Digital workflow for monolithic and veneered zirconia and metal-ceramic posterior fixed partial dentures: A five-year prospective randomized clinical trial

Purpose To evaluate and compare the survival, success rates, and biological and technical complications of three-unit posterior monolithic and veneered zirconia and metal-ceramic (MC) posterior fixed partial dentures (FPDs) fabricated using a digital workflow and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) over a 5-year follow-up.Methods Ninety patients in need of three-unit posterior FPDs were randomized to receive monolithic zirconia (MZ), veneered zirconia (VZ), and MC restorations (n = 30 each). Teeth preparations were scanned using an intraoral scanner, and restorations were milled and cemented with resin cement. Clinical performance and periodontal parameters were assessed at baseline and yearly up to 5 years after insertion. Data analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, Friedman test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction and Mann-Whitney U test.Results The 5-year survival rates of the MZ, VZ, and MC FPDs were 87%, 97%, and 100%, respectively (P = 0.04). Most complications were biological in nature. Only one MZ FPD fractured 58 months after placement. All the restorations were assessed as satisfactory at each recall. Differences were found in the gingival index score over time in the VZ and MC groups. The margin index remained stable throughout the follow-up period in both zirconia groups.Conclusions The results of this study suggest that using a digital workflow to fabricate posterior FPDs is an adequate treatment option and that monolithic zirconia could be a viable alternative to metal-ceramic or veneered zirconia. However, further long-term studies are necessary to provide stronger evidence in patients with bruxism.

Randomized clinical trial comparing monolithic and veneered zirconia three-unit posterior fixed partial dentures in a complete digital flow: three-year follow-up

Objectives

To evaluate and to compare the clinical performance and survival rate of posterior monolithic and veneered zirconia fixed partial dentures (FPDs).

Material and methods

Sixty 3-unit posterior FPDs were included in the study. The patients were randomly distributed into two groups (n = 30 each) to receive either a monolithic (Zenostar T, Wieland Dental) or veneered zirconia (IPS e.max ZirCAD, Ivoclar Vivadent) FPD. Each patient received only 1 FPD. Tooth preparations were scanned (Trios 3, 3Shape), designed (Dental System 2016, 3 Shape), milled (Zenotec CAM 3.2, Wieland Dental), and cemented with a resin cement. Technical and biological outcomes and periodontal parameters were assessed. Data analysis was made using the Friedman and the Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with the Bonferroni correction and the Mann–Whitney U test.

Results

The survival rate at 3 years was 100% for veneered and 90% for monolithic zirconia restorations. Three monolithic zirconia FPDs were lost because of biologic complications. The main complication in the veneered zirconia FPDs was the fracture of the veneering ceramic in 4 of the veneered zirconia FPDs. No fracture of the frameworks was observed in any of the groups. All restorations were assessed as satisfactory after 3 years. No differences in periodontal parameters were observed between the groups.

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that monolithic zirconia and complete digital flow could be a viable alternative to veneered zirconia in the posterior regions.

Clinical relevance

The monolithic zirconia restorations with a digital workflow can be a viable alternative in posterior fixed partial dentures, with good periodontal outcomes.

Clinical trial registration number

ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT 04,879,498).

Factors influencing the survival of implant-supported ceramic-ceramic prostheses: A randomized, controlled clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

The goals of this research are: (1) to determine the clinical survival of ceramic-ceramic 3-unit implant supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) compared with control metal-ceramic and; (2) to analyze the effects of design parameters such as connector height, radius of curvature of gingival embrasure, and occlusal veneer thickness.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This randomized, controlled clinical trial enrolled 96 participants with 129 3-unit implant-supported FDPs. Participants were randomized to receive different design combinations to include FDP material, thickness of occlusal veneer ceramic, radius of curvature of gingival embrasure and connector height. Participants were recalled for 6 months, 1year and yearly thereafter for the next 5 years. FDPs were examined for evidence of fracture and radiographs were made to assess viability of implants. Fractographic analyses and Kaplan Meier survival analysis was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

27 FDPs, representing 21%, exhibited chipping fractures of the veneer during the 5-year observation period. There was no statistically significant effect of type of material, veneer thickness, radius of curvature of gingival embrasure and connector height on occurrence of fracture. Fractographic and occlusal analyses reveal that fractures originated from the occlusal surface and that occlusion was the most important factor in determining survival. Stresses calculated at failure demonstrated lower values compared with in vitro data.

