Patrone L, Korosoglou G, Dharmarajah B, Theivacumar S, Antaredja M, Oberacker R, Tilemann L, Blessing E. Retrograde use of the Outback™ re-entry catheter in complex infrainguinal arterial recanalizations.
J Vasc Surg 2021;
75:177-185.e1. [PMID:
34302937 DOI:
10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.108]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE
Retrograde recanalizations gained increasing recognition in complex arterial occlusive disease. Re-entry devices are a well described adjunct for antegrade recanalizations. We present our experience with retrograde, infrainguinal recanalizations using the Outback™ re-entry catheter in challenging chronic total occlusions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We report data from a retrospective multicenter registry in complex retrograde recanalizations. Eligibility criteria included retrograde infrainguinal use of the Outback™ re-entry catheter where both conventional antegrade and retrograde recanalization had been unsuccessful. Procedural outcomes included technical success (defined as successful wire passage and delivery of adjunctive therapy with <30 % residual stenosis), safety (periprocedural complications, e.g. bleeding, vessel injury or occlusion of the artery at the re-entry site, and distal embolizations) and clinical outcome (amputation-free survival and freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization).
RESULTS
Forty-five consecutive patients underwent retrograde, infrainguinal recanalization attempts with the Outback™ re-entry catheter between February 2015 and August 2020. Thirty (67 %) patients had history of open vascular surgery in the index limb. In 4 patients, recanalizations were even more challenging due to previous surgical removal and/or ligation of the proximal segment of the superficial femoral artery. Retrograde access site of the Outback™ catheter was the femoropopliteal segment in 31 (69 %) patients and crural vessels in 14 (31 %) patients. The re-entry target sites were as follows: common femoral artery in 31 (69 %) patients, superficial femoral artery in 9 (20 %) patients, popliteal artery in 1 and below-the-knee arteries in 2 patients. In 4 patients, the needle of the re-entry device was targeted to an inflated balloon, inserted via the antegrade route. The Outback™ re-entry catheter was placed via a 6-French sheath in 19 (42 %) cases and sheathless in 26 (58 %) cases. Technical success was achieved in 41 (91 %) patients There were 2 instances of distal embolizations and 3 bleeding episodes. Amputation free survival was 100 % at 30 days and after 12 months, freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (cd TLR) was 95 % at 30 days and 75 % at 12 months follow-up. Female sex was an independent predictor for cd TLR at 12 months follow-up.
CONCLUSION
Retrograde use of the Outback™ re-entry catheter in infra-inguinal chronic total occlusions provides an effective and safe endovascular adjunct, when conventional antegrade and retrograde recanalization attempts have failed.
Collapse