1
|
Yaxley J, Scott T. Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis. Nefrologia 2023; 43:293-301. [PMID: 36517362 DOI: 10.1016/j.nefroe.2022.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal dialysis is an important form of kidney replacement therapy. Most patients presenting with an unplanned, urgent need for dialysis are prescribed haemodialysis, leading to peritoneal dialysis underutilisation. Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis refers to treatment that is commenced within 2 weeks of catheter placement. Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis represents an efficacious, cost-effective alternative to the conventional approach of commencing dialysis. There is a paucity of evidence to guide management, however experience with the technique is increasing. This article overviews the rationale and practical application of urgent-start peritoneal dialysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Yaxley
- Department of Nephrology, Cairns Hospital, Cairns, Queensland, Australia; Department of Nephrology, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Tahira Scott
- Department of Nephrology, Cairns Hospital, Cairns, Queensland, Australia; Department of Nephrology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kim JH, Kim MJ, Ye BM, Kim JH, Kim MJ, Kim S, Kim IY, Kim HJ, Han M, Rhee H, Song SH, Seong EY, Lee SB, Lee DW. Percutaneous peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation with no break-in period: A viable option for patients requiring unplanned urgent-start peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Res Clin Pract 2020; 39:365-372. [PMID: 32759467 PMCID: PMC7530356 DOI: 10.23876/j.krcp.20.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2020] [Revised: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (PD) is applied to patients who need PD within two weeks but are able to wait for more than 48 hours before starting PD. To evaluate the usefulness of percutaneous PD catheter insertion in urgent-start PD, we reviewed the clinical outcomes of percutaneous catheter insertion with immediate start PD and surgical insertion with longer break-in time in Pusan National University Hospital. Methods This study included 177 patients who underwent urgent-start PD. Based on the PD catheter insertion techniques, the patients with urgent-start PD were divided into percutaneous (n = 103) and surgical (n = 74) groups. For the percutaneous group, a modified Seldinger percutaneous catheter insertion with immediate initiation of continuous ambulatory PD was performed by nephrologists. Results The percutaneous group showed higher serum urea nitrogen, creatinine, and lower serum albumin compared with the surgical group (P < 0.05). Ninety-day infectious and mechanical complications showed no significant differences between the two groups. Ninety-day peritonitis in the percutaneous group was 9.7% compared to 5.4% in the surgical group (P = not significant [NS]). Major leakage was 3.9% in the percutaneous group compared to 1.4% in the surgical group (P = NS). Overall infectious and mechanical complication-free survival was not significantly different between the two groups. The percutaneous group and surgical group showed no statistical difference with respect to catheter survival over the entire observation period (P = NS). Conclusion This study suggests that urgent-start PD can be applied safely with percutaneous catheter insertion by nephrologists with no break-in period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joo Hui Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.,Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Min Jeong Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gimhae Bokum Hospital, Gimhae, Republic of Korea
| | - Byung-Min Ye
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.,Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
| | - June Hyun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.,Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Min Jeong Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.,Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Seorin Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.,Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Il Young Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.,Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyo Jin Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.,Division of Nephrology, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Miyeun Han
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.,Division of Nephrology, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Harin Rhee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.,Division of Nephrology, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Heon Song
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.,Division of Nephrology, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun Young Seong
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.,Division of Nephrology, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Soo Bong Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.,Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Won Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.,Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Phang CC, Foo MWY, Johnson DW, Wu SY, Hao Y, Jayaballa M, Koniman R, Chan CM, Oei EL, Chong TT, Htay H. Comparison of outcomes of urgent-start and conventional-start peritoneal dialysis: a single-centre experience. Int Urol Nephrol 2020; 53:583-590. [PMID: 32895864 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-020-02630-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been a growing interest in urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (PD) in patients with end-stage kidney disease to avoid central venous catheter use and its complications. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between urgent-start PD (defined as PD commencement within 2 weeks of PD catheter insertion) and conventional-start PD. METHODS This was a single-centre retrospective cohort study of all incident PD patients at Singapore General Hospital between January 2017 and February 2018. The primary outcome was dialysate leak. Secondary outcomes included catheter malfunction, catheter readjustment, exit-site infection, peritonitis, technique and patient survival. RESULTS A total of 187 incident PD patients were included. Of these, 66 (35%) initiated urgent-start PD. Dialysate leak was significantly higher in urgent-start PD compared with conventional-start PD groups (7.6% versus 0.8%; p = 0.02) whilst catheter malfunction (4.5% vs. 3.3%; p = 0.70) and catheter readjustment (1.5% vs. 2.5%; p = 1.00) were comparable between the two groups. Exit-site infection was comparable (IRR: 0.66 95% CI 0.25-1.74) whilst peritonitis was significantly higher in urgent-start PD compared with conventional-start PD (incidence risk ratio (IRR) 3.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29-7.44). Time to first episode of peritonitis, particularly Gram-positive peritonitis was significantly shorter with urgent-start PD. Technique survival (hazards ratio (HR) 1.95, 95% CI 0.89-4.31) and patient survival (HR 1.46, 95% CI 0.44-4.87) were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION Urgent-start PD was associated with higher risks of dialysate leak and peritonitis but comparable technique and patient survival compared to conventional-start PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chee Chin Phang
- Department of Renal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Academia, Level 3, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
| | - Marjorie Wai Yin Foo
- Department of Renal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Academia, Level 3, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
| | - David W Johnson
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Disease Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.,Metro South and Ipswich Nephrology and Transplant Services (MINTS), Logan City, Australia
| | - Sin Yan Wu
- Department of Renal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Academia, Level 3, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
| | - Ying Hao
- Health Services Research Centre (HSRC), Singapore Health Services (SingHealth), Singapore, Singapore
| | - Mathini Jayaballa
- Department of Renal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Academia, Level 3, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
| | - Riece Koniman
- Department of Renal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Academia, Level 3, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
| | - Choong Meng Chan
- Department of Renal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Academia, Level 3, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
| | - Elizabeth Ley Oei
- Department of Renal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Academia, Level 3, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore
| | - Tze Tec Chong
- Department of General Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Htay Htay
- Department of Renal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Academia, Level 3, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|