CONCLUSION

Implant-supported ceramic-ceramic prosthesis is a viable alternative to metal-ceramic. Survival analysis for both materials were comparable and design parameters employed in this study did not affect survival as long as zirconia was used as the core material.

Outcome of posterior fixed dental prostheses made from veneered zirconia over an observation period of up to 13 years

OBJECTIVES

It was the aim of this clinical study to evaluate the long-term outcome of 3- to 4-unit posterior all-ceramic fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) made from veneered zirconia ceramic.

METHODS

Between June 2003 and February 2005, 48 patients received 58 restorations. Twenty-four FDPs had a fixed-to-fixed design (FF) and thirty-four FDPs had a cantilever design (CA). Frameworks were scanned and milled out of 3 mol% yttrium-oxide partially-stabilized zirconia ceramic (CerconBase30, Degudent) and were veneered with feldspathic ceramic (CerconCeramS, Degudent). All FDPs were cemented with glass-ionomer cement (Ketac-Cem, 3 MEspe) after air-abrading the inner crown surfaces.

RESULTS

The mean observation period was 85.4 ± 54 (FF) and 91.7 ± 50 (CA) months, respectively. Ten cantilever FDPs and 5 fixed FDPs were lost due to biological problems of the abutment teeth. Two cantilever FDPs and 4 fixed-to-fixed FDPs were lost due to technical failures of the ceramic materials. The cumulative 13-year survival rate was 43.2% (FF) (CI: 22.8-66.2%) and 52.5% (CA) (CI: 32.5-71.8), respectively. In 13 cases, intraoral repair or polishing of the fractured feldspathic ceramic veneers was needed (7 in group FF, 6 in CA). Eight abutments of six restorations (4 in FF, 4 in CA) had to be treated endodontically and caries therapy was needed in 6 abutment teeth (4 in group FF, 2 in CA). The cumulative 13-year success rate was 29.5% (FF) (CI: 12.1-55.9%) and 22.5% (CA) (CI: 7.9-49.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of the present investigation, posterior fixed dental prostheses made from veneered zirconia with either a fixed-to fixed or a cantilever design show comparable survival and success rates after 13 years of clinical observation.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

FDPs made from veneered zirconia ceramic present high failure and complication rates, irrespective of the design (fixed-to-fixed or cantilevered).

Complete rehabilitation of patients with bruxism by veneered and non-veneered zirconia restorations with an increased vertical dimension of occlusion: an observational case-series study

PURPOSE

To assess the clinical performance of the complete rehabilitation of a series of patients with bruxism treated by teeth- and implant-supported veneered and non-veneered zirconia restorations with an increased vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO).

METHODS

Ten patients with bruxism, aged 62-70 years, were treated with 108 veneered and 142 non-veneered zirconia restorations and attended the recall appointment. The mean observation period was 28.2 (±16.8) months. The patients were identified from records, and clinical details were retrieved from their files. In the recall appointment, the restorations were evaluated using modified California Dental Association (CDA) criteria. The periodontal probing depth, bleeding index, presence of caries and implant survival and success rate were recorded.

RESULTS

No biological complications were recorded for any restorations. The success and survival rate of all implants was 100%. The overall mean survival and success rate of all restorations was 99.6%. In the veneered group, the predominant complication was minor veneer chipping (13.9%) on the incisal edge, which required only polishing (grade 1); in the non-veneered group, the predominant failure was open proximal contacts between the implant restoration and adjacent teeth (9%); only one implant restoration needed repair. One restoration was replaced due to a horizontal tooth fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of this study, we conclude that the survival and success rate of monolithic zirconia restorations installed in patients with bruxism was excellent, although the veneered zirconia restorations showed a high rate of minor veneer chipping, which required only polishing.