Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) among Lebanese adults: unidentified IBS and associated factors

BACKGROUND

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is one of the most frequent functional gastrointestinal disorders, but the condition is still underdiagnosed. The high of rate of unidentified IBS by patients can be related to different factors. The aim of this study is to assess the rate of unidentified IBS among Lebanese adults and investigate the role of socio-demographic factors, anxiety, depression, insomnia and eating attitudes on IBS diagnosis.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted among Lebanese adults older than 18 years between June 2022 and December 2022, using a self-reporting questionnaire distributed via social media.

RESULTS

A total of 425 participants was enrolled in the study with around 184 (46.8%) having a possible unidentified IBS. Higher psychological distress (aOR = 1.07) and insomnia severity (aOR = 1.08) were significantly associated with higher odds of having possible unidentified IBS whereas a higher household crowding index (aOR = 0.67) was significantly associated with lower odds of having possible IBS. The correlation of eating attitudes with cigarette smoking (aOR = 1.33; p = .025; 95% CI 1.04; 1.70) and insomnia severity with cigarette smoking (aOR = .89; p = .023; 95% CI .80; .98) were significantly associated with the presence of possible IBS. In nonsmokers, higher psychological distress (aOR = 1.07) and insomnia severity (aOR = 1.10) were significantly associated with higher odds of having possible IBS. In smokers, higher BMI (aOR = .78) was significantly associated with lower odds of having possible IBS, whereas higher eating attitudes scores (more inappropriate eating) (aOR = 1.40) were significantly associated with higher odds of having possible IBS.

CONCLUSION

The study highlighted the implication of raising awareness about IBS among the Lebanese population to promote early diagnosis and minimize the rate of unidentified IBS by patients. Initiation of appropriate treatment plans, tailored symptomatic management approach, and diet programs should be highly encouraged.

Management of unidentified and unclaimed bodies: a comparison of model from four countries in the Asia Pacific Region

Managing mass fatality incidents or disasters involving multiple deaths are not uncommon among forensic practitioners. In fact, management of unidentified or unknown bodies is also a vital component of the day-to-day mortuary work practice. The unidentified and subsequently unclaimed bodies have always been a "silent mass disaster," a problem that needs to be tackled within the forensic community and raises the global issue of ethics, law, and human rights. Unidentified bodies' in Malaysia make up an average of 4.02% of all death cases where a total postmortem examination was performed which is comparable with other developing countries within 4-10% which can go up to 25%. Moreover, unstandardized procedures in all mortuaries in different states and districts in Malaysia have worsened the scenario even with guidelines in place. This study aims to address the issues surrounding unidentified and unclaimed bodies including body disposal from a social and legal perspective using case study methodology by comparing four different countries in the Asia Pacific Region through document analysis and interview methods. One of the major findings is evident in 3 out of the 4 models, whereby there is a considerable gap in consolidating the missing person report and information to match with the unidentified bodies received in forensic institutions in an attempt to enhance the identification process which ultimately intends as a closure for the family members. It is also timely to think out of the box beyond dental records and DNA profiling to improve the identification rate for skeletonized remains through means of anthropology biometrics comparison. With the limited literature published surrounding this domain, it is hoped that the suggestions and recommendations to standardize the management of unidentified and unclaimed bodies can benefit many forensic institutions and public mortuaries in this region.

Technical note: Next generation identification - A powerful tool in cold case investigations

Ever changing technology is allowing law enforcement/crime laboratories the ability to use new advances to solve old cases. Exonerations through advances in DNA testing have become increasingly common. However, other forensic disciplines are also utilizing new technologies, which are providing investigative leads and case closures. One advancement is the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Next Generation Identification (NGI) biometric system, which has enhanced the field of print identification. The Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation (OSBI) Latent Evidence Unit is utilizing NGI to assist in solving "Cold Cases." While the OSBI cold case project has been successful, reviewing old evidence and case files, while keeping up with current casework, can be challenging. However, the recognition and application of such powerful technology is warranted, as demonstrated by the success that has been achieved.

What's in a Name? Provider Perception of Injured John Doe Patients

BACKGROUND

We previously demonstrated that unidentified aliased patients, John Doe's (DOEs), are one of the highest risk and most medically fragile populations of injured patients. Aliasing can result in misplaced information and confusion that must be overcome by health care professionals. DOE alias use is institutionally dependent and not uniform, which may lead to significant variation in perception of confusion and error. We sought to determine if health care practitioners experience confusion that may result in compromised care when caring for injured DOE patients.

METHODS

After obtaining institutional review board approval, we surveyed critical care nurses, nurse practitioners, resident physicians, and surgeons who care for DOE patients at two academic level I trauma centers with separate DOE alias practices. Surveys asked whether caring for DOE patients created possible or actual confusion and possible or actual patient care errors. In one institution (Selective DOE), only unidentified patients were given an alias that was reconciled when information became available. At the other institution (All DOE), all trauma patients were admitted with an alias that was reconciled within 24 h. Respondents were invited to complete an anonymous questionnaire regarding the care for DOE patients. Results were analyzed with Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and significance was assessed at a level of 0.05.

RESULTS

Of 176 total respondents, 120 (68.2%) reported from Selective DOE and 56 (31.8%) from All DOE. Overall 53.1% reported that DOE use can cause serious confusion. Specifically, 31.3% reported experiencing actual confusion, although only 4% reported actual errors. Nurses had significantly higher perceived risk of confusion in the system of All DOE versus Selective DOE assignment (17.9% versus 4.2%, P < 0.01). Resident physicians reported significantly more frequent actual mistakes within the All DOE versus Selective DOE (24.1% versus 6.6%, P < 0.01), despite finding no significant difference in resident perception of confusion (21.4% versus 12.5%, respectively, P = 0.18).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study sheds light on clinical consequences of EMR use and aliases for end users. We show that nurses perceive that there are greater potential complications associated with DOE aliases use, and this varies depending on the system used for managing unidentified patients. Minimizing DOE alias use may help to minimize provider confusion, risk for error, and patient safety.