent type in each MRA method.

Results

The quality in terms of the visualization of the stented arteries in 4D MRA was significantly superior to that in 3D TOF-MRA, regardless of type of the stent (p < 0.001). The quality of the arteries which were stented with Neuroform was superior to that of the arteries stented with Enterprise in 3D TOF (p < 0.001) and 4D MRA (p = 0.008), respectively.

Conclusion

4D MRA provides a higher quality view of the stented parent arteries when compared with TOF.