Awake transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy in an ambulatory surgery center: early clinical outcomes and complications of 100 patients

PURPOSE

Transforaminal endoscopic discectomy has been found to have equivalent outcomes to traditional discectomy techniques. Controversy exists concerning whether this should be performed under general anesthetic with neuromonitoring or can be safely performed on awake patients without neuromonitoring. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of awake transforaminal endoscopic discectomy in an ambulatory setting.

METHODS

100 consecutive patients with lumbar disc herniations treated with transforaminal endoscopic discectomy by a single surgeon were enrolled in the study. All procedures were performed under conscious sedation with local anesthetic. Preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores were recorded and compared. Time spent in recovery prior to discharge home and complications were also recorded.

RESULTS

Average VAS score improved from a mean of 6.85 to 0.74 (median 7 to 0) immediately postoperatively. The average time spent in Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) prior to discharge was 56.7 min. Average VAS score at 2 weeks was 3.07 (median 2.5). Complication rates were commensurate with published results in the literature. The most common complication was radiculitis, which appears to be more likely with foraminal/extraforaminal herniations at a rate of 20.7%, versus 2.6% for central/paracentral herniations. There were no cases that required conversion to general anesthetic or transfer to a hospital and no permanent nerve injuries in this cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic discectomy can safely and successfully be performed in an ambulatory surgery center under conscious sedation and local anesthetic without neuromonitoring. This procedure leads to rapid recovery in the PACU and significantly improved VAS scores postoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Tubular Microdiscectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Valuable Alternative to Endoscopic Techniques

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy of tubular microdiscectomy (TMD) in the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation (rLDH) is still unclear, especially compared with the endoscopic technique. We performed a retrospective study to analyze this question.

METHODS

We retrospectively included all patients with an rLDH confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging who underwent TMD between January 2012 and February 2019. The general data included sex, age, body mass index, level of rLDH, first surgical approach, reoperation interval, occurrence of dural leak, re-recurrence, and re-reoperation. The clinical outcome was evaluated using a visual analog scale for leg pain, and the modified MacNab criteria were used to evaluate patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

The visual analog scale score for leg pain was statistically significantly reduced from 7.46 preoperatively to 0.80 postoperatively (P < 0.00001), and the patient satisfaction was good or excellent in 85.7% of cases, according to the modified MacNab criteria. Complications occurred in 3 of the 15 included patients: 2 dural tears (13.3%) and 2 re-recurrence (13.3%), but none of the patients underwent a third surgical procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

TMD seems to be an efficient technique for the surgical treatment of leg pain caused by rLDH. In the literature, this technique seems to be at least as good as the endoscopic technique and is easier to master.

Evaluation of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) and open fenestration discectomy (OFD) in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH).

METHODS

Patients in our hospital with LDH who received PTED (n = 71) and OFD (n = 39) from 2013 to 2014 were retrospectively studied. Patient information, including age, gender, visual analogue scale (VAS) score for low back pain and leg pain, body weight, height, Oswestry disability index (ODI), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), and recurrence, was collected. The patients in the two groups were followed up for an average of 63 months after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 136 patients completed the operation and 110 patients were followed up completely. There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups (P > 0.05). The postoperative low back pain, leg pain, ODI, and JOA of the two groups were better than those preoperatively (P < 0.05). One week after surgery, the recovery of PTED patients was better than that of OFD. The ODI score of the PTED group was lower than that of the OFD group (10 [8, 12] vs 14 [11, 16]; P < 0.05), the waist VAS score of the PTED group was lower than that of the OFD group (2 [2, 3] vs 3 [2, 4]; P < 0.05), the leg VAS score of the PTED group was lower than that of the OFD group (1 [0,1] vs 1 [1, 2]; P < 0.05), while the JOA score of the PTED group was higher than that of OFD group [19(16, 20) vs 12(10, 17); P < 0.05]. There were no significant differences in ODI, JOA, waist and leg VAS scores between the two groups at 1 month after surgery and at subsequent follow-up (P > 0.05). At the end of the follow up, 89.7% (35/39) of patients in the OFD group had excellent improvement in the JOA score, and 88.7% (63/71) of patients in the PTED group had an excellent improvement. There was no significant difference between the two (P > 0.05). There was also no significant difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups [(5/71) vs (3/39); P > 0.05]. [Correction added on 05 March 2021, after first online publication: "3/29" was amended to "3/39" in the preceding sentence.] CONCLUSION: Both PTED and OFD can achieve good mid-term efficacy in the treatment of LDH but PTED has certain advantages, including the small incision, a shorter hospital stay, and quicker, earlier recovery. However, prospective randomized controlled studies with a larger sample size are needed.

Stepwise Local Anesthesia for Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy: Technique Strategy and Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Due to suboptimal pain control under conventional local anesthesia, percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy is typically performed under general anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to develop a stepwise approach of local anesthesia for endoscopic interlaminar discectomy and evaluate its efficacy.

METHODS

A stepwise local anesthesia was developed, which mainly includes 3 steps: conventional local anesthesia from skin to laminae, epidural injection, and nerve root block. From June 2015 to May 2017, consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic interlaminar discectomy were included. Local anesthesia or general anesthesia was used based on patients' preference. Anesthetic effectiveness was evaluated as excellent, good, or poor, and adverse events were recorded. Hospitalization expense was compared between the 2 groups. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale and the Oswestry Disability Index.

RESULTS

There were 98 patients included in the study. Among them, 48 received stepwise local anesthesia and the other 50 received general anesthesia. In the stepwise local anesthesia group, 40 (83.3%) patients rated anesthetic effectiveness as excellent, 7 (14.6%) as good, and 1 (2.1%) as poor. Nine patients had complications that may be associated with local anesthesia, including dyspnea, temporary paresis of legs, and temporary worsened dysesthesia or numbness in legs. After surgery, the patients' leg pain and Oswestry Disability Index significantly improved in both groups. On average, hospitalization expense was approximately 20% less when local anesthesia was used, as compared with using general anesthesia.

CONCLUSIONS

The stepwise local anesthesia can achieve satisfactory pain control and seems to be a good choice for endoscopic interlaminar discectomy.

Revisional percutaneous full endoscopic disc surgery for recurrent herniation of previous open lumbar discectomy. Asian Spine J. 2011;5:1-9. [PMID: 21386940 PMCID: PMC3047892 DOI: 10.4184/asj.2011.5.1.1]

Study Design

A retrospective study.

Purpose

To determine the feasibility and effectiveness of revisional percutaneous full endoscopic discectomy for recurrent herniation after conventional open disc surgery.

Overview of the Literature

Repeated open discectomy with or without fusion has been the most common procedure for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for recurrent herniation has been thought of as an impossible procedure. Despite good results with open revisional surgery, major problems may be caused by injuries to the posterior stabilized structures. Our team did revisional full endoscopic lumbar disc surgery on the basis of our experience doing primary full endoscopic disc surgery.

Methods

Between February 2004 and August 2009 a total of 41 patients in our hospital underwent revisional percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy using a YESS endoscopic system and a micro-osteotome (designed by the authors). Indications for surgery were recurrent disc herniation following conventional open discectomy; with compression of the nerve root revealed by Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; corresponding radiating pain which was not alleviated after conservative management over 6 weeks. Patients with severe neurologic deficits and isolated back pain were excluded.

Results

The mean follow-up period was 16 months (range, 13 to 42 months). The visual analog scale for pain in the leg and back showed significant post-treatment improvement (p < 0.001). Based on a modified version of MacNab's criteria, 90.2% showed excellent or good outcomes. There was no measurable blood loss. There were two cases of recurrence of and four cases with complications.

Conclusions

Percutaneous full-endoscopic revisional disc surgery without additional structural damage is feasible and effective in terms of there being less chance of fusion and bleeding. This technique can be an alternative to conventional repeated discectomy.