Hypertrophic pachymeningitis due to IgG4-related disease (RD-IgG4). A case report

INTRODUCTION

Hypertrophic pachymeningitis (HP) is a clinico-radiological entity characterized by a thickening of the dura mater that may be focal or diffuse and manifested by a variety of neurological syndromes. Aetiologically, it is classified as infectious, neoplastic, autoimmune, and idiopathic. Many of these formerly idiopathic cases have been shown to fall into the spectrum of IgG4-related disease.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the case of a patient attended for neurological involvement due to hypertrophic pachymeningitis with initial diagnosis of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour and final diagnosis of IgG4-related disease.

CASE

A 25-year-old woman with neurological symptoms of 3 years' evolution characterized initially by right hypoacusis, evolving with headache and diplopia. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the encephalon showed pachymeningeal thickening with involvement of vasculo-nervous structures in the tip of the cerebellum, cavernous sinus, ragged foramen, and optic chiasm. The patient presented for consultation with the result of an incisional biopsy that reported a proliferative lesion combining fibrous elements of fascicular or swirling arrangement with collagenized streaks with dense, lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate and some macrophages, with negative staining for ALK 1, with a diagnosis of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour. Due to suspicion of IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) the biopsy was sent for review and pertinent complementary studies were requested.

BIOPSY REVIEW

Non storiform fibrosis, predominantly lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate, histiocytes, and polymorphonuclear infiltrate in sectors, without granulomas or atypia. Staining for germs negative. Immunohistochemistry with 50-60 IgG4+/HPF cells and range of 15%-20%, CD68⁺ in histiocytes, CD1a^-, S100^-. The patient presented deterioration of visual acuity due to ophthalmic nerve involvement, so glucocorticoid treatment was started in pulses and rituximab with regression of symptoms and imaging improvement of the lesions.

CONCLUSION

HP is a clinical imaging syndrome with variable symptoms and aetiologies that poses a diagnostic challenge. In this case the initial diagnosis was inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour, which is a neoplasm of variable behaviour, locally aggressive, and can metastasize; it is one of the main differential diagnoses of IgG4-related disease because they share anatomopathological features, including storiform fibrosis. IgG4-RD is an immune-mediated condition that can have single or multiple involvement. Its diagnosis is complex when it presents with single organ involvement or in non-typical organs (CNS, meninges) in which data are scarce, as in the case of our patient with single organ involvement of the CNS. Although there are classification criteria to guide non-specialists in the diagnosis, the sum of the clinical picture, imaging, laboratory, pathological anatomy, and immunohistochemistry will always be evaluated together for a definitive diagnosis.

Inflammatory pseudotumor and myofibroblastic inflammatory tumor. Diagnostic criteria and prognostic differences

INTRODUCTION

Inflammatory pseudotumor (IPT) and inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) are two very rare entities that were formerly included in the same category; however, today they are considered two different diseases due to the neoplastic origin of the IMT. Our objective is to share our experience in the management of these two types of tumors that we must take into account in the differential diagnosis of pulmonary masses or nodules.

METHODS

Thirteen patients with a pathological diagnosis of IPT and IMT who underwent surgery between 2008 and 2019 were retrospectively studied. We recorded the pre and postoperative information of each one, as well as the survival analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 13 patients, 8 were men and 5 women. The mean age of presentation was 53,5 years. An atypical segmentectomy was performed in 6 patients; a lobectomy was necessary in 6 and a pneumonectomy in 1 case. In all cases a complete resection was achieved. Diagnosis was possible thanks to histology, immunohistochemical (IHQ) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques determining the expression of IgG4 and the rearrangement of ALK, respectively. After a median follow up of 49 months, we didn't find any loco-regional or distant recurrence in the patients studied.

CONCLUSION

IPT and IMT are rare tumors with a very good prognostic. The diagnosis of both entities is based mainly on specific anatomopathological techniques. Surgery has, in most cases, both a diagnostic and therapeutic role.

[Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour of the vocal cord. A case report and revision of the literature]

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour (IMT) is a rare entity that can occur in practically any location. Although it has an increased incidence in infancy and adolescence, cases of IMT in the head and neck are more frequent in adults. We report the case of a 74-year-old male who presented with a two month history of dysphonia. Laryngoscopy and cervical TAC revealed a nodular lesion affecting the anterior half of the left vocal cord. He underwent endoscopic laser cordectomy. Histopathology concluded that the lesion was an IMT. Cases of IMT in the head and neck are infrequent and in the vocal cord extremely rare, with only a few previously reported cases.

Inflammatory pseudotumor and myofibroblastic inflammatory tumor. Diagnostic criteria and prognostic differences

INTRODUCTION

Inflammatory pseudotumor (IPT) and inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) are two very rare entities that were formerly included in the same category; however, today they are considered two different diseases due to the neoplastic origin of the IMT. Our objective is to share our experience in the management of these two types of tumors that we must take into account in the differential diagnosis of pulmonary masses or nodules.

METHODS

Thirteen patients with a pathological diagnosis of IPT and IMT who underwent surgery between 2008 and 2019 were retrospectively studied. We recorded the pre and postoperative information of each one, as well as the survival analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 13 patients, 8 were men and 5 women. The mean age of presentation was 53,5 years. An atypical segmentectomy was performed in 6 patients; a lobectomy was necessary in 6 and a pneumonectomy in 1 case. In all cases a complete resection was achieved. Diagnosis was possible thanks to histology, immunohistochemical (IHQ) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques determining the expression of IgG4 and the rearrangement of ALK, respectively. After a median follow up of 49 months, we didńt find any loco-regional or distant recurrence in the patients studied.

CONCLUSION

IPT and IMT are rare tumors with a very good prognostic. The diagnosis of both entities is based mainly on specific anatomopathological techniques. Surgery has, in most cases, both a diagnostic and therapeutic role.

Paraneoplastic pemphigus as a first sign of metastatic retroperitoneal inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: (18)F-FDG PET/CT findings

A 30-year-old female presented with a 3-month history of erosive stomatitis and bullous lesions, along with recurrent episodes of abdominal pain. She was found to have a retroperitoneal lump in left lumbar region. Skin biopsy revealed bullous disorder. CT guided biopsy of the retroperitoneal mass was suggestive of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT). She was started on oral steroids and supportive care, and surgery was being planned when she developed respiratory failure. CT chest revealed vertebral metastases. PET/CT for whole body work up revealed a left para-aortic mass along with multiple skeletal metastases. The patient was kept on conservative management. After 3 months, the patient has shown clinical improvement, and an exploratory laparotomy is now being planned for the excision of the tumor, followed by chemotherapy. This case of retroperitoneal IMT is rare in terms of skeletal metastases with paraneoplastic pemphigus